Literature DB >> 26707455

Electronic health record phenotyping improves detection and screening of type 2 diabetes in the general United States population: A cross-sectional, unselected, retrospective study.

Ariana E Anderson1, Wesley T Kerr2, April Thames1, Tong Li1, Jiayang Xiao1, Mark S Cohen3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: An estimated 25% of type two diabetes mellitus (DM2) patients in the United States are undiagnosed due to inadequate screening, because it is prohibitive to administer laboratory tests to everyone. We assess whether electronic health record (EHR) phenotyping could improve DM2 screening compared to conventional models, even when records are incomplete and not recorded systematically across patients and practice locations, as is typically seen in practice.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional, retrospective study, EHR data from 9948 US patients were used to develop a pre-screening tool to predict current DM2, using multivariate logistic regression and a random-forests probabilistic model for out-of-sample validation. We compared (1) a full EHR model containing commonly prescribed medications, diagnoses (as ICD9 categories), and conventional predictors, (2) a restricted EHR DX model which excluded medications, and (3) a conventional model containing basic predictors and their interactions (BMI, age, sex, smoking status, hypertension).
RESULTS: Using a patient's full EHR or restricted EHR was superior to using basic covariates alone for detecting individuals with diabetes (hierarchical X(2) test, p<0.001). Migraines, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, and cardiac dysrhythmias were associated negatively with DM2, while sexual and gender identity disorder diagnosis, viral and chlamydial infections, and herpes zoster were associated positively. Adding EHR phenotypes improved classification; the AUC for the full EHR Model, EHR DX model, and conventional model using logistic regression, were 84.9%, 83.2%, and 75.0% respectively. For random forest machine learning out-of-sample prediction, accuracy also was improved when using EHR phenotypes; the AUC values were 81.3%, 79.6%, and 74.8%, respectively. Improved AUCs reflect better performance for most thresholds that balance sensitivity and specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: EHR phenotyping resulted in markedly superior detection of DM2, even in the face of missing and unsystematically recorded data, based on the ROC curves. EHR phenotypes could more efficiently identify which patients do require, and don't require, further laboratory screening. When applied to the current number of undiagnosed individuals in the United States, we predict that incorporating EHR phenotype screening would identify an additional 400,000 patients with active, untreated diabetes compared to the conventional pre-screening models.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic health records; Evidence-based medicine; Phenotype; Population screening; Type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26707455      PMCID: PMC5679210          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  23 in total

Review 1.  Definition of metabolic syndrome: Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition.

Authors:  Scott M Grundy; H Bryan Brewer; James I Cleeman; Sidney C Smith; Claude Lenfant
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Back to Wilson and Jungner: 10 good reasons to screen for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ann M Sheehy; Douglas B Coursin; Robert A Gabbay
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Age at initiation and frequency of screening to detect type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Richard Kahn; Peter Alperin; David Eddy; Knut Borch-Johnsen; John Buse; Justin Feigelman; Edward Gregg; Rury R Holman; M Sue Kirkman; Michael Stern; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Nick J Wareham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Validation of electronic medical record-based phenotyping algorithms: results and lessons learned from the eMERGE network.

Authors:  Katherine M Newton; Peggy L Peissig; Abel Ngo Kho; Suzette J Bielinski; Richard L Berg; Vidhu Choudhary; Melissa Basford; Christopher G Chute; Iftikhar J Kullo; Rongling Li; Jennifer A Pacheco; Luke V Rasmussen; Leslie Spangler; Joshua C Denny
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Undiagnosed NIDDM: clinical and public health issues.

Authors:  M I Harris
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study.

Authors:  X R Pan; G W Li; Y H Hu; J X Wang; W Y Yang; Z X An; Z X Hu; J Lin; J Z Xiao; H B Cao; P A Liu; X G Jiang; Y Y Jiang; J P Wang; H Zheng; H Zhang; P H Bennett; B V Howard
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Risk score for prediction of 10 year dementia risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a cohort study.

Authors:  Lieza G Exalto; Geert Jan Biessels; Andrew J Karter; Elbert S Huang; Wayne J Katon; Jerome R Minkoff; Rachel A Whitmer
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 32.069

8.  Type 2 diabetes risk forecasting from EMR data using machine learning.

Authors:  Subramani Mani; Yukun Chen; Tom Elasy; Warren Clayton; Joshua Denny
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

9.  Using electronic patient records to discover disease correlations and stratify patient cohorts.

Authors:  Francisco S Roque; Peter B Jensen; Henriette Schmock; Marlene Dalgaard; Massimo Andreatta; Thomas Hansen; Karen Søeby; Søren Bredkjær; Anders Juul; Thomas Werge; Lars J Jensen; Søren Brunak
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  23 in total

1.  CaliForest: Calibrated Random Forest for Health Data.

Authors:  Yubin Park; Joyce C Ho
Journal:  Proc ACM Conf Health Inference Learn (2020)       Date:  2020-04-02

2.  Careflow Mining Techniques to Explore Type 2 Diabetes Evolution.

Authors:  Arianna Dagliati; Valentina Tibollo; Giulia Cogni; Luca Chiovato; Riccardo Bellazzi; Lucia Sacchi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03

Review 3.  Clinical Information Systems as the Backbone of a Complex Information Logistics Process: Findings from the Clinical Information Systems Perspective for 2016.

Authors:  W O Hackl; T Ganslandt
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

4.  Psychosocial phenotyping as a personalization strategy for chronic disease self-management interventions.

Authors:  Miyong T Kim; Kavita Radhakrishnan; Elizabeth M Heitkemper; Eunju Choi; Marissa Burgermaster
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Predicting Progression Patterns of Type 2 Diabetes using Multi-sensor Measurements.

Authors:  Ramin Ramazi; Christine Perndorfer; Emily C Soriano; Jean-Philippe Laurenceau; Rahmatollah Beheshti
Journal:  Smart Health (Amst)       Date:  2021-06-12

6.  Development of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Phenotyping Framework Using Expert Knowledge and Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Rina Kagawa; Yoshimasa Kawazoe; Yusuke Ida; Emiko Shinohara; Katsuya Tanaka; Takeshi Imai; Kazuhiko Ohe
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-07

7.  Extraction of Ejection Fraction from Echocardiography Notes for Constructing a Cohort of Patients having Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF).

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Christina M Fischer; Alyssa Goodson; Christopher D Herrick; Martin Rees; Eloy Toscano; Calum A MacRae; Benjamin M Scirica; Akshay S Desai; Shawn N Murphy
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  High-throughput phenotyping with temporal sequences.

Authors:  Hossein Estiri; Zachary H Strasser; Shawn N Murphy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Remission of type 2 diabetes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: diabetes prediction score.

Authors:  Yeongkeun Kwon; Jin-Won Kwon; Jane Ha; Dohyang Kim; Jaehyeong Cho; Soo Min Jeon; Shin-Hoo Park; Jinseub Hwang; Nam Hoon Kim; Sungsoo Park
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Similarity-based health risk prediction using Domain Fusion and electronic health records data.

Authors:  Jia Guo; Chi Yuan; Ning Shang; Tian Zheng; Natalie A Bello; Krzysztof Kiryluk; Chunhua Weng; Shuang Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 8.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.