Angela Wang1, Stephanie L Dybul2, Parag J Patel2, Sean M Tutton2, Cheong J Lee3, Sarah B White4. 1. School of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226. 2. Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226. 3. Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226. 4. Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226.. Electronic address: sbwhite@mcw.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate knowledge of interventional radiologists (IRs) and vascular surgeons (VSs) on the cost of common devices and procedures and to determine factors associated with differences in understanding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was administered to US faculty IRs and VSs. Demographic information and physicians' opinions on hospital costs were elicited. Respondents were asked to estimate the average price of 15 commonly used devices and to estimate the work relative value units (wRVUs) and average Medicare reimbursements for 10 procedures. Answer estimates were deemed correct if values were ± 25% of the actual costs. Multivariate logistical regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Of the 4,926 participants contacted, 1,090 (22.1%) completed the questionnaire. Overall, 19.8%, 22.8%, and 31.9% were accurate in price estimations of devices, Medicare reimbursement, and wRVUs for procedures. Physicians who thought themselves adequately educated about wRVUs were more accurate in predicting procedural costs in wRVUs than physicians who responded otherwise (odds ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.52; P < .0001). Estimation accuracies for procedures showed a positive trend in more experienced physicians (≥ 16 y), private practice physicians, and physicians who practice in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that IRs and VSs have limited knowledge regarding device costs. Given the current health care environment, more attention should be placed on cost education and awareness so that physicians can provide the most cost-effective care.
PURPOSE: To evaluate knowledge of interventional radiologists (IRs) and vascular surgeons (VSs) on the cost of common devices and procedures and to determine factors associated with differences in understanding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was administered to US faculty IRs and VSs. Demographic information and physicians' opinions on hospital costs were elicited. Respondents were asked to estimate the average price of 15 commonly used devices and to estimate the work relative value units (wRVUs) and average Medicare reimbursements for 10 procedures. Answer estimates were deemed correct if values were ± 25% of the actual costs. Multivariate logistical regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Of the 4,926 participants contacted, 1,090 (22.1%) completed the questionnaire. Overall, 19.8%, 22.8%, and 31.9% were accurate in price estimations of devices, Medicare reimbursement, and wRVUs for procedures. Physicians who thought themselves adequately educated about wRVUs were more accurate in predicting procedural costs in wRVUs than physicians who responded otherwise (odds ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.52; P < .0001). Estimation accuracies for procedures showed a positive trend in more experienced physicians (≥ 16 y), private practice physicians, and physicians who practice in rural areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that IRs and VSs have limited knowledge regarding device costs. Given the current health care environment, more attention should be placed on cost education and awareness so that physicians can provide the most cost-effective care.
Authors: Camille Broadwater-Hollifield; Lisa H Gren; Christina A Porucznik; Scott T Youngquist; David N Sundwall; Troy E Madsen Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Liza Abraham; Nik Goyert; Daniel J Kagedan; Andrea MacNeill; Michelle C Cleghorn; Julie Hallet; Fayez A Quereshy; Natalie G Coburn Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Kayvahn P Steck-Bayat; Janet A Foote; Jamal Mourad; Kelly H Roy; Andrea G Aguirre; Nichole D Mahnert Journal: JSLS Date: 2019 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Mursal Gardezi; Taylor D Ottesen; Vineet Tyagi; Josiah J Z Sherman; Jonathan N Grauer; Lee E Rubin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Andreas H Mahnken; Esther Boullosa Seoane; Allesandro Cannavale; Michiel W de Haan; Rok Dezman; Roman Kloeckner; Gerard O'Sullivan; Anthony Ryan; Georgia Tsoumakidou Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 2.740