Literature DB >> 23149854

Seventh edition (2010) of the AJCC/UICC staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: is there room for improvement?

Manali I Patel1, Kim F Rhoads, Yifei Ma, James M Ford, Brendan C Visser, Pamela L Kunz, George A Fisher, Daniel T Chang, Albert Koong, Jeffrey A Norton, George A Poultsides.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gastric cancer AJCC/UICC staging system recently underwent significant revisions, but studies on Asian patients have reported a lack of adequate discrimination between various consecutive stages. We sought to validate the new system on a U.S. population database.
METHODS: California Cancer Registry data linked to the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development discharge abstracts were used to identify patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (esophagogastric junction and gastric cardia tumors excluded) who underwent curative-intent surgical resection in California from 2002 to 2006. AJCC/UICC stage was recalculated based on the latest seventh edition. Overall survival probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Of 1905 patients analyzed, 54 % were males with a median age of 70 years. Median number of pathologically examined lymph nodes was 12 (range, 1-90); 40 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 31 % received adjuvant radiotherapy. The seventh edition AJCC/UICC system did not distinguish outcome adequately between stages IB and IIA (P = 0.40), or IIB and IIIA (P = 0.34). By merging stage II into 1 category and moving T2N1 to stage IB and T2N2, T1N3 to stage IIIA, we propose a new grouping system with improved discriminatory ability
CONCLUSIONS: In this first study validating the new seventh edition AJCC/UICC staging system for gastric cancer on a U.S. population with a relatively limited number of lymph nodes examined, we found stages IB and IIA, as well as IIB and IIIA to perform similarly. We propose a revised stage grouping for the AJCC/UICC staging system that better discriminates between outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23149854     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2724-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Gastric tumors and tumor precursors].

Authors:  C Röcken
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Implication of lymph node staging in migration and different treatment strategies for stage T2N0M0 and T1N1M0 resected gastric cancer: a SEER population analysis.

Authors:  Y Wang; J Zhang; S Guo; Z Dong; X Meng; G Zheng; D Yang; Z Zheng; Y Zhao
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Evaluation of the seventh AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Jizhun Zhang; Yangbing Zhou; Kewei Jiang; Zhanlong Shen; Yingjiang Ye; Shan Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-03

4.  Evaluating TNM stage prognostic ability in a population-based cohort of gastric adenocarcinoma patients in a low-incidence country.

Authors:  Alyson L Mahar; Brandon Zagorski; Daniel Kagedan; Matthew Dixon; Abraham El-Sedfy; Jovanka Vasilevska-Ristovska; Daniela Cortinovis; Corwyn Rowsell; Calvin Law; Lucy Helyer; Lawrence Paszat; Natalie Coburn
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2018-08-08

5.  Validation of the 7th AJCC/UICC staging system for gastric cancer and a proposal for a new TNM system based on a prognostic score: a retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Oh Kyoung Kwon; Se Won Kim; Hyun-Dong Chae; Seung Wan Ryu; Ho Young Chung; Sang Woon Kim; Won Kee Lee; Wansik Yu
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 6.  Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: Impact on prognosis and specific therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Simon Pernot; Thibault Voron; Geraldine Perkins; Christine Lagorce-Pages; Anne Berger; Julien Taieb
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  The Ratio-Based N Staging System Can More Accurately Reflect the Prognosis of T4 Gastric Cancer Patients with D2 Lymphadenectomy Compared with the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Staging System.

Authors:  Sung Hwan Hwang; Hyun Il Kim; Jun Seong Song; Min Hong Lee; Sung Joon Kwon; Min Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.720

8.  Ki67--An unsuitable marker of gastric cancer prognosis unmasks intratumoral heterogeneity.

Authors:  Christine Böger; Hans-Michael Behrens; Christoph Röcken
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Low BUB1 expression is an adverse prognostic marker in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  David Stahl; Martin Braun; Andrew J Gentles; Philipp Lingohr; Adeline Walter; Glen Kristiansen; Ines Gütgemann
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

10.  A comprehensive analysis comparing the eighth AJCC gastric cancer pathological classification to the seventh, sixth, and fifth editions.

Authors:  Sharvesh Raj Seeruttun; Shuqiang Yuan; Haibo Qiu; Yun Huang; Yuanfang Li; Yao Liang; Yuanxiang Guan; Youqing Zhan; Wei Li; Yingbo Chen; Xiaowei Sun; Dazhi Xu; Zhiwei Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.