Literature DB >> 26704413

Residual and Progressive Aortic Regurgitation After Valve-Sparing Root Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Multi-Institutional Analysis in 764 Patients.

Fabian A Kari1, Kai-Nicolas Doll2, Wolfgang Hemmer2, Markus Liebrich2, Hans-Hinrich Sievers3, Doreen Richardt3, Hermann Reichenspurner4, Christian Detter4, Matthias Siepe5, Martin Czerny5, Friedhelm Beyersdorf5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residual/progressive aortic regurgitation (rAR, pAR) after valve-sparing aortic root replacement (V-SARR) can lead to reoperations. We sought to characterize risk factors of mild rAR and pAR after V-SARR in a multicenter cohort. The effect of additional cusp repair on valve function was analyzed using propensity matching.
METHODS: A total of 1,015 patients after V-SARR were identified with (n = 288, 28%) or without additional cusp/commissure repair (n = 727, 72%) at four cardiac units in Germany. A total of 764 patients fulfilling transthoracic echocardiography follow-up-criteria comprised the study cohort. Logistic regression was used for risk factor analysis with endpoints rAR, new onset AR, and pAR. t tests and analyses of variance were used for between-group differences. The effects of additional cusp repair on valve function were studied comparing propensity-matched quintiles.
RESULTS: The incidence of rAR was 29%, with influencing factors aneurysm size (p = 0.07) and preoperative aortic valve function (p = 0.08). It was found more often among nonsyndromic patients (34% vs. 14%; OR, 0.4; p < 0.001). Progression of rAR was detectable in 30% after a mean of 4.3 years. The progression rate of rAR ∼ 0.3 grades per patient-year within the first 5 years. When quintiles identified by propensity score were compared, additional cusp repair was linked to new onset AR (p = 0.016) while it was not linked to rAR (p = 0.14) or pAR (p = 0.5).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidences of rAR and pAR are considerable after V-SARR. Patients should be operated on before large aneurysms are present. New onset AR after an initially good functional result is more likely after an additional cusp repair, while rAR and pAR are not influenced by cusp repair.
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26704413     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Aetiology and management of hereditary aortopathy.

Authors:  Aline Verstraeten; Ilse Luyckx; Bart Loeys
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Tirone on Tirone David operation and types.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-28

3.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version.

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Paul W M Fedak; Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas G Gleason; Evaldas Girdauskas; John S Ikonomidis; Ali Khoynezhad; Samuel C Siu; Subodh Verma; Michael D Hope; Duke E Cameron; Donald F Hammer; Joseph S Coselli; Marc R Moon; Thoralf M Sundt; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  David aortic valve-sparing reimplantation versus biological aortic root replacement: a retrospective analysis of 411 patients.

Authors:  Lukas Schamberger; Sergey Leontyev; Piroze Minoo Davierwala; Konstantin Von Aspern; Sven Lehmann; Martin Misfeld; Michael Andrew Borger
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-10-14

5.  Aortic valve repair techniques: an early UK experience.

Authors:  Renata Greco; Mirko Muretti; Xu Yu Jin; Mario Petrou
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-11-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.