Literature DB >> 26708450

Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) for the assessment of non-technical skills during resuscitation: Validation of the French version.

Maxime Maignan1, François-Xavier Koch2, Jordane Chaix2, Pierre Phellouzat2, Gery Binauld2, Roselyne Collomb Muret3, Simon J Cooper4, José Labarère5, Vincent Danel2, Damien Viglino6, Guillaume Debaty7.   

Abstract

AIM: Evaluation of team performances during medical simulation must rely on validated and reproducible tools. Our aim was to build and validate a French version of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) score, which was developed for the assessment of team performance and non-technical skills during resuscitation.
METHODS: A forward and backward translation of the initial TEAM score was made, with the agreement and the final validation by the original author. Ten medical teams were recruited and performed a standardized cardiac arrest simulation scenario. Teams were videotaped and nine raters evaluate non-technical skills for each team thanks to the French TEAM Score. Psychometric properties of the score were then evaluated.
RESULTS: French TEAM score showed an excellent reliability with a Cronbach coefficient of 0.95. Mean correlation coefficient between each item and the global score range was 0.78. The inter-rater reliability measured by intraclass correlation coefficient of the global score was 0.93. Finally, expert teams had higher French TEAM score than intermediate and novice teams.
CONCLUSION: The French TEAM score shows good psychometric properties to evaluate team performance during cardiac arrest simulation. Its utilization could help in the assessment of non-technical skills during simulation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrest; Non-technical skills; Patient simulation; Resuscitation; Teamwork

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26708450     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  9 in total

1.  Usability and reproducibility of three tools to assess medical students and residents in emergency medicine.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Philippon; Aurelien Baud; Margaux Dumont; Sidi Ahmed Remini; Jeremy Leroy; Jennifer Truchot; Emmanuel Triby; Yonathan Freund
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-08-01

2.  Non-technical skills in pre-hospital care in the Czech Republic: a prospective multicentric observational study (NTS study).

Authors:  David Peran; Roman Sykora; Jana Vidunova; Ivana Krsova; Jaroslav Pekara; Metodej Renza; Nikola Brizgalova; Patrik Ch Cmorej
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-05-13

3.  Improving patient safety through better teamwork: how effective are different methods of simulation debriefing? Protocol for a pragmatic, prospective and randomised study.

Authors:  Julia Freytag; Fabian Stroben; Wolf E Hautz; Dorothea Eisenmann; Juliane E Kämmer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Team performance training for medical students: Low vs high fidelity simulation.

Authors:  Marios Nicolaides; Efthymia Theodorou; Elif Iliria Emin; Iakovos Theodoulou; Nikolai Andersen; Nikolaos Lymperopoulos; Funlayo Odejinmi; Dilek Kitapcioglu; Mehmet Emin Aksoy; Apostolos Papalois; Michail Sideris
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-29

5.  Rating the quality of teamwork-a comparison of novice and expert ratings using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in simulated emergencies.

Authors:  Julia Freytag; Fabian Stroben; Wolf E Hautz; Stefan K Schauber; Juliane E Kämmer
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Measuring non-technical skills during prehospital advanced cardiac life support: A pilot study.

Authors:  Philippe Dewolf; Maïté Vanneste; Didier Desruelles; Lina Wauters
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-10-08

7.  Team emergency assessment measure (TEAM) of non-technical skills: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the TEAM tool.

Authors:  Fernando Rabioglio Giugni; Roger Daglius Dias; Caio Godoy Rodrigues; Henrique Trombini Pinesi; Augusto Scalabrini-Neto
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.898

8.  High-Fidelity Simulation to Assess Task Load Index and Performance: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Jérémy Favre-Félix; Mikhail Dziadzko; Christian Bauer; Antoine Duclos; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Thomas Rimmelé; Marc Lilot
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2022-08

9.  Effects of using a cognitive aid on content and feasibility of debriefings of simulated emergencies.

Authors:  Julia Freytag; Fabian Stroben; Wolf E Hautz; Dorothea Penders; Juliane E Kämmer
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.