| Literature DB >> 26704134 |
Maria G Onyango1,2, George N Michuki3, Moses Ogugo4, Gert J Venter5, Miguel A Miranda6, Nohal Elissa7, Appolinaire Djikeng8,9, Steve Kemp10, Peter J Walker11, Jean-Bernard Duchemin12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Culicoides imicola Kieffer, 1913 is the main vector of bluetongue virus (BTV) and African horse sickness virus (AHSV) in Sub-Saharan Africa. Understanding the population genetic structure of this midge and the nature of barriers to gene flow will lead to a deeper understanding of bluetongue epidemiology and more effective vector control in this region.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26704134 PMCID: PMC4690384 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-1277-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Map showing Culicoides imicola collection sites and serotype distribution in Africa . Map source: Arc Map
A table of the sites of midges collection with the locations and global positioning system coordinates of Culicoides imicola samples from Spain and Africa. The collection method used was the CDC light trap
| Species | Region | Site | Latitude | Longitude | n (Microsatellite) | n (Mitochondrial DNA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Kenya | Marigat | 0.47 | 35.99 | 26 | 21 |
|
| Balearic Islands | Mallorca | 39.61 | 2.95 | 24 | 14 |
|
| Madagascar | Ambalavao | −21.83 | 46.93 | 25 | 17 |
|
| Mauritius | Poste Lafayette | −20.14 | 57.75 | 35 | 13 |
|
| South Africa | Onderstepoort | −25.65 | 28.18 | 28 | 13 |
|
| Madagascar | Ambalavao | −21.83 | 46.93 | 5 | 5 |
Culicoides imicola microsatellite primer sequences developed and assessed in this study
| Locus name | Left primer | Right primer | NA | Size range | Motif type | Probe DB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1L88 | GTCGGTTGGTGTGTGTCATC | ACGACGACATTATTGACAGCAG | 16 | 180–286 | (GT)^10 | Pr032368558 |
| F2629 | ACTCTCAAGGTTTCCGCTG | GACGGCAAACAAAACATGCC | 20 | 130–242 | (GT)^9 | Pr032368559 |
| F2KK2 | ACGTGGTACTCAAAGGCAG | CCATGTGATACAGCTTGCGG | 21 | 166–228 | (GT)^9 | Pr032368560 |
| F3JMT | CCGATAGTTGTTGTCGTTCATTC | GTATGAGACTCGGTTTGCAC | 10 | 212–274 | (GT)^8 | Pr032368561 |
| F7ENT | CTGCCTTTTCCACCTCCAC | ATGCCAGAGTGAAAGCGAC | 12 | 94–198 | (AC)^9 | Pr032368562 |
| F9RDNb | AACAAAACACAGCCGCGAG | ATCAGCCAGTCCGCATAAG | 16 | 134–246 | (AC)^9 | Pr032368563 |
| FHNDU | ACGGGTCCGTGTATTTGTTG | GACGAGATACGGGCGAGAG | 14 | 172–198 | (AC)^8 | Pr032368564 |
| FIGO0a | CAGCAATAAATTGTGTGTCATAACC | GCTTCTCACTCTCCAAACATCTG | 15 | 184–226 | (GT)^8 | Pr032368565 |
| FJEAX | TCACGCCTGAACATGGGAG | AACAACAACAGAGGCAGGC | 11 | 185–210 | (GT)^8 | Pr032368566 |
| FRB3B | TCCAGCCATCGTCTTTCAG | GGGTGTGTGTAAACTCTATTGTAGC | 15 | 198–234 | (AG)^8 | Pr032368567 |
| FYCEH | CGCCACGCCATTTATCGTC | ACTGACAGCTTCCTCTCGC | 26 | 108–248 | (AC)^12 | Pr032368568 |
| G1OH4 | TCTCCCAGAAGCGTTTTGC | GTCGTCGTTCTGCCTTGC | 11 | 98–268 | (AC)^8 | Pr032368569 |
a discarded as it was in linkage disequilibrium with loci FHNDU (P < 0.05). bexcluded from downstream analysis because of too much missing data
A summary of mtDNA COI study collection sites and haplotype distribution
| Region | Haplotype | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 | H7 | H8 | H9 | H10 | H11 | H12 | H13 | H14 | H15 | H16 | H17 | H18 | H19 | H20 | H21 | H22 | H23 | H24 | H25 | H26 | H27 | Totals | |
| South Africa | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Madagascar | 10 | 4 | 1 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kenya | 12 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Israel | 5 | 1 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balearic Islands | 13 | 1 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greece | 2 | 3 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mauritius | 1 | 11 | 1 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 1 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 1 | 1 | 33 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 94 |
A table of estimates of Tajima’s D neutrality test of COI haplotypes C. bolitinos and C. imicola
| South Africa | Mauritius | Madagascar | Balearic Islands | Kenya | Israel | Greece | Mean | S.D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size | 13 | 13 | 17 | 14 | 21 | 6 | 5 | 11.75 | 5.9 |
| S | 10 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 8.6 | 12.7 |
| π | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.72 | 0.14 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 5.2 |
| Tajima’s D | −0.91 | −1.7 | −0.53 | −1.2 | −1.7 | −1.13 | 1.57 | −0.78 | 1.11 |
| P(Tajima’s D) | 0.19 |
| 0.32 | 0.16 |
| 0.14 | 0.97 | 0.26 | 0.33 |
| FS | −4.3 | −0.69 | −0.92 | −0.59 | −4.06 | 0.95 | 2.43 | −1.03 | 2.45 |
| P(FS) |
| 0.08 | 0.15 |
|
| 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.24 | 0.34 |
Bold indicate the significant values
Fig. 2Bayesian skyline plot based on partial sequences of the mitochondrial region. X axis represents time measured in mutation units per nucleotide position. The Y axis represents a correlate of population size Neμ). Black lines illustrate median Ne estimate, and blue area show the 95 % confidence interval
Fig. 3Haplotype networks of C. imicola COI sequences from the Mediterranean, Africa and C. bolitinos from Madagascar. Each circle represents a sequence; the size of the circle is proportional to number of individuals in possession of the particular haplotype sequence. The connections are mutational steps between individuals
A matrix of pairwise estimates of genetic distance (FST) (below diagonal) and geographic distances (Km) (above diagonal) of microsatellite DNA of C. imicola populations from Balearic Islands and Africa
| Kenya | Balearic Islands | Madagascar | Mauritius | South Africa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 5970 | 2550 | 3290 | 3010 | |
| Balearic Islands |
| 8490 | 9230 | 8030 | |
| Madagascar | 0.03(0.00 + −0.00) |
| 1120 | 2040 | |
| Mauritius | 0.03(0.00 + −0.00) |
| 0.02(0.00 + −0.00) | 3090 | |
| South Africa |
|
|
| 0.02 (0.00 + −0.00) |
Bold values are statistically significant (p<0.05)
Fig. 4Mantel test for correlation between the pairwise genetic distance and the geographic distance matrix. Regression analysis of pairwise genetic distance (FST/ 1- FST) regressed on pairwise geographic distance (Km) between collection sites revealed a significant positive correlation (r2 = 0.607, mantel probability = 0.0079 (P < 0.05)
Fig. 5Plots of cluster assignment of individuals into three founder populations. Each individual is represented by a single vertical line, partitioned into K-colored segments that represent the individual’s estimated membership fraction in each of the inferred cluster