PURPOSE: To establish that a magnetic device designed for intravascular use can bind small iron particles in physiologic flow models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Uncoated iron oxide particles 50-100 nm and 1-5 µm in size were tested in a water flow chamber over a period of 10 minutes without a magnet (ie, control) and with large and small prototype magnets. These same particles and 1-µm carboxylic acid-coated iron oxide beads were likewise tested in a serum flow chamber model without a magnet (ie, control) and with the small prototype magnet. RESULTS: Particles were successfully captured from solution. Particle concentrations in solution decreased in all experiments (P < .05 vs matched control runs). At 10 minutes, concentrations were 98% (50-100-nm particles in water with a large magnet), 97% (50-100-nm particles in water with a small magnet), 99% (1-5-µm particles in water with a large magnet), 99% (1-5-µm particles in water with a small magnet), 95% (50-100-nm particles in serum with a small magnet), 92% (1-5-µm particles in serum with a small magnet), and 75% (1-µm coated beads in serum with a small magnet) lower compared with matched control runs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the concept of magnetic capture of small iron oxide particles in physiologic flow models by using a small wire-mounted magnetic filter designed for intravascular use.
PURPOSE: To establish that a magnetic device designed for intravascular use can bind small iron particles in physiologic flow models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Uncoated iron oxide particles 50-100 nm and 1-5 µm in size were tested in a water flow chamber over a period of 10 minutes without a magnet (ie, control) and with large and small prototype magnets. These same particles and 1-µm carboxylic acid-coated iron oxide beads were likewise tested in a serum flow chamber model without a magnet (ie, control) and with the small prototype magnet. RESULTS: Particles were successfully captured from solution. Particle concentrations in solution decreased in all experiments (P < .05 vs matched control runs). At 10 minutes, concentrations were 98% (50-100-nm particles in water with a large magnet), 97% (50-100-nm particles in water with a small magnet), 99% (1-5-µm particles in water with a large magnet), 99% (1-5-µm particles in water with a small magnet), 95% (50-100-nm particles in serum with a small magnet), 92% (1-5-µm particles in serum with a small magnet), and 75% (1-µm coated beads in serum with a small magnet) lower compared with matched control runs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the concept of magnetic capture of small iron oxide particles in physiologic flow models by using a small wire-mounted magnetic filter designed for intravascular use.
Authors: Jason S Weinstein; Csanad G Varallyay; Edit Dosa; Seymur Gahramanov; Bronwyn Hamilton; William D Rooney; Leslie L Muldoon; Edward A Neuwelt Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Klaus Maier-Hauff; Ronny Rothe; Regina Scholz; Uwe Gneveckow; Peter Wust; Burghard Thiesen; Annelie Feussner; Andreas von Deimling; Norbert Waldoefner; Roland Felix; Andreas Jordan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2006-06-14 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Anand S Patel; Maythem Saeed; Erin J Yee; Jeffrey Yang; Gregory J Lam; Aaron D Losey; Prasheel V Lillaney; Bradford Thorne; Albert K Chin; Sheena Malik; Mark W Wilson; Xi C Chen; Nitash P Balsara; Steven W Hetts Journal: J Med Device Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 0.582
Authors: E Munnier; S Cohen-Jonathan; C Linassier; L Douziech-Eyrolles; H Marchais; M Soucé; K Hervé; P Dubois; I Chourpa Journal: Int J Pharm Date: 2008-07-16 Impact factor: 5.875
Authors: S A Curley; R A Newman; T B Dougherty; G M Fuhrman; D L Stone; J A Mikolajek; S Guercio; A Guercio; C H Carrasco; M T Kuo Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Johannes Lammer; Katarina Malagari; Thomas Vogl; Frank Pilleul; Alban Denys; Anthony Watkinson; Michael Pitton; Geraldine Sergent; Thomas Pfammatter; Sylvain Terraz; Yves Benhamou; Yves Avajon; Thomas Gruenberger; Maria Pomoni; Herbert Langenberger; Marcus Schuchmann; Jerome Dumortier; Christian Mueller; Patrick Chevallier; Riccardo Lencioni Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Mariam S Aboian; Jay F Yu; Ayushi Gautam; Chia-Hung Sze; Jeffrey K Yang; Jonathan Chan; Prasheel V Lillaney; Caroline D Jordan; Hee-Jeung Oh; David M Wilson; Anand S Patel; Mark W Wilson; Steven W Hetts Journal: Biomed Microdevices Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.838
Authors: Sravani Kondapavulur; Andre M Cote; Kiel D Neumann; Caroline D Jordan; David McCoy; Marc C Mabray; Derek Liu; Chia-Hung Sze; Ayushi Gautam; Henry F VanBrocklin; Mark Wilson; Steven W Hetts Journal: Biomed Microdevices Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.838
Authors: Caroline D Jordan; Misung Han; Sravani Kondapavulur; Denis Beckford Vera; Kiel D Neumann; Teri Moore; Carol Stillson; Roland Krug; Spencer Behr; Youngho Seo; Henry F VanBrocklin; Peder E Z Larson; Mark Wilson; Alastair J Martin; Steven W Hetts Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Niloufar Zarghami; Alexandre A Khrapitchev; Francisco Perez-Balderas; Manuel Sarmiento Soto; James R Larkin; Luca Bau; Nicola R Sibson Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2018-07-25