Literature DB >> 26708630

Magnetic resonance thermometry: Methodology, pitfalls and practical solutions.

Lukas Winter1, Eva Oberacker1, Katharina Paul1, Yiyi Ji1, Celal Oezerdem1, Pirus Ghadjar2, Alexander Thieme2, Volker Budach2, Peter Wust2, Thoralf Niendorf1,3,4.   

Abstract

Clinically established thermal therapies such as thermoablative approaches or adjuvant hyperthermia treatment rely on accurate thermal dose information for the evaluation and adaptation of the thermal therapy. Intratumoural temperature measurements have been correlated successfully with clinical end points. Magnetic resonance imaging is the most suitable technique for non-invasive thermometry avoiding complications related to invasive temperature measurements. Since the advent of MR thermometry two decades ago, numerous MR thermometry techniques have been developed, continuously increasing accuracy and robustness for in vivo applications. While this progress was primarily focused on relative temperature mapping, current and future efforts will likely close the gap towards quantitative temperature readings. These efforts are essential to benchmark thermal therapy efficiency, to understand temperature-related biophysical and physiological processes and to use these insights to set new landmarks for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. With that in mind, this review summarises and discusses advances in MR thermometry, providing practical considerations, pitfalls and technical obstacles constraining temperature measurement accuracy, spatial and temporal resolution in vivo. Established approaches and current trends in thermal therapy hardware are surveyed with respect to potential benefits for MR thermometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; ablation; focused ultrasound; hyperthermia; thermal MR; thermal therapies; thermometry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26708630     DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1108462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  29 in total

1.  Experimental measurement of microwave ablation heating pattern and comparison to computer simulations.

Authors:  Garron Deshazer; Punit Prakash; Derek Merck; Dieter Haemmerich
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 2.  Ultrasound Hyperthermia Technology for Radiosensitization.

Authors:  Lifei Zhu; Michael B Altman; Andrei Laszlo; William Straube; Imran Zoberi; Dennis E Hallahan; Hong Chen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Imaging-based internal body temperature measurements: The journal Temperature toolbox.

Authors:  Juho Raiko; Kalle Koskensalo; Teija Sainio
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2020-05-29

4.  Analysis of iodinated contrast delivered during thermal ablation: is material trapped in the ablation zone?

Authors:  Po-Hung Wu; Chris L Brace
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Contactless Thermometry by MRI and MRS: Advanced Methods for Thermotherapy and Biomaterials.

Authors:  Norbert W Lutz; Monique Bernard
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-09-14

6.  Experimental assessment of microwave ablation computational modeling with MR thermometry.

Authors:  Pegah Faridi; Paul Keselman; Hojjatollah Fallahi; Punit Prakash
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  High-resolution intravascular MRI-guided perivascular ultrasound ablation.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Liu; Nicholas Ellens; Emery Williams; Everette C Burdette; Parag Karmarkar; Clifford R Weiss; Dara Kraitchman; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review.

Authors:  H Petra Kok; Erik N K Cressman; Wim Ceelen; Christopher L Brace; Robert Ivkov; Holger Grüll; Gail Ter Haar; Peter Wust; Johannes Crezee
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.914

9.  Feasibility and safety assessment of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU)-mediated mild hyperthermia in pelvic targets evaluated using an in vivo porcine model.

Authors:  Lifei Zhu; Ari Partanen; Michael R Talcott; H Michael Gach; Suellen C Greco; Lauren E Henke; Jessika A Contreras; Imran Zoberi; Dennis E Hallahan; Hong Chen; Michael B Altman
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.914

10.  T2 mapping as a predictor of nonperfused volume in MRgFUS treatment of desmoid tumors.

Authors:  Simona Morochnik; Eugene Ozhinsky; Viola Rieke; Matthew D Bucknor
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.