Literature DB >> 26708406

Correlation between semitendinosus and gracilis tendon cross-sectional area determined using ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative tendon measurements.

Nikiforos Galanis1, Matthaios Savvidis2, Ioannis Tsifountoudis3, George Gkouvas2, Ilias Alafropatis1, John Kirkos1, Eleftherios Kellis4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation in semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (GT) tendon cross-sectional area (CSA) evaluated directly during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery and pre-operatively using ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A total of 14 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with a quadruple ST-GT graft by the same orthopaedic surgeon participated in this study. Pre-operative evaluation included determination of ST and GT CSA area using US and MRI. Intraoperative measurement of the diameters of the ST, GT and the final ACL graft using a closed-hole sizing block with 0.5-mm increments was made and this diameter was used to estimate tendon CSA. The correlation between graft diameter and CSA were 0.563 (GT) and 0.807 (ST) for MRI and 0.498 (GT) and 0.612 (ST) for US. The final ACL graft diameter displayed a correlation coefficient of 0.813 with MRI CSA and 0.518 with US CSA. No differences in CSA were observed between intraoperative, MRI and US methods (p>0.05). The intraclass correlation coefficients between the US, MRI and intraoperative graft methods for the ST and GT data ranged from 0.502 to 0.903 with an estimation error ranging from 1.41% to 2.26%. These results indicate that in clinical situations where MRI is contra-indicated or not accessible, US can provide measurable values which could predict sufficient diameter of the ACL graft. In addition, determination of tendon CSA using US displays errors less than 2% which is similar to that observed using MRI. This suggests that the application of US can be applied to in vivo examination of the ST and GT CSA.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL graft selection; ACL reconstruction; Architecture; Cross-sectional area; Graft size; Hamstrings; Imaging techniques; Tendon

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26708406     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  8 in total

1.  Prediction of Autograft Hamstring Size for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using MRI.

Authors:  Katharine Hollnagel; Brent M Johnson; Kelley K Whitmer; Andrew Hanna; Thomas K Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  In situ cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging significantly correlates with the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Ryo Kanto; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tsung-Min Lee; Wei-Ting Wu; Yi-Hsiang Chiu; Ke-Vin Chang; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Preoperative ultrasound predicts the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft more accurately than preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Preoperative Ultrasonography Is Unreliable in Predicting Hamstring Tendon Graft Diameter for ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Amit M Momaya; Clint Beicker; Paul Siffri; Michael J Kissenberth; Jeffrey Backes; Lane Bailey; Gabriel J Rulewicz; Jennifer M Mercuri; E Carlisle Shealy; John M Tokish; Charles A Thigpen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-01-03

6.  Optimal Cut-Off Value of the Coracohumeral Ligament Area as a Morphological Parameter to Confirm Frozen Shoulder.

Authors:  Hyung Rae Cho; Byong Hyon Cho; Keum Nae Kang; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prediction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Autograft Size and Comparison of Radiologist and Orthopaedic Surgeon Predictions.

Authors:  Andrew Hanna; Katharine Hollnagel; Kelley Whitmer; Christopher John; Brent Johnson; Jonathan Godin; Thomas Miller
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-12-13

8.  Predicting autologous hamstring graft diameter and finding reliable measurement levels in the Zhuang population using preoperative ultrasonography.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Huang; Hong-Yu Zheng; Ze-Feng Shi; Hui-Hui Yang; Bing Zhang; Xiao-Chun Yang; Hong Wang; Ru-Xin Tan
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.755

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.