Literature DB >> 26711495

Dynamic Re-calibration of Perceived Size in Fovea and Periphery through Predictable Size Changes.

Matteo Valsecchi1, Karl R Gegenfurtner2.   

Abstract

The same object produces quite distinct images in the cortical representation, depending on whether it is looked at foveally or with the periphery, yet some form of size constancy prevents us from experiencing objects inflating or deflating as we move our eyes. According to the prominent sensorimotor account of vision by O'Regan and Noë [1], we constantly learn to discount the predictable sensory effects of motor actions, such as the projection of a stimulus on a larger cortical area as it gets foveated. Although previous studies have shown that foveal and parafoveal inputs can be associated in visual memory [2, 3], trans-saccadic prediction error could in principle re-calibrate even the appearance of peripheral and foveal stimuli. Here we introduce a new paradigm that induces such changes in the relative appearance of peripheral and foveal stimuli when directly compared. Repeated exposure to a trans-saccadic change in size, though unnoticed by most observers, induced a substantial modification of perceived size that lasted at least 1 day. Prediction is not limited to the motor system but can also occur for the sensory effects of external events, such as stimulus motion. We show that perceptual re-calibration can occur in the absence of eye movements if the change in size occurs predictably while objects move across the visual field. Perceptual uniformity emerges due to the continuously updated prediction of foveal appearance based on peripheral appearance.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26711495     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  16 in total

1.  Perceptual learning while preparing saccades.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Nicholas Murray-Smith; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Eye movements shape visual learning.

Authors:  Pooya Laamerad; Daniel Guitton; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Object discrepancy modulates feature prediction across eye movements.

Authors:  Cassandra Philine Köller; Christian H Poth; Arvid Herwig
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-31

Review 4.  Visual Space Constructed by Saccade Motor Maps.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Numerosity estimation benefits from transsaccadic information integration.

Authors:  Carolin Hübner; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Attention modulates trans-saccadic integration.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Auditory compensation for head rotation is incomplete.

Authors:  Tom C A Freeman; John F Culling; Michael A Akeroyd; W Owen Brimijoin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A comparison of the temporal and spatial properties of trans-saccadic perceptual recalibration and saccadic adaptation.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Carlos Cassanello; Arvid Herwig; Martin Rolfs; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Humans Trust Central Vision More Than Peripheral Vision Even in the Dark.

Authors:  Alejandro H Gloriani; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The Perceived Size and Shape of Objects in Peripheral Vision.

Authors:  Joseph Baldwin; Alistair Burleigh; Robert Pepperell; Nicole Ruta
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.