Literature DB >> 26707337

Effect of various light curing times on the elution of composite components.

Christof Högg1,2, Moritz Maier3,4, Katherina Dettinger-Maier3,4, Xiuli He3, Lena Rothmund3,4, Kai Kehe4,5, Reinhard Hickel3, Franz-Xaver Reichl3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Polymerization of resin-based composites (RBCs) is incomplete. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a longer curing time than recommended by the manufacturer influences the amount of released composite components of RBCs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The composites Clearfil AP-X and els extra low shrinkage were polymerized for six different curing times: 4, 10, 20, 40, 100, and 200 s. Light curing time recommended by the manufacturer for both composites is 20 s. Subsequently, samples were eluted in methanol and water for 1, 3, and 7 days and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
RESULTS: For Clearfil AP-X ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), diethylene glycol dimethacrylate (DEGDMA), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone (HMBP), camphorquinone (CQ) and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) were detected in methanol. In the aqueous eluate, only TEGDMA was detected. In els extra low shrinkage, HMBP, BHT, and CQ were detected in methanol.
CONCLUSION: Increasing the curing time compared to recommendation of the manufacturer reduces the release of most composite components. This could result in less exposure to human due to these substances. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Methacrylates are classified as potential allergens. An increasing number of dentists and patients show allergic reaction to methacrylates. Therefore, a reduced elution of composite components is an advantage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Composite components; Elution; Light curing time; Methacrylates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26707337     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1698-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  46 in total

1.  Analysis of temperature rise and the use of coolants in the dissipation of ultrasonic heat buildup during post removal.

Authors:  Stephen Davis; Alan H Gluskin; Philip M Livingood; David W Chambers
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Time-based elution of TEGDMA and BisGMA from resin composite cured with LED, QTH and high-intensity QTH lights.

Authors:  Adil Nalçaci; Nuran Ulusoy; Orhan Atakol
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.440

3.  Biomonitoring of DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of subjects with dental restorative fillings.

Authors:  Angela Di Pietro; Giuseppa Visalli; Sebastiano La Maestra; Rosanna Micale; Barbara Baluce; Giovanni Matarese; Luciano Cingano; Maria Elena Scoglio
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Active sensitization to camphoroquinone and double active sensitization to acrylics with long-lasting patch test reactions.

Authors:  K Malanin
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Silorane and Methacrylate based Dental Composites using Human Gingival Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Prashanthi Sampath Madhyastha; Dilip G Naik; Ravindra Kotian; Divya Padma; N Srikant; Kumar M R Bhat
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-01-01

6.  Contact allergy to (meth)acrylates in the dental series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens.

Authors:  Anthony T J Goon; Marléne Isaksson; Erik Zimerson; Chee Leok Goh; Magnus Bruze
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Identification of 2,3-epoxymethacrylic acid as an intermediate in the metabolism of dental materials in human liver microsomes.

Authors:  Mario Seiss; Siegfried Nitz; Norbert Kleinsasser; Jeroen T M Buters; Heidrun Behrendt; Reinhard Hickel; Franz X Reichl
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Toxicity potentiation by H2O2 with components of dental restorative materials on human oral cells.

Authors:  Franz-Xaver Reichl; Mario Seiss; Wolfgang Marquardt; Norbert Kleinsasser; Helmut Schweikl; Kai Kehe; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Guinea Pig Maximization Test of tri-ethylene glycol mono-methacrylate.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyama; Atsufumi Manabe; Chihiro Tani; Yoichi Takahashi; Kazuo Itoh; Hisashi Hisamitsu
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Epigallocatechin-3-gallate blocks triethylene glycol dimethacrylate-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression by suppressing extracellular signal-regulated kinase in human dental pulp and embryonic palatal mesenchymal cells.

Authors:  Wan-Hsien Yang; Yi-Ting Deng; Mark Yen-Ping Kuo; Cheing-Meei Liu; Hao-Hueng Chang; Jenny Zwei-Chieng Chang
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.171

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effects of extended curing time and radiant energy on microhardness and temperature rise of conventional and bulk-fill resin composites.

Authors:  Matej Par; Igor Repusic; Hrvoje Skenderovic; Ognjen Milat; Jelena Spajic; Zrinka Tarle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Meta-analytical analysis on components released from resin-based dental materials.

Authors:  Francesco De Angelis; Nela Sarteur; Michal Šteffl; Camillo D'Arcangelo; Matteo Buonvivere; Mirco Vadini
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.606

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.