Literature DB >> 26709194

Ki67--An unsuitable marker of gastric cancer prognosis unmasks intratumoral heterogeneity.

Christine Böger1, Hans-Michael Behrens1, Christoph Röcken1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Due to contradictious findings of previous studies regarding Ki67's value in gastric cancer (GC), we reevaluated the expression of Ki67 in whole tissue sections (WTS) and tissue microarrays (TMAs) of GC testing the following hypotheses: does Ki67 show intratumoral heterogeneity; are TMAs representative in the determination of the Ki67 proliferation index (PI); is the Ki67 PI subject to an intralaboratory variability; and is the Ki67 PI related to clinico-pathological patient characteristics and/or prognostically relevant in GC.
METHODS: Corresponding WTS and TMAs samples from 315 GCs were stained immunohistochemically. The Ki67 PI evaluated on WTS was correlated with the Ki67 PI evaluated on TMAs, sample age, clinico-pathological characteristics, and patient survival.
RESULTS: The overall amount of Ki67-positive tumor cells did not depend on sample age. Three distinct, partly heterogeneous Ki67 expression patterns were observed. The mean Ki67 PI evaluated on TMAs differed on average minus 16.9% from the Ki67 PI evaluated on WTS. Ki67 in WTS correlated significantly with the Laurén phenotype and tumor grade, but not with patient survival.
CONCLUSION: TMAs carry the risk of a systematic underestimation of the Ki67 PI. Ki67 has no prognostic value in GC but might be a potential indicator of intratumoral heterogeneity.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Surgical Oncology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prognostic biomarker; proliferation; tumor heterogeneity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26709194      PMCID: PMC4736456          DOI: 10.1002/jso.24104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


INTRODUCTION

Prognostic biomarkers are the most important instrument for tailoring oncologic treatment and predicting cancer patientś prognosis. In gastric cancer (GC), the tumor‐ (T), node‐ (N), metastasis‐ (M) classification of the union internationale contre le cancer (UICC) is the single currently used prognostic biomarker on a routine basis, but recent studies have shown that the 7th edition of the UICC‐stage grouping is not able to sufficiently discriminate patient's survival 1, 2, 3. Additional reliable prognostic biomarkers, for example, immunohistochemistry or RNA/DNA‐based tests, are urgently needed but not established yet on a routine basis 4. The quest for a significant prognostic biomarker in GC has led to the examination of Ki67 over 20 years ago 5, 6, 7. Ki67 is a nuclear located protein that is closely linked to cell proliferation. It is present in all active phases of the cell cycle, but absent from resting cells, thus, indicating the proliferating cell fraction 8. Ki67 is an established prognostic biomarker in several tumor entities, for example, breast cancer, lymphoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasia 9, 10, 11. Despite several previous investigations, the prognostic value of Ki67 proliferation index (PI) in GC remains contradictious. Different analytical methods to assess the Ki67 PI were used, and former investigations mainly relied on tissue microarrays (TMAs) without ever evaluating whether TMAs are suitable in general for the determination of the Ki67 PI in GC. In order to fill this gap of information, we systemically investigated the prognostic value of the Ki67 PI in a large and thoroughly characterized cohort of GC, testing the following hypothesis: (i) Does Ki67 show any distinct intratumoral expression pattern in whole tissue sections (WTS); (ii) is the detection of Ki67 PI influenced by sample age, (iii) are TMAs applicable in the determination of the Ki67 PI in GC; and (iv) is the Ki67 PI related to clinico‐pathological patient characteristics and/or prognostically relevant in GC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Population

From the archive of the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Kiel, we sought caucasian patients who had undergone either total or partial gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or oesophago‐gastric junction between 1997 and 2009. The following patient characteristics were retrieved: type of surgery, age at diagnosis, gender, tumor size, tumor localization, tumor type, tumor grade, depth of invasion, residual tumor status, number of lymph nodes resected, and number of lymph nodes with metastases. Patients were included if: (i) an adenocarcinoma of the stomach or oesophago‐gastric junction was histologically confirmed; (ii) the overall tumor mass was large enough to get five TMA punches; and (iii) the Ki67 PI could be assigned on both WTS and corresponding TMAs obtained from the same paraffin blocks. Exclusion criteria were defined as: (i) histology identified a tumor type other than adenocarcinoma; and (ii) patients had undergone a perioperative chemo‐ or radiotherapy. Each resected specimen had undergone gross sectioning and histological examination by trained and board certified surgical pathologists. Date of patient death was obtained from the Epidemiological Cancer Registry of the state of Schleswig‐Holstein, Germany. Follow‐up data of those patients who were still alive were retrieved from hospital records and general practitioners. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethical review board (D 453/10). All patient data were pseudonymized prior to study inclusion.

Histology

Tissue specimens were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin (FFPE). Deparaffinized sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Histological re‐examination of primary tissue sections was carried out for all cases to assure if inclusion criteria were confirmed. Tumors were classified according to the Laurén classification 12 and re‐examined by two surgical pathologists. pTNM‐stage of all study patients was determined according to the 7th edition of the UICC guidelines 13.

Tissue Microarray Construction

FFPE tissue samples were used to generate TMAs as described previously 14. Briefly, five morphologically representative regions of the paraffindonor” blocks (tumor) were chosen, and tissue cylinders of 1.5 mm diameter were punched from these areas. Afterwards, the tissue cylinders were inserted into a new “recipient” paraffin block using a custom‐built instrument (Beecher Instruments, Silver Spring, MD). The new recipient paraffin blocks were warmed in a 60°C heating cabinet for 7 min to create a sufficient bond between the tumor tissue and the recipient block paraffin. 2.5 μm thick serial sections were obtained from the new recipient paraffin blocks, dried in a 60°C heating cabinet for 6 hr and stored in polystyrene slide storage boxes at 8°C until use.

Immunohistochemistry, Assessment of Microsatellite Instability and Detection of Helicobacter pylori‐ and Epstein‐Barr‐Virus‐Infection

Immunohistochemical stainings were carried out with a Bondmax (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) automated slide staining system, using the Polymer Refine Detection Kit (Menarini Diagnostics, Berlin, Germany) and a monoclonal rabbit antibody, directed against Ki67 (clone SP6, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Pretreatment was done with ER2 for 20 min. The antibody was diluted in antibody diluent (Zytomed Systems, Berlin, Germany) and applied in a 1:300 dilution. Immunohistochemical stainings of Her2/neu, the assessment of microsatellite instability using immunohistochemistry and molecular biology, and the evaluation of Helicobacter pylori‐ and Epstein‐Barr‐virus‐infection was carried out as previously described 4, 15.

Evaluation of Immunostaining

The nuclear expression of Ki67 was manually counted within 500 tumor cells for each tumor in the area of the highest density of Ki67‐positive nuclei (“hot spot”). All nuclear staining was considered as “positive,” irrespective of its intensity. The Her2/neu status was assessed as previously described 15.

Study Design

In a first step, the Ki67 PI of each tumor was evaluated immunohistochemically on WTS and TMAs of corresponding tumors, and the level of agreement was assigned. The intralaboratory variability was studied by correlating the staining results of the WTS and TMAs with sample age. Additionally, the staining results of the WTS were correlated with clinico‐pathological characteristics, including gender, age, Laurén phenotype, mucin phenotype, localization, T‐ and N‐category, lymphatic invasion (L‐category), venous invasion (V‐category), UICC‐stage (7th edition), lymph node ratio (LNR), tumor grade, residual tumor status, Helicobacter pylori‐, Epstein‐Barr‐virus (EBV)‐, microsatellite instability (MSI)‐, and Her2/neu‐status, as well as survival data.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were done using SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corporation, New York). Ki67 raw values were correlated with clinico‐pathological patient characteristics and survival data. For comparison purposes, the Ki67 PI evaluated by WTS was dichotomized at the median; patients below median were classified as “Ki67 low,” patients with a Ki67 PI ≥ median were classified as “Ki67 high.” The Ki67 PI was split into quartiles additionally. Moreover, a subgroup analysis of intestinal‐ and diffuse‐type GCs according to the Laurén classification was done. The correlation between the Ki67 PI of WTS and TMAs was calculated by using Spearman's rho and Cohen's kappa. A kappa value of 0.20 was considered to be poor, of 0.21–0.40 to be fair, of 0.41–0.60 to be moderate, of 0.61–0.80 to be good, and of 0.81–1.00 to be very good. Median overall survival and tumor specific survival was determined using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log‐rank test was used to determine significance. We further applied a Cox regression to calculate the influence of raw Ki67 PI on survival. The significance of correlation between clinico‐pathological parameters and the Ki67 PI groups evaluated by WTS was tested using Fisher's exact test. For parameters of ordinal scale (T‐category, N‐category, UICC stage) we applied Kendall's tau test instead. For the comparison between raw Ki67 PI values and clinico‐pathological characteristics we calculated median values and 25%‐ and 75%‐percentiles, respectively. Significance of differences between median values was assessed using the Kruskal‐Wallis test. P values were derived from two‐tailed tests. A P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. No adjustments were made. To account for the effects of multiple testing, we applied the explorative Simes (Benjamini‐Hochberg) procedure 16.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifteen patients fulfilled all study criteria. The clinico‐pathological patient characteristics are summarized in Table I. According to Laurén, an intestinal phenotype was found in 170 (54.0%), a diffuse type in 82 (26.0%), a mixed type in 23 (7.3%), and an unclassifiable type in 40 (12.7%) patients. Overall survival data was available in 304 of 315 cases (96.5%), tumor specific survival data in 281 of 315 cases (89.2%). Mean follow‐up period was 17.6 months (range 0.07–142.7 months).
Table I

Clinico‐Pathological Patient Characteristics and Correlation With the Ki67 Proliferation Index

Raw Ki67 PIDichotomized Ki67 PIKi67 PI split into Quartiles
Characteristicvalid [n]Total [n (%)]Median25th–75th Per­centile P‐ValueKi67 low [n (%)]Ki67 high [n (%)] P‐valueKi67 first quartile [n (%)]Ki67 second quartile [n (%)]Ki67 third quartile [n (%)]Ki67 fourth quartile [n (%)] P‐value
Gender315Female113 (35.9)67(41–82)0.141 a 60 (53.1)53 (46.9)0.412 c 35 (31.0)25 (22.1)30 (26.5)23 (20.4)0.092 d
Male202 (64.1)69(51–84)97 (48.0)105 (52.0)43 (21.3)54 (26.7)49 (24.3)56 (27.7)
Age315≤68 years142 (46.6)68(45–83)0.544 a 72 (50.7)70 (49.3)1.000 c 40 (28.2)32 (22.5)37 (26.1)33 (23.2)0.454 d
>68 years163 (53.4)69(51–84)82 (50.3)81 (49.7)37 (22.7)45 (27.6)37 (22.7)44 (27.0)
Laurén phenotype315Intestinal170 (54.0)72(55–85) <0.001 a 70 (41.2)100 (58.8) <0.001 c 28 (16.5)42 (24.7)50 (29.4)50 (29.4) 0.004 c
Diffuse82 (26.0)52(35–75)57 (69.5)25 (30.5)35 (42.7)22 (26.8)13 (15.9)12 (14.6)
Mixed23 (7.3)72(52–85)10 (43.5)13 (56.5)5 (21.7)5 (21.7)6 (26.1)7 (30.4)
Unclassified40 (12.7)69(43–84)20 (50.0)20 (50.0)10 (25.0)10 (25.0)10 (25.0)10 (25.0)
Mucin phenotype279Intestinal82 (29.4)74(52–84)0.241 a 33 (40.2)49 (59.8)0.221 c 19 (23.2)14 (17.1)26 (31.7)23 (28.0)0.114 c
Gastric35 (12.5)63(40–80)18 (51.4)17 (48.6)12 (34.3)6 (17.1)11 (31.4)6 (17.1)
Mixed117 (41.9)68(53–84)61 (52.1)56 (47.9)25 (21.4)36 (30.8)24 (20.5)32 (27.4)
Unclassified45 (16.1)59(46–78)26 (57.8)19 (42.2)12 (26.7)14 (31.1)13 (28.9)6 (13.3)
Localization315Proximal108 (34.3)76(58–86)0.003 a 43 (39.8)65 (60.2)0.013 d 21 (19.4)22 (20.4)30 (27.8)35 (32.4)0.009 d
Distal207 (65.7)65(45–80)114 (55.1)93 (44.9)57 (27.5)57 (27.5)49 (23.7)44 (21.3)
T‐category315T1a/b25 (7.9)78(57–88)0.506 a 9 (36.0)16 (64.0)0.251 d 5 (20.0)4 (16.0)6 (24.0)10 (40.0)0.316 d
T244 (14.0)72(54–83)19 (43.2)25 (56.8)9 (20.5)10 (22.7)17 (38.6)8 (18.2)
T3127 (40.3)66(47–83)68 (53.5)59 (46.5)32 (25.2)36 (28.3)28 (22.0)31 (24.4)
T4a/b119 (37.8)68(45–84)61 (51.3)58 (48.7)32 (26.9)29 (24.4)28 (23.5)30 (25.2)
N‐category314N078 (24.8)72(54–86)0.128 a 30 (38.5)48 (61.5)0.017 d 19 (24.4)11 (14.1)24 (30.8)24 (30.8)0.048 d
N147 (15.0)73(47–85)21 (44.7)26 (55.3)12 (25.5)9 (19.1)10 (21.3)16 (34.0)
N257 (18.2)64(48–84)32 (56.1)25 (43.9)14 (24.6)18 (31.6)10 (17.5)15 (26.3)
N3/a/b132 (42.0)65(48–80)73 (55.3)59 (44.7)33 (25.0)40 (30.3)35 (26.5)24 (18.2)
L‐category303L0141 (46.5)68(47–83)0.744 a 73 (51.8)68 (48.2)0.491 c 37 (26.2)36 (25.5)36 (25.5)32 (22.7)0.367 d
L1162 (53.5)69(49–84)77 (47.5)85 (52.5)38 (23.5)39 (24.1)41 (25.3)44 (27.2)
V‐category301V0263 (87.4)69(47–83)0.778 a 131 (49.8)132 (50.2)1.000 c 67 (25.5)64 (24.3)67 (25.5)65 (24.7)0.805 d
V138 (12.6)70(54–84)19 (50.0)19 (50.0)8 (21.1)11 (28.9)9 (23.7)10 (26.3)
UICC Stage (7th ed.)310IA18 (5.8)75(40–87)0.024 a 7 (38.9)11 (61.1)0.009 d 5 (27.8)2 (11.1)5 (27.8)6 (33.3)0.012 d
IB21 (6.8)74(54–89)8 (38.1)13 (61.9)4 (19.0)4 (19.0)7 (33.3)6 (28.6)
IIA42 (13.5)73(51–86)16 (38.1)26 (61.9)10 (23.8)6 (14.3)12 (28.6)14 (33.3)
IIB31 (10.0)70(47–84)16 (51.6)15 (48.4)10 (32.3)6 (19.4)8 (25.8)7 (22.6)
IIIA44 (14.2)66(51–84)23 (52.3)21 (47.7)8 (18.2)15 (34.1)10 (22.7)11 (25.0)
IIIB52 (16.8)69(55–86)25 (48.1)27 (51.9)11 (21.2)14 (26.9)10 (19.2)17 (32.7)
IIIC43 (13.9)69(53–81)21 (48.8)22 (51.2)8 (18.6)13 (30.2)13 (30.2)9 (20.9)
IV59 (19.0)56(40–73)38 (64.4)21 (35.6)22 (37.3)16 (27.1)14 (23.7)7 (11.9)
LNR306≤0.229153 (50.0)73(54–86)0.005 a 64 (41.8)89 (58.2)0.016 c 33 (21.6)31 (20.3)39 (25.5)50 (32.7)0.008 d
>0.229153 (50.0)65(45–78)86 (56.2)67 (43.8)40 (26.1)46 (30.1)39 (25.5)28 (18.3)
Tumor grade307G1/G270 (22.8)74(53–90) 0.005 a 26 (37.1)44 (62.9)0.015 c 14 (20.0)12 (17.1)20 (28.6)24 (34.3)0.020 d
G3/G4237 (77.2)65(46–81)128 (54.0)109 (46.0)62 (26.2)66 (27.8)58 (24.5)51 (21.5)
Residual tumor302R0263 (87.1)69(50–83)0.528 a 128 (48.7)135 (51.3)0.864 c 62 (23.6)66 (25.1)70 (26.6)65 (24.7)0.994 d
R1/R239 (12.9)63(38–86)20 (51.3)19 (48.7)11 (28.2)9 (23.1)7 (17.9)12 (30.8)
Helicobacter pylori status266Negative221 (83.1)68(49–83)0.724 a 113 (51.1)108 (48.9)0.626 c 55 (24.9)58 (26.2)55 (24.9)53 (24.0)0.524 d
Positive45 (16.9)71(52–86)21 (46.7)24 (53.3)10 (22.2)11 (24.4)11 (24.4)13 (28.9)
EBV status308Negative296 (96.1)68(49–84)0.569 a 150 (50.7)146 (49.3)0.138 c 73 (24.7)77 (26.0)71 (24.0)75 (25.3)0.444 d
Positive12 (3.9)74(56–80)3 (25.0)9 (75.0)1 (8.3)2 (16.7)8 (66.7)1 (8.3)
MSI303MSS278 (91.7)68(50–83)0.346 a 140 (50.4)138 (49.6)0.211 c 66 (23.7)74 (26.6)69 (24.8)69 (24.8)0.360 d
MSI‐H25 (8.3)72(63–84)9 (36.0)16 (64.0)5 (20.0)4 (16.0)9 (36.0)7 (28.0)
Her2/neu status315Negative289 (91.7)67(47–83)0.011 a 149 (51.6)140 (48.4)0.064 c 74 (25.6)75 (26.0)70 (24.2)70 (24.2)0.076 d
Positive26 (8.3)81(66–91)8 (30.8)18 (69.2)4 (15.4)4 (15.4)9 (34.6)9 (34.6)
Overall survival [months]304Events (Dead)243 (79.9)0.274 b 125 (81.2)118 (78.7)0.564 e 63 (81.8)62 (80.5)60 (81.1)58 (76.3)0.758 e
Alive61 (20.1)29 (18.8)32 (21.3)14 (18.2)15 (19.5)14 (18.9)18 (23.7)
Median survival [Months]14.0 ± 1.614.1 ± 1.715.0 ± 2.013.2 ± 2.013.8 ± 1.814.7 ± 2.5
95%CI10.9–17.110.7–17.411.1–18.89.3–17.110.4–17.39.7–19.6
Tumor specific survival [months]281Events (Dead)197 (70.1)0.196 b 102 (72.3)95 (67.9)0.370 e 49 (71.0)53 (73.6)47 (69.1)48 (66.7)0.731 e
Alive/ DOOD84 (29.9)39 (27.7)45 (32.1)20 (29.0)19 (26.4)21 (30.9)24 (33.3)
Median survival [Months]16.0 ± 1.815.6 ± 2.316.7 ± 1.813.6 ± 2.715.4 ± 2.815.6 ± 2.1
95%CI12.5–19.511.2–20.113.1–20.28.2–18.99.9–20.88.5–24.7

P‐values printed in bold denote significant correlation after Simes' multiple testing procedure.

UICC, union internationale contre le cancer; LNR, lymph node ratio; EBV, Epstein‐Barr‐virus; MSI, microsatellite instability; DOOD, died of other disease.

Kruskal‐Wallis test.

Cox regression. HR(Overall survival)=0.997 [0.991‐1.002]; HR(Tumor specific survival)=0.996 [0.990–1.002].

Fisher's exact test.

Kendall's tau test.

log‐rank test.

Clinico‐Pathological Patient Characteristics and Correlation With the Ki67 Proliferation Index P‐values printed in bold denote significant correlation after Simes' multiple testing procedure. UICC, union internationale contre le cancer; LNR, lymph node ratio; EBV, Epstein‐Barr‐virus; MSI, microsatellite instability; DOOD, died of other disease. Kruskal‐Wallis test. Cox regression. HR(Overall survival)=0.997 [0.991‐1.002]; HR(Tumor specific survival)=0.996 [0.990–1.002]. Fisher's exact test. Kendall's tau test. log‐rank test.

Ki67 Expression Patterns in WTS

In WTS, three different Ki67 expression patterns could be observed: 132 cases (41.9%) showed a homogeneous or “diffuse” distribution of Ki67‐positive tumor cells; 66 cases (20.9%) showed a heterogeneous Ki67‐expression pattern with more abundant Ki67‐positive tumor cells at the tumor surface and/or at the invasion front; and 117 cases (37.1%) showed a heterogeneous, “clonal” distribution of Ki67‐positive tumor cells (Fig. 1). According to Laurén, a “homogeneous/diffuse” expression pattern was observed significantly more often in the unclassified phenotype, a “heterogeneous/superficial ± invasion front” distribution significantly more often in the diffuse and mixed phenotype, and a “heterogeneous/clonal” expression pattern significantly more often in the intestinal and mixed phenotype (P < 0.001; Table II).
Figure 1

Ki67 shows a heterogeneous expression pattern in the majority of gastric cancers. (a–c) shows a case with an increased Ki67 expression at the tumor surface (b), whereas deep‐lying areas show a low Ki67 PI (c). (d) illustrates a gastric carcinoma with a heterogeneous, “clonal” Ki67 expression pattern, characterized by tumor areas with a very high Ki67 PI (right) that are located in close proximity to tumor portions with a very low Ki67 PI (left). (e) and (f) are taken from the WTS (e) respectively the TMA (f) of the same tumor that shows a homogeneous, “diffuse” distribution of Ki67 positive tumor cells and, accordingly, a good level of agreement between the Ki67 PI evaluated on WTS and TMAs. Ki67 immunostaining, original magnification 50‐fold (a), 250‐fold (b–f).

Table II

Correlation Between the Laurén Phenotype and Ki67 Expression Patterns

Ki67 expression pattern
Characteristicvalid [n]Total [n (%)]Homogeneous/“diffuse” [n (%)]Heterogeneous/superficial ± invasion front [n (%)]Heterogeneous/“clonal” [n (%)] P‐value
Laurén phenotype315Intestinal170 (54.0)62 (36.5)30 (17.6)78 (45.9)<0.001 a
Diffuse82 (26.0)40 (48.8)21 (25.6)21 (25.6)
Mixed23 (7.3)3 (13.0)8 (34.8)12 (52.2)
Unclassified40 (12.7)27 (67.5)7 (17.5)6 (15.0)

Fisher's exact test.

Ki67 shows a heterogeneous expression pattern in the majority of gastric cancers. (a–c) shows a case with an increased Ki67 expression at the tumor surface (b), whereas deep‐lying areas show a low Ki67 PI (c). (d) illustrates a gastric carcinoma with a heterogeneous, “clonal” Ki67 expression pattern, characterized by tumor areas with a very high Ki67 PI (right) that are located in close proximity to tumor portions with a very low Ki67 PI (left). (e) and (f) are taken from the WTS (e) respectively the TMA (f) of the same tumor that shows a homogeneous, “diffuse” distribution of Ki67 positive tumor cells and, accordingly, a good level of agreement between the Ki67 PI evaluated on WTS and TMAs. Ki67 immunostaining, original magnification 50‐fold (a), 250‐fold (b–f). Correlation Between the Laurén Phenotype and Ki67 Expression Patterns Fisher's exact test.

Ki67 Pi in WTS and TMAs

The Ki67 PI assessed by WTS ranged from 2% to 99% (mean 64.3%, median 69.0%, standard deviation 22.4%). Divided by the median, 157 cases (49.8%) were classified as “Ki67 low,” and 158 cases (50.2%) were classified as “Ki67 high.” The first quartile contained 78 cases (24.7%), the second, third, and fourth quartile contained each 79 cases (each 25.1%). The Ki67 PI assessed by TMAs ranged from 1% to 99% (mean 47.4%, median 44.5%, standard deviation 26.6%). Divided by the Ki67 PI median evaluated on WTS, 231 cases (73.3%) were classified as “Ki67 low,” and 84 cases (26.7%) were classified as “Ki67 high.” Spearman's rho implied a positive agreement between the WTS‐ and TMAKi67 PI (r­s= 0.615; Fig. 2). Split by the median, both groups showed a moderate measure of agreement [κ = 0.455; asymptomatic standard error (ASE) 0.044].
Figure 2

Agreement between the Ki67 proliferation index evaluated on WTS and on TMAs. Correlation between the Ki67 proliferation index (Ki67 PI) evaluated on WTS and on TMAs for the entire cohort (a, b). Both groups showed a moderate measure of agreement (κ = 0.455; b). The Ki67 PI in our cohort did not correlate with the sample age of WTS (blue) or TMAs (green) (c). There was no significant correlation between the Ki67 PI and overall patient survival (P = 0.564; d).

Agreement between the Ki67 proliferation index evaluated on WTS and on TMAs. Correlation between the Ki67 proliferation index (Ki67 PI) evaluated on WTS and on TMAs for the entire cohort (a, b). Both groups showed a moderate measure of agreement (κ = 0.455; b). The Ki67 PI in our cohort did not correlate with the sample age of WTS (blue) or TMAs (green) (c). There was no significant correlation between the Ki67 PI and overall patient survival (P = 0.564; d). Regarding the Laurén phenotype, the level of agreement was moderate for intestinal (κ = 0.457; ASE 0.057), diffuse (κ = 0.412; ASE 0.106) and unclassified GCs (κ = 0.450; ASE 0.137), and fair for mixed type GCs (κ = 0.279; ASE 0.130). Evaluating the correlation between the Ki67 expression pattern and the level of agreement of the Ki67 PI in WTS and TMAs, carcinomas with a “homogeneous/diffuse” Ki67 expression pattern showed a good level of agreement (κ = 0.673; ASE 0.064), whereas tumors with a heterogeneous Ki67 expression pattern showed a fair level of agreement (Ki67‐positive cells superficial and/or at invasion front: κ = 0.367, ASE 0.104; “clonal” expression: κ = 0.296, ASE 0.061; Supplemental File S1). In view of the moderate agreement between TMA and WTS, we carried out all subsequent analyses using WTS only.

Evaluation of Intralaboratory Variability

Next we assessed the putative influence of sample age on the amount of Ki67‐positive tumor cells in WTS and TMAs. Using Spearman's rho, no significant agreement between the sample age and the Ki67 PI in WTS (rs= 0.058, P = 0.302) or TMAs (rs= 0.202, P = 0.127) was found (Fig. 2).

Clinico‐Pathological Correlation

Ki67 raw values evaluated on WTS were correlated with clinico‐pathological patient characteristics. Moreover, the Ki67 PI was split by the median, and all cases were divided accordingly into “Ki67 low” (Ki67 high” (≥median); additionally, the Ki67 PI was divided into quartiles. Ki67 correlated significantly with various clinico‐pathological patient characteristics (complete data is shown in Table I and in Supplemental File S2). After Simes' multiple testing procedure, the Laurén‐phenotype and the tumor grade remained the only clinico‐pathological parameter which correlated significantly with the Ki67 PI: The Ki67 PI was significantly higher in intestinal‐ and mixed‐type GCs compared to unclassified and diffuse‐type GCs (P < 0.001 for raw and dichotomized Ki67 values). Moreover, the median Ki67 PI (raw value) was significantly higher in G1/G2 differentiated GCs, compared to G3/G4 GCs (74% vs. 65%, P = 0.005). There was no other significant correlation between the Ki67 PI and any other clinico‐pathological patient characteristic after Simes' multiple testing procedure.

Prognostic Significance

Patient prognosis significantly depended on the Laurén phenotype, tumor grade, T‐, N‐, L‐, and V‐category, LNR, as well as UICC‐stage, residual tumor status, and MSI status (Supplemental File S3). There was no significant correlation between the Ki67 status and overall (P = 0.564) or tumor specific patient survival (P = 0.370; Fig. 2).

Subgroup Analysis

The subgroup analysis of intestinal‐ and diffuse‐type GCs revealed that patients with an intestinal‐type GC and 0–2 lymph node metastases (N0‐/N1‐category) respectively a LNR <0.229 had a significant higher median Ki67 PI than patients with ≥3 lymph node metastases (N2‐/N3‐category; P = 0.029) respectively a LNR ≥0.229 (P = 0.009). Additionally, a higher median Ki67 was observed significantly more often in UICC‐stage I and II intestinal‐type GCs compared to UICC‐stage III and IV intestinal‐type GCs (P = 0.007). Moreover, patients with a diffuse‐type GC and a Her2/neu‐overexpression/amplification had a significant higher median Ki67 PI compared to Her2/neu‐negative diffuse‐type GCs (82.0% vs. 52.6%; P = 0.036). However, in the subgroup analysis of intestinal‐ and diffuse‐type GCs, the Ki67 PI did not correlate significantly with any of the tested clinico‐pathological parameters nor with patient survival after Simes' multiple testing procedure (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

Gastric cancer is a prevalent, aggressive, and heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis 17; its distinct genetic complexity has been recently shown in an integrative genomic analysis including whole‐genome sequencing. A molecular classification of GC was proposed, which categorizes four subtypes: Epstein‐Barr‐virus (EBV)‐positive, microsatellite instable (MSI), chromosomal instable, and genomically stable GCs 18, 19. Additionally, evidence has accumulated indicating that patient prognosis and treatment‐response depends not only on the UICC tumor stage, but also on the expression and tumor specific alterations of intracellular signaling pathways 20. However, with regard to patient management, risk stratification is a major issue and various assays have been exploited in many different types of cancer, including gene expression profiling and counting mitoses. With regard to GC, except for TNM‐classification and the assessment of LNR, no other tissue based marker has stood the test of time or reached clinical practice. One of the oldest, most widely and sometimes most uncritically used, tissue based marker of prognosis is Ki67. Firstly, reported in 1983 and named after its city of origin (Kiel, Germany) and the number of the original clone in the 96‐well plate, the Ki67 antibody recognizes a nuclear antigen present in proliferating cells, which is absent in resting cells 21. Since then and despite great efforts, Ki67 could be established only in a minority of cancer entities because it often led to inconsistent and disappointing results. This also applies to GC. Ki67 has been tested as a prognostic biomarker in GC several times during the last decades, but the results remained contradictory: Several authors described a correlation between a high Ki67 PI and a poor prognosis, whereas Lee et al. 22 associated a low Ki67 PI with a poor patient's outcome; still other authors declared that Ki67 is of no prognostic value at all. These discrepancies might be related to methodological issues: The number of patients studied in 13 former studies ranged from 43 to 418. Apart from one single study, all other larger series relied on the analysis of TMAs, without ever testing whether this is a reliable approach to assess the Ki67 PI in GC at all. The number of cells counted in a single tumor ranged by a factor of ten from 100 to 1,000 or was sometimes not even indicated. Moreover, the cut‐off value to determine “Ki67 high” seemed to be chosen arbitrarily in most studies (Table III) 5, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33.
Table III

Literature Review

ReferencePublication datenSample materialCells countedMean %Median %Cut‐offCorrelation with clinco‐pathological parametersCorrelation with survival
Müller et al.1996418WTS100051.353.3MedianNoneNone
Ramires et al.199743WTS100032.7n.s.n.s.Nonen.e.
Manzoni et al.199856WTS1000n.s.n.s.<10%, 10–40%, >40%Higher Ki67 PI in patients >68 yearsHigh Ki67 PI correlates with poor prognosisin patients >68 years
Oshima et al.200570WTS1000n.s.n.s.40%NoneNone
Czyzewska et al.2009100WTS10 HPFn.s.n.s.50%High Ki67 PI in pT3/4 respectively pN2 tumorsNone
Tsamandas et al.2009110WTS50025.330.0MedianHigh Ki67 PI in G3/G4 tumorsHigh Ki67 PI correlates with poor prognosis
Lee et al.2010245TMA30023.115.70–10%, 11–20%, 21–30%. 31–40%,41–50%, >50%High Ki67 in G1/G2, pT1/2, pN0 tumorsHigh Ki67 correlates with good prognosis
Lazar et al.201067WTS50046.2n.s.45%High Ki67 in patients >60 years, cardia tumors, papillary adenocarcinoma, G3 tumorsNone
He et al.2012166TMA1000n.s.n.s.0–4%, 5–25%, 26–50%, >50%n.e.High Ki67 PI correlates with poor prognosis
Kroepil et al.2013163TMAn.s.n.s.7MedianNonen.e.
Xiao et al.2013413TMA100n.s.n.s.0%, 1–50%, 50–74%, 75–100%High Ki67 in UICC stage I tumorsNone
Wu et al.2014101WTSn.s.n.s.n.s.0–10%, 11–50%, 51–75%, >75%High Ki67 in poorly differentiate tumors, tumors with lymph node metastasis, UICC stage III‐/IV‐tumors, Her2/neu‐positive tumorsn.e.
Saricanbaz et al.201450WTSn.s.n.s.n.s.0–5%, 6–30%, 30–60%, 61–100%NoneNone

WTS, whole tissue sections; TMA, tissue microarray; n.s., not specified; n.e., not evaluated.

Literature Review WTS, whole tissue sections; TMA, tissue microarray; n.s., not specified; n.e., not evaluated. Thus, the vast majority of former studies, which have investigated the significance of Ki67 PI in GC might have been biased by methodological issues. In the present study, we intended to circumvent this problem and explored for the first time systematically the value of TMAs for the assessment of KI67 PI in GC by comparing staining with WTS obtained from the same paraffin blocks. With regard to Ki67 scoring standardization, it is generally difficult to determine a single useful cut‐off point: Firstly, Ki67 displays a continuous distribution; secondly, Ki67 is highly capable of being influenced by pre‐analytical and analytical variables. In breast cancer, where Ki67 is routinely used as a part of a multi‐parameter prognostic biomarker, substantial variability in Ki67 scoring is known to be present among some of the world's most experienced laboratories. As a consequence, Ki67 values and cut‐offs cannot be transferred between different laboratories without standardizing scoring methodology 34, 35. It is recommended that Ki67 scores should be interpreted in the light of local laboratory values, instead of suggesting a universally valid cut‐off value 36. Consequently, we abstained from applying defined cut‐off values as previously done in many other studies, and chose an evaluation of the raw Ki67 values and additionally a separation by the median and into quartiles instead, as this is the most reliable way to consider interlaboratory variability.

Ki67 Is a Potential Indicator of Intratumoral Heterogeneity

Intratumoral genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity is another major risk for sampling errors, as smaller tissue samples, for example, biopsies, bear the risk of being not representative for the entire tumor mass. Although, it is well known in GC, for example, in the evaluation of the Her2/neu status, it is widely neglected in most biomarker studies 15, 37. Heterogeneity may not solely be present among cases of a particular tumor type, but also within an individual cancer with subclones that might response variably to anti‐cancer drugs. Thus, biomarkers with the ability to indicate intratumoral heterogeneity are urgently needed. Interestingly, Ramires et al. already described distinct intratumoral Ki67 expression patterns in GC that correlated significantly with the Laurén phenotype. They observed that subgroups of GCs showed an increased Ki67 expression within the tumor surface compared to deeper tumor areas, and vice versa. Moreover, a “focal clustering” was also described in a subset of GCs 23. In addition to these previous findings, we noticed that three distinct Ki67 expression patterns are present in GC, and that two of them showed a heterogeneous Ki67‐expression pattern that might indicate intratumoral heterogeneity.

TMAs Are Unsuitable for the Ki67 PI Evaluation in GC

In our patient series, only the minority of GCs showed an even, homogeneous intratumoral distribution of Ki67‐positive tumor cells. We made similar observations with regard to heterogeneous expression of HER2 and MET in GC and came to the conclusion that TMAs, like any other tissue biopsy, carry the risk of a sampling error 15, 38. This risk is exemplified by: (i) the fact that the mean Ki67 PI evaluated on TMAs underestimated the Ki67 PI by 16.9%; and (ii) the moderate level of agreement between TMA and WTS, which raised to a good level of agreement if those tumors with a “homogeneous/diffuse” Ki67 expression pattern were evaluated separately. These findings lead to the conjecture that studies using TMAs only, carry the risk of a sampling error due to a non‐representative evaluation and systematic underestimation of the Ki67 PI in GC.

The Ki67 PI Does Not Depend on Sample Age

Collecting sufficient patient numbers is time consuming, and storage of paraffin blocks and changes in pre‐analytical procedures may lead to antigen degradation/modification influencing test results 39. The tissue samples of our study were collected over a period of 12 years and had been stored between 6 and 18 years prior to study execution. However, in our series no correlation was found between sample age and neither quantity nor intensity of Ki67 immunostaining, neither for WTS nor for TMAs. Thus, sample age does not influence the test result of the KI67 PI.

The Ki67 PI Is Correlated Significantly With the Laurén Phenotype and Tumor Grade, But Has No Prognostic Value in GC

The conclusion that a high amount of proliferating tumor cells indicates a fast growing tumor with an increased potential to metastasize and a worse prognosis has been recently discussed controversially 40. Contradictory to most previous studies, Lee et al. stated that highly proliferative tumors possess less invasive subclones and thus, have a less aggressive metastatic potential that results in a better patient prognosis 22. Nevertheless, Lee's findings are compromised by their use of TMAs and thereby may have missed intratumoral heterogeneity of GC. Neither previous finding, that is, positive or negative prediction of patient prognosis, could be confirmed in our cohort. Interestingly, the Ki67 PI correlated with the Laurén phenotype and the tumor grade, and a significant correlation between the distinct expression patterns and the Laurén phenotype was also observed. The molecular classification of GC 18 also correlates to some extent with the Laurén phenotype: Genomically stable GCs were enriched in the diffuse type GC, which also showed most commonly a homogeneous Ki67 PI in our cohort. The chromosomal instable GCs were more commonly associated with an intestinal phenotype, which in our analysis most frequently harbored a heterogeneous/clonal Ki67 distribution. Chromosomal instable GCs often show amplification of receptor tyrosine kinases and our previous studies on the same cohort confirmed the occurrence of intratumoral heterogeneity with HER2 or MET‐amplified and unamplified tumor cell clones, respectively, within the same patient 15, 38. Thus, Ki67 PI in GC may be linked to the Laurén phenotype based on molecular biological differences (genomically stable vs. genomically instable) rather than indicators of patient prognosis. Indeed, Ki67 PI assessed on WTS did not correlate with patient survival at all in our series, neither for the entire cohort nor for the subgroup analysis of intestinal‐ and diffuse‐type GCs. While interpreting our findings, it should be kept in mind that the proliferation rate of a tumor is a temporal snap‐shot and may provide no information about the history or future development of the individual cancer. In future studies, the presence of the three distinct Ki67 expression patterns needs to be correlated with other indicators of intratumoral heterogeneity, especially molecular characteristics. Summing up, the present study is the first that considers (and eliminates) the risks of sampling errors when using TMAs (or biopsies) of GCs. The assessment of Ki67 in archival tissue samples is not influenced by intralaboratory pre‐analytical variables (e.g., storage time) and is unsuitable as a prognostic biomarker for GC. However, Ki67 may unravel tumor heterogeneity, and future studies should pay special attention to a standardized evaluation and appropriate and representative tissue sampling.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

CB conceived and carried out experiments and analyzed data. CR conceived experiments. HMB analyzed data. All authors were involved in writing the paper and had final approval of the submitted manuscript.

ETHICS

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent or substitute for it was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethical review board (D 453/10). Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web‐site. File S1. Correlation of Ki67 in tissue microarrays (TMAs) and whole tissue sections (WTS) within the different expression patterns. The application of TMAs bears the risk of a systematic underestimation of the Ki67 PI, which is moderate in tumors with and homogenous/“diffuse” Ki67 expression pattern (a) but especially high in tumors with a heterogeneous expression pattern with an increased Ki67 at the tumor surface and/or the invasion front (b) respectively tumors with an heterogeneous/“clonal” Ki67 expression pattern (c). Click here for additional data file. File S2. Box‐plots illustrate the distribution of the Ki67 PI within the subgroups of the 17 tested clinico‐pathological patient characteristics. Click here for additional data file. File S3.Correlation between clinico‐pathological patient characteristics and overall as well as tumor specific patient survival. Click here for additional data file.
  38 in total

1.  THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  P LAUREN
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1965

2.  Ki-67 proliferation index and gastric cancer: answers or more questions.

Authors:  Cletus A Arciero
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015.

Authors:  A S Coates; E P Winer; A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; M Gnant; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Grading of neuroendocrine neoplasms: mitoses and Ki-67 are both essential.

Authors:  Marie-Louise F van Velthuysen; Emma J Groen; Vincent van der Noort; Arjen van de Pol; Margot E T Tesselaar; Catharina M Korse
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.914

5.  Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation.

Authors:  J Gerdes; U Schwab; H Lemke; H Stein
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1983-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Seventh edition (2010) of the AJCC/UICC staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  Manali I Patel; Kim F Rhoads; Yifei Ma; James M Ford; Brendan C Visser; Pamela L Kunz; George A Fisher; Daniel T Chang; Albert Koong; Jeffrey A Norton; George A Poultsides
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Prognostic and putative predictive biomarkers of gastric cancer for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Viktoria S Warneke; Hans-Michael Behrens; Jochen Haag; Katharina Balschun; Christine Böger; Thomas Becker; Matthias P A Ebert; Florian Lordick; Christoph Röcken
Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol       Date:  2013-09

8.  Ki-67 is a valuable prognostic predictor of lymphoma but its utility varies in lymphoma subtypes: evidence from a systematic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin He; Zhigang Chen; Tao Fu; Xueli Jin; Teng Yu; Yun Liang; Xiaoying Zhao; Liansheng Huang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of Ki-67, caspase-3 and p53 expression in gastric carcinomas.

Authors:  Li-Jun Xiao; Shuang Zhao; En-Hong Zhao; Xin Zheng; Wen-Feng Gou; Yasuo Takano; Hua-Chuan Zheng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  MET in gastric cancer--discarding a 10% cutoff rule.

Authors:  Marie-Luise Metzger; Hans-Michael Behrens; Christine Böger; Jochen Haag; Sandra Krüger; Christoph Röcken
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.087

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  [Gastric tumors and tumor precursors].

Authors:  C Röcken
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  Clinicopathologic significance and prognostic value of Ki-67 expression in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guanying Luo; Yunzhao Hu; Zhiqiao Zhang; Peng Wang; Zhaowen Luo; Jinxin Lin; Canchang Cheng; You Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-25

3.  Helicobacter pylori infection-induced H3Ser10 phosphorylation in stepwise gastric carcinogenesis and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Tao-Tao Yang; Na Cao; Hai-Hui Zhang; Jian-Bo Wei; Xiao-Xia Song; Dong-Min Yi; Shuai-Heng Chao; Li-Da Zhang; Ling-Fei Kong; Shuang-Yin Han; Yu-Xiu Yang; Song-Ze Ding
Journal:  Helicobacter       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Dual Energy Spectral CT Imaging in the assessment of Gastric Cancer and cell proliferation: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Sai-Ming Cheng; Wei Ling; Jiong Zhu; Jian-Rong Xu; Lian-Ming Wu; Hong-Xia Gong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Ki-67/MKI67 as a Predictive Biomarker for Clinical Outcome in Gastric Cancer Patients: an Updated Meta-analysis and Systematic Review involving 53 Studies and 7078 Patients.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Xiong; Chu-Mei Zeng; Ling Jiang; Dian-Zhong Luo; Gang Chen
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Low BUB1 expression is an adverse prognostic marker in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  David Stahl; Martin Braun; Andrew J Gentles; Philipp Lingohr; Adeline Walter; Glen Kristiansen; Ines Gütgemann
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

7.  Troy is expressed in human stomach mucosa and a novel putative prognostic marker of intestinal type gastric cancer.

Authors:  Franziska Wilhelm; Christine Böger; Sandra Krüger; Hans-Michael Behrens; Christoph Röcken
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-18

8.  Tracking the tumor invasion front using long-term fluidic tumoroid culture.

Authors:  Koh Meng Aw Yong; Zida Li; Sofia D Merajver; Jianping Fu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Ki-67 labeling index as a prognostic marker in advanced stomach cancer.

Authors:  Sang Hyuk Seo; Kwang Hee Kim; Sang Hoon Oh; Yunseon Choi; Ki Jung Ahn; Ji Young Lee; Sang Min Lee; Jisun Park; Woo Gyeong Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 1.859

10.  Overexpression of B7H5/CD28H is associated with worse survival in human gastric cancer.

Authors:  Can Hu; Zhiyuan Xu; Shangqi Chen; Hang Lv; Yiping Wang; Xiaofeng Wang; Shaowei Mo; Chengwei Shi; Shenyu Wei; Liqiang Hu; Wei Chen; Xiangdong Cheng
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 5.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.