Literature DB >> 26706568

Short term effect of air pollution, noise and heat waves on preterm births in Madrid (Spain).

Virginia Arroyo1, Julio Díaz1, Cristina Ortiz1, Rocío Carmona1, Marc Sáez2, Cristina Linares3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (PTB) refers to delivery before 37 weeks of gestation and represents the leading cause of early-life mortality and morbidity in developed countries. PTB can lead to serious infant health outcomes. The etiology of PTB remains uncertain, but epidemiologic studies have consistently shown elevated risks with different environmental variables as traffic-related air pollution (TRAP). The aim of the study was to evaluate with time series methodology the short-term effect of air pollutants, noise levels and ambient temperature on the number of births and preterm births occurred in Madrid City during the 2001-2009 period.
METHODS: A time-series analysis was performed to assess the short term impact of daily mean concentrations (µg/m(3)) of PM2.5 and PM10, O3 and NO2. Measurements of Acoustic Pollution in dB(A) analyzed were: Leqd, equivalent diurnal noise level and Leqn, equivalent nocturnal noise level. Maximum and Minimum daily temperature (°C), mean Humidity in the air (%) and Atmospheric Pressure (HPa), were included too. Linear trends, seasonality, as well as the autoregressive nature of the series itself were controlled. We added as covariate the day of the week too. Autoregressive over-dispersed Poisson regression models were performed and the environmental variables were included with short-term lags (from 0 to 7 days) in reference to the date of birth. Firstly, simple models for the total number of births and preterm births were done separately. In a second stage, a model for total births adjusted for preterm births was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 298,705 births were analyzed. The results of the final models were expressed in relative risks (RRs) for interquartile increase. We observed evidence of a short term effect at Lag 0, for the following environmental variables analyzed, PM2.5 (RR: 1.020; 95% CI:(1.008 1.032)) and O3 (RR: 1.012; 95% CI:(1.002 1.022)) concentrations and Leqd (RR: 1.139; 95% CI:( (1.124 1.154)) for the total number of births, and besides these, heat temperatures at Lag 1 (RR: 1.055; 95% CI:( (1.018 1.092)) on preterm births in Madrid City during the studied period. In the model adjusted for preterm births, similar RR was obtained for the same environmental variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Especially PM2.5, diurnal noise levels and O3 have a short-term impact on total births and heat temperatures on preterm births in Madrid City during the studied period. Our results suggest that, given the widespread exposure of the population to the environmental factors analyzed and the possible effects on long-term health associated to low birth weight. There is a clear need to minimize this exposure through the decrease of air pollution and noise levels and through the behavior modification of the mothers.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26706568     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  22 in total

1.  Environmental chemicals and preterm birth: Biological mechanisms and the state of the science.

Authors:  Kelly K Ferguson; Helen B Chin
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2017-01-27

2.  Examining the joint effects of heatwaves, air pollution, and green space on the risk of preterm birth in California.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Sindana D Ilango; Lara Schwarz; Qiong Wang; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Jean M Lawrence; Jun Wu; Tarik Benmarhnia
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 6.793

3.  Associations between PM2.5 and risk of preterm birth among liveborn infants.

Authors:  Breanna L Alman; Jeanette A Stingone; Mahsa Yazdy; Lorenzo D Botto; Tania A Desrosiers; Shannon Pruitt; Amy H Herring; Peter H Langlois; Wendy N Nembhard; Gary M Shaw; Andrew F Olshan; Thomas J Luben
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Effect of Environmental Factors on Low Weight in Non-Premature Births: A Time Series Analysis.

Authors:  Julio Díaz; Virginia Arroyo; Cristina Ortiz; Rocío Carmona; Cristina Linares
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Heat Exposure and Maternal Health in the Face of Climate Change.

Authors:  Leeann Kuehn; Sabrina McCormick
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Adverse Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Gordana Ristovska; Payam Dadvand
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Ambient Temperature and Early Delivery of Singleton Pregnancies.

Authors:  Sandie Ha; Danping Liu; Yeyi Zhu; Sung Soo Kim; Seth Sherman; Pauline Mendola
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Residential Proximity to Oil and Gas Development and Birth Outcomes in California: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 2006-2015 Births.

Authors:  Kathy V Tran; Joan A Casey; Lara J Cushing; Rachel Morello-Frosch
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Impact of London's road traffic air and noise pollution on birth weight: retrospective population based cohort study.

Authors:  Rachel B Smith; Daniela Fecht; John Gulliver; Sean D Beevers; David Dajnak; Marta Blangiardo; Rebecca E Ghosh; Anna L Hansell; Frank J Kelly; H Ross Anderson; Mireille B Toledano
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-12-05

10.  Decomposition Analysis of Black-White Disparities in Birth Outcomes: The Relative Contribution of Air Pollution and Social Factors in California.

Authors:  Tarik Benmarhnia; Jonathan Huang; Rupa Basu; Jun Wu; Tim A Bruckner
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.