Todd Wilson1, Samuel Quan2, Kim Cheema2, Kelly Zarnke2, Rob Quinn3, Lawrence de Koning3, Elijah Dixon4, Neesh Pannu5, Matthew T James3. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 3. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 4. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication of major noncardiac surgery. Risk prediction models for AKI following noncardiac surgery may be useful for identifying high-risk patients to target with prevention strategies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of risk prediction models for AKI following major noncardiac surgery. MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews and Web of Science were searched for articles that (i) developed or validated a prediction model for AKI following major noncardiac surgery or (ii) assessed the impact of a model for predicting AKI following major noncardiac surgery that has been implemented in a clinical setting. RESULTS: We identified seven models from six articles that described a risk prediction model for AKI following major noncardiac surgeries. Three studies developed prediction models for AKI requiring renal replacement therapy following liver transplantation, three derived prediction models for AKI based on the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria following liver resection and one study developed a prediction model for AKI following major noncardiac surgical procedures. The final models included between 4 and 11 independent variables, and c-statistics ranged from 0.79 to 0.90. None of the models were externally validated. CONCLUSIONS: Risk prediction models for AKI after major noncardiac surgery are available; however, these models lack validation, studies of clinical implementation and impact analyses. Further research is needed to develop, validate and study the clinical impact of such models before broad clinical uptake.
BACKGROUND:Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication of major noncardiac surgery. Risk prediction models for AKI following noncardiac surgery may be useful for identifying high-risk patients to target with prevention strategies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of risk prediction models for AKI following major noncardiac surgery. MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews and Web of Science were searched for articles that (i) developed or validated a prediction model for AKI following major noncardiac surgery or (ii) assessed the impact of a model for predicting AKI following major noncardiac surgery that has been implemented in a clinical setting. RESULTS: We identified seven models from six articles that described a risk prediction model for AKI following major noncardiac surgeries. Three studies developed prediction models for AKI requiring renal replacement therapy following liver transplantation, three derived prediction models for AKI based on the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria following liver resection and one study developed a prediction model for AKI following major noncardiac surgical procedures. The final models included between 4 and 11 independent variables, and c-statistics ranged from 0.79 to 0.90. None of the models were externally validated. CONCLUSIONS: Risk prediction models for AKI after major noncardiac surgery are available; however, these models lack validation, studies of clinical implementation and impact analyses. Further research is needed to develop, validate and study the clinical impact of such models before broad clinical uptake.
Authors: Sehoon Park; Hyunjeong Cho; Seokwoo Park; Soojin Lee; Kwangsoo Kim; Hyung Jin Yoon; Jiwon Park; Yunhee Choi; Suehyun Lee; Ju Han Kim; Sejoong Kim; Ho Jun Chin; Dong Ki Kim; Kwon Wook Joo; Yon Su Kim; Hajeong Lee Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Muhammad Faisal; Andy Scally; Musab Ahmed Elgaali; Donald Richardson; Kevin Beatson; Mohammed A Mohammed Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.659
Authors: Kang Liu; Xiangzhou Zhang; Weiqi Chen; Alan S L Yu; John A Kellum; Michael E Matheny; Steven Q Simpson; Yong Hu; Mei Liu Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-07-01
Authors: Ross Harrison; Maria D Iniesta; Brandelyn Pitcher; Pedro T Ramirez; Katherine Cain; Ashley M Siverand; Gabriel Mena; Javier Lasala; Larissa A Meyer Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Gianluca Villa; Silvia De Rosa; Caterina Scirè Calabrisotto; Alessandro Nerini; Thomas Saitta; Dario Degl'Innocenti; Laura Paparella; Vittorio Bocciero; Marco Allinovi; Angelo R De Gaudio; Marlies Ostermann; Stefano Romagnoli Journal: Perioper Med (Lond) Date: 2021-05-25