Literature DB >> 2670768

Human error in anesthetic mishaps.

D M Gaba1.   

Abstract

While adverse outcomes linked to anesthesia are uncommon in healthy patients, they do occasionally happen. There is rarely a single cause. Anesthesia and surgery bring the patient into a complex world in which innumerable small failings can converge to produce an eventual catastrophe. And for all the technology involved, the anesthesiologist remains the cornerstone of safe anesthesia care, protecting the patient from harm regardless of its source. Responding to the demands of the operating room environment requires on-the-spot decision making in a complex, uncertain, and risky setting. Only responsible, professional human beings acting in concert can perform this task; no machine that we devise now or in the foreseeable future will suffice. I have outlined the components of a dynamic decision-making process that successfully protects patients in almost all cases. However, being human, anesthesiologists do make errors along the way--errors we are just beginning to understand. Sometimes these errors are due to faulty vigilance or incompetence, but usually they are made by appropriately trained, competent practitioners. Anesthesiologists can err in many ways, and recognizing these ways makes it easier to analyze the events leading to an anesthetic accident. More importantly, it better equips us to eliminate or minimize them in the future--and this is the real challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2670768     DOI: 10.1097/00004311-198902730-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin        ISSN: 0020-5907


  15 in total

1.  A systems approach to surgical safety.

Authors:  J F Calland; S Guerlain; R B Adams; C G Tribble; E Foley; E G Chekan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. 1995.

Authors:  Y Donchin; D Gopher; M Olin; Y Badihi; M Biesky; C L Sprung; R Pizov; S Cotev
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

3.  Evaluation of two new ecological interface approaches for the anesthesia workplace.

Authors:  A Jungk; B Thull; A Hoeft; G Rau
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Ergonomic evaluation of an ecological interface and a profilogram display for hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  A Jungk; B Thull; A Hoeft; G Rau
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Accident analysis of large-scale technological disasters applied to an anaesthetic complication.

Authors:  C J Eagle; J M Davies; J Reason
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  The present and future medicolegal importance of record keeping in anesthesia and intensive care: the case for automation.

Authors:  D M Gaba
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1990-10

7.  Clinical risk management in anaesthesia.

Authors:  J S Walker; M Wilson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-06

Review 8.  Improving patient safety in hospitals: Contributions of high-reliability theory and normal accident theory.

Authors:  Michal Tamuz; Michael I Harrison
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice.

Authors:  S M Dovey; D S Meyers; R L Phillips; L A Green; G E Fryer; J M Galliher; J Kappus; P Grob
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-09

10.  The pathophysiology of medication errors: how and where they arise.

Authors:  Sarah E McDowell; Harriet S Ferner; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.