Literature DB >> 26703418

A fully automated Drosophila olfactory classical conditioning and testing system for behavioral learning and memory assessment.

Hui Jiang1, Eriny Hanna2, Cheryl L Gatto3, Terry L Page3, Bharat Bhuva1, Kendal Broadie4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aversive olfactory classical conditioning has been the standard method to assess Drosophila learning and memory behavior for decades, yet training and testing are conducted manually under exceedingly labor-intensive conditions. To overcome this severe limitation, a fully automated, inexpensive system has been developed, which allows accurate and efficient Pavlovian associative learning/memory analyses for high-throughput pharmacological and genetic studies. NEW
METHOD: The automated system employs a linear actuator coupled to an odorant T-maze with airflow-mediated transfer of animals between training and testing stages. Odorant, airflow and electrical shock delivery are automatically administered and monitored during training trials. Control software allows operator-input variables to define parameters of Drosophila learning, short-term memory and long-term memory assays.
RESULTS: The approach allows accurate learning/memory determinations with operational fail-safes. Automated learning indices (immediately post-training) and memory indices (after 24h) are comparable to traditional manual experiments, while minimizing experimenter involvement. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS: The automated system provides vast improvements over labor-intensive manual approaches with no experimenter involvement required during either training or testing phases. It provides quality control tracking of airflow rates, odorant delivery and electrical shock treatments, and an expanded platform for high-throughput studies of combinational drug tests and genetic screens. The design uses inexpensive hardware and software for a total cost of ∼$500US, making it affordable to a wide range of investigators.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the design, construction and testing of a fully automated Drosophila olfactory classical association apparatus to provide low-labor, high-fidelity, quality-monitored, high-throughput and inexpensive learning and memory behavioral assays.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automation; Drosophila; Learning; Memory; Olfactory; Pavlovian classical conditioning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26703418      PMCID: PMC4749449          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  28 in total

Review 1.  Molecular biology and anatomy of Drosophila olfactory associative learning.

Authors:  G Roman; R L Davis
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  The staufen/pumilio pathway is involved in Drosophila long-term memory.

Authors:  Josh Dubnau; Ann-Shyn Chiang; Lori Grady; Jody Barditch; Scott Gossweiler; John McNeil; Patrick Smith; Francois Buldoc; Rod Scott; Uli Certa; Clemens Broger; Tim Tully
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Notch signaling in Drosophila long-term memory formation.

Authors:  Xuecai Ge; Frances Hannan; Zuolei Xie; Chunhua Feng; Tim Tully; Haimeng Zhou; Zuoping Xie; Yi Zhong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Experimental psychology: event timing turns punishment to reward.

Authors:  Hiromu Tanimoto; Martin Heisenberg; Bertram Gerber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Localization of long-term memory within the Drosophila mushroom body.

Authors:  A Pascual; T Préat
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Conditioning in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W A Hershberger; M P Smith
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1967 Apr-Jul       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Reward learning in normal and mutant Drosophila.

Authors:  B L Tempel; N Bonini; D R Dawson; W G Quinn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W G Quinn; W A Harris; S Benzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Dopamine and octopamine differentiate between aversive and appetitive olfactory memories in Drosophila.

Authors:  Martin Schwaerzel; Maria Monastirioti; Henrike Scholz; Florence Friggi-Grelin; Serge Birman; Martin Heisenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutant Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Tully; W G Quinn
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  5 in total

1.  Ethoscopes: An open platform for high-throughput ethomics.

Authors:  Quentin Geissmann; Luis Garcia Rodriguez; Esteban J Beckwith; Alice S French; Arian R Jamasb; Giorgio F Gilestro
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 2.  Logical fallacies in animal model research.

Authors:  Espen A Sjoberg
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 3.  Behavior Individuality: A Focus on Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rubén Mollá-Albaladejo; Juan A Sánchez-Alcañiz
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 4.  Dysregulation of BMP, Wnt, and Insulin Signaling in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Chunzhu Song; Kendal Broadie
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-06

5.  Active Inferants: An Active Inference Framework for Ant Colony Behavior.

Authors:  Daniel Ari Friedman; Alec Tschantz; Maxwell J D Ramstead; Karl Friston; Axel Constant
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.