Literature DB >> 26703917

Zofenopril or irbesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension untreated or uncontrolled by previous treatment: a double-blind, randomized study.

Pietro A Modesti1, Stefano Omboni, Stefano Taddei, Sergio Ghione, Francesco Portaluppi, Paolo Pozzilli, Massimo Volpe, Marcello Arca, Paolo Calabrò, Paolo L Dessì Fulgheri, Marco Bucci, Sergio Berra, Giovanni Q Villani, Mircea Vladoianu, Elena Popescu, Valerica G Velican, Octavian Pirvu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare zofenopril + hydrochlorothiazide (Z + H) vs. irbesartan + hydrochlorothiazide (I + H) efficacy on daytime SBP in elderly (>65 years) patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), untreated or uncontrolled by a previous monotherapy.
METHODS: After a 1-week run-in, 230 ISH patients (office SBP ≥ 140  mmHg and DBP < 90  mmHg + daytime SBP ≥ 135  mmHg and daytime DBP < 85  mmHg) were randomized double-blind to 18-week treatment with Z + H (30 + 12.5  mg) or I + H (150 + 12.5  mg) once daily, in an international, multicenter study. Z and I doses could be doubled after 6 and 12 weeks, and nitrendipine 20  mg added at 12 weeks in nonnormalized patients.
RESULTS: In the full analysis set (n = 216) baseline-adjusted average (95% confidence interval) daytime SBP reductions after 6 weeks (primary study end point) were similar (P = 0.888) with Z + H [7.7 (10.7, 4.6)  mmHg, n = 107] and I + H [7.9 (10.7, 5.0)  mmHg, n = 109]. Daytime SBP reductions were sustained during the study, and larger (P = 0.028) with low-dose Z + H at study end [16.2 (20.0, 12.5)  mmHg vs. 11.2 (14.4, 7.9)  mmHg I + H]. Daytime SBP normalization (<135 mmHg) rate was similar under Z + H and I + H at 6 and 12 weeks, but more common under Z + H at 18 weeks (68.2 vs. 56.0%, P = 0.031). Both drugs equally reduced SBP in the last 6 h of the dosing interval and homogeneously reduced SBP throughout the 24 h. The proportion of patients reporting drug-related adverse events was low (Z + H: 4.4% vs. I + H: 6.0%; P = 0.574).
CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with ISH respond well to both low and high-dose Z or I combined with H.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26703917     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  5 in total

1.  A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension.

Authors:  Chrisa Dimou; Christina Antza; Evangelos Akrivos; Ioannis Doundoulakis; Stella Stabouli; Anna Bettina Haidich; Vasilios Kotsis
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 2.  Efficacy of Zofenopril vs. Irbesartan in Combination with a Thiazide Diuretic in Hypertensive Patients with Multiple Risk Factors not Controlled by a Previous Monotherapy: A Review of the Double-Blind, Randomized "Z" Studies.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Ettore Malacco; Claudio Napoli; Pietro Amedeo Modesti; Athanasios Manolis; Gianfranco Parati; Enrico Agabiti-Rosei; Claudio Borghi
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Isolated Diastolic Hypertension and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies With 489,814 Participants.

Authors:  Mingyan Huang; Linzi Long; Ling Tan; Aling Shen; Mi Deng; Yuxuan Peng; Wenwen Yang; Hongzheng Li; Yue Wei; Meng Li; Feifei Liao; Chao Liu; Aimei Lu; Hua Qu; Changgeng Fu; Keji Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-05

4.  Zofenopril: Blood pressure control and cardio-protection.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Philippe Van De Borne; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.737

5.  Efficacy of zofenopril in combination with thiazide diuretics in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a pooled individual data analysis of four randomized, double-blind, controlled, prospective studies.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Stefano Omboni; Giorgio Reggiardo; Stefano Bacchelli; Daniela Degli Esposti; Ettore Ambrosioni
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.423

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.