Literature DB >> 26709499

Outcomes of Sequential Glaucoma Drainage Implants in Refractory Glaucoma.

Wanda D Hu1, Marlene R Moster, Cindy X Zheng, Naryan Sabherwal, Edward Pequignot, Victor Cvintal, Feyzahan Ekici, Michael Waisbourd.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the outcomes of eyes that have undergone a second glaucoma drainage implant (GDI) surgery.
METHODS: A retrospective review of eyes that underwent a second GDI surgery from 2006 to 2013 was conducted. Primary outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and success rates. Secondary outcome measures included glaucoma medication use, visual acuity, and number of reoperations. Success was defined as 6 ≤ IOP ≤ 21 with at least 20% IOP reduction, and no increase in the number of glaucoma medications from baseline at 3 months of follow-up or more.
RESULTS: Sixty-five eyes (63 patients) had a mean follow-up of 22.4 ± 19.9 months. The most frequently placed second GDIs were an Ahmed FP7 (49%) or a Baerveldt 250 (26%) in the inferotemporal (46%) or inferonasal (35%) quadrant. At 3-year follow-up, IOP was reduced from 25.8 ± 7.7 to 17.4 ± 9.9 mm Hg (P = 0.004) and the number of glaucoma medications decreased from 3.6 ± 1.2 to 2.5 ± 1.4 (P = 0.01) compared with baseline. The median time to failure was 24.7 ± 5.8 months. There was no significant difference in failure rates for type of sequential GDI (P = 0.80) or plate location (P = 0.34). There was no significant difference in visual acuity between baseline and 3-year follow-up (P = 1.0). The most common postoperative complication was corneal edema (n = 9, 14%).
CONCLUSIONS: Most eyes undergoing a second GDI achieve adequate IOP control with fewer antiglaucoma medications. Failure rates were similar regardless of quadrant selection or GDI type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26709499     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  7 in total

1.  Baerveldt surgery outcomes: anterior chamber insertion versus vitreous cavity insertion.

Authors:  Naoki Tojo; Atsushi Hayashi; Tomoko Consolvo-Ueda; Shuichiro Yanagisawa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in complex eyes.

Authors:  Aazim Siddiqui; Winston D Chamberlain
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.299

Review 3.  [Revision surgery in episcleral glaucoma drainage devices].

Authors:  A Rosentreter; T S Dietlein
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Neuro-protective Mechanisms of Lycium barbarum.

Authors:  Xiwen Xing; Fenyong Liu; Jia Xiao; Kwok Fai So
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  Safety and Efficacy of Second Ahmed Valve Implant in Refractory Glaucoma.

Authors:  Chiara Posarelli; Mario Damiano Toro; Robert Rejdak; Tomasz Żarnowski; Dorota Pożarowska; Antonio Longo; Mario Miccoli; Marco Nardi; Michele Figus
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Transconjunctival XEN45 Implantation for Glaucoma Performed at the Slit Lamp: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sébastien Gagné; Darana Yuen; Shawn Cohen
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.290

7.  Surgical Outcomes of a Second Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation in Asian Eyes with Refractory Glaucoma.

Authors:  Sze Chuan Ong; Maria Cecilia Aquino; Paul Chew; Victor Koh
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 1.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.