Literature DB >> 26706610

Diverting ileostomy versus no diversion after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.

Karl Mrak1, Stefan Uranitsch2, Florian Pedross3, Andreas Heuberger4, Anton Klingler3, Michael Jagoditsch1, Dominik Weihs1, Thomas Eberl1, Jörg Tschmelitsch5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine whether a protective diverting ileostomy improves short-term outcomes in patients with rectal resection and colonic J-pouch reconstruction for low anastomoses. Criteria for the use of a proximal stoma in rectal resections with colonic J-pouch reconstruction have not been defined sufficiently.
METHODS: In a multicenter prospective study, rectal cancer patients with anastomoses below 8 cm treated with low anterior resection and colonic J-pouch were randomized to a defunctioning loop ileostomy or no ileostomy. The primary study endpoint was the rate of anastomotic leakage, and the secondary endpoints were surgical complications related to primary surgery, stoma, or stoma closure.
RESULTS: From 2004 to 2014, a total of 166 patients were randomized to 1 of the 2 study groups. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the overall leakage rate was 5.8% in the stoma group and 16.3% in the no stoma group (P = .0441). However, some patients were not treated according to randomization and only 70% of our patients with low anastomoses received a pouch. Therefore, we performed a second analysis as to actual treatment. In this analysis, as well, leakage rates (P = .044) and reoperation rates for leakage (P = .021) were significantly higher in patients without a stoma. In multivariate analysis, male gender (P = .0267) and the absence of a stoma (P = .0092) were significantly associated with anastomotic leakage.
CONCLUSION: Defunctioning loop ileostomy should be fashioned in rectal cancer patients with anastomoses below 6 cm, particularly in male patients, even if reconstruction was done with a J-pouch.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26706610     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  27 in total

1.  Meta-analysis and single-center experience on the protective effect of negative suction drains on wound healing after stoma reversal.

Authors:  Philipp-Alexander Neumann; Stefan Reischl; Felix Berg; Carsten Jäger; Helmut Friess; Daniel Reim; Güralp O Ceyhan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Who needs diverting ileostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients? Analysis of 417 patients in a single institute.

Authors:  Hiroki Shimizu; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Toshimasa Ishii; Hiroka Kondo; Kiyoka Hara; Kenichi Takemoto; Shintaro Ishikawa; Takuhisa Okada; Asami Suzuki; Isamu Koyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Pelvic Anastomosis Without Protective Ileostomy is Safe in Patients Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ekaterina Baron; Vadim Gushchin; Mary Caitlin King; Andrei Nikiforchin; Armando Sardi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  First, Do No Harm: Rethinking Routine Diversion in Sphincter-Preserving Rectal Cancer Resection.

Authors:  William C Chapman; Melanie Subramanian; Senthil Jayarajan; Bilal Makhdoom; Matthew G Mutch; Steven Hunt; Matthew L Silviera; Sean C Glasgow; Margaret A Olsen; Paul E Wise
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Local Cancer Recurrence: The Realities, Challenges, and Opportunities for New Therapies.

Authors:  David A Mahvi; Rong Liu; Mark W Grinstaff; Yolonda L Colson; Chandrajit P Raut
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Diverting Ostomy: For Whom, When, What, Where, and Why.

Authors:  Alexis Plasencia; Heidi Bahna
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-04-02

7.  Standardization of surgical procedures to reduce risk of anastomotic leakage, reoperation, and surgical site infection in colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 1189 patients.

Authors:  Ken Eto; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Makoto Kosuge; Masahisa Ohkuma; Rota Noaki; Kai Neki; Daisuke Ito; Yasuhiro Takeda; Hiroshi Sugano; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Surgical management of complicated rectovaginal fistulas and the role of omentoplasty.

Authors:  E Schloericke; M Zimmermann; C Benecke; T Laubert; R Meyer; H-P Bruch; R Bouchard; T Keck; M Hoffmann
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Virtual ileostomy in elective colorectal surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I Baloyiannis; K Perivoliotis; A Diamantis; G Tzovaras
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Diverting Stoma Versus No Diversion in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection: A Single-center Retrospective Study in Japan.

Authors:  Liming Wang; Yasumitsu Hirano; Toshimasa Ishii; Hiroka Kondo; Kiyoka Hara; Nao Obara; Pauleon Tan; Shigeki Yamaguchi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.