Literature DB >> 6572401

Reward learning in normal and mutant Drosophila.

B L Tempel, N Bonini, D R Dawson, W G Quinn.   

Abstract

Hungry fruit flies can be trained by exposing them to two chemical odorants, one paired with the opportunity to feed on 1 M sucrose. On later testing, when given a choice between odorants the flies migrate specifically toward the sucrose-paired odor. This appetitively reinforced learning by the flies is similar in strength and character to previously demonstrated negatively reinforced learning, but it differs in several properties. Both memory consolidation and memory decay proceed relatively slowly after training with sucrose reward. Consolidation of learned information into anesthesia-resistant long-term memory requires about 100 min after training with sucrose compared to about 30 min after training with electric shock. Memory in wild-type flies persists for 24 hr after training with sucrose compared to 4-6 hr after training with electric shock. Memory in amnesiac mutants appears to be similarly lengthened, from 1 hr to 6 hr, by substituting sucrose reward for shock punishment. Two other mutants, dunce and rutabaga, which were isolated because they failed to learn the shock-avoidance task, learn normally in response to sucrose reward but forget rapidly afterward. One mutant, turnip, does not learn in either paradigm. Reward and punishment can be combined in olfactory discrimination training by pairing one odor to sucrose and the other to electric shock. In this situation, the expression of learning is approximately the sum of that obtained by using either reinforcement alone. After such training, memory decays at two distinct rates, each characteristic of one type of reinforcement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6572401      PMCID: PMC393622          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.80.5.1482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  The Drosophila memory mutant amnesiac.

Authors:  W G Quinn; P P Sziber; R Booker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Memory phases in Drosophila.

Authors:  W G Quinn; Y Dudai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  dunce, a mutant of Drosophila deficient in learning.

Authors:  Y Dudai; Y N Jan; D Byers; W G Quinn; S Benzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effect of castration on photoperiodically induced weight gain in the Djungarian hamster.

Authors:  K Hoffmann
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1978-09

5.  The case of the CT scanner.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.142

6.  Defect in cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase due to the dunce mutation of learning in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Byers; R L Davis; J A Kiger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Conditioning of leg position in normal and mutant Drosophila.

Authors:  R Booker; W G Quinn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W G Quinn; W A Harris; S Benzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Learning in normal and mutant Drosophila larvae.

Authors:  E O Aceves-Piña; W G Quinn
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Discrimination learning of an instrumental response in individual Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S A Platt; M Holliday; O W Drudge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1980-10
  10 in total
  137 in total

1.  Odor exposure causes central adaptation and morphological changes in selected olfactory glomeruli in Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Devaud; A Acebes; A Ferrús
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Identification of Drosophila mutant with memory defects after acquisition of conditioned reflex suppression of courtship.

Authors:  N G Kamyshev; K G Iliadi; Y V Bragina; E V Savvateeva-Popova; E V Tokmacheva; T Preat
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2000 May-Jun

Review 3.  Drosophila conditioned courtship: two ways of testing memory.

Authors:  N G Kamyshev; K G Iliadi; J V Bragina
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 4.  Pokes, sunburn, and hot sauce: Drosophila as an emerging model for the biology of nociception.

Authors:  Seol Hee Im; Michael J Galko
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.780

5.  Remembering nutrient quality of sugar in Drosophila.

Authors:  Christopher J Burke; Scott Waddell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Striatal mechanisms underlying movement, reinforcement, and punishment.

Authors:  Alexxai V Kravitz; Anatol C Kreitzer
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-06

7.  A new gene nested within the dunce genetic unit of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Furia; F A Digilio; D Artiaco; E Giordano; L C Polito
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Deconstructing memory in Drosophila.

Authors:  Carla Margulies; Tim Tully; Josh Dubnau
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Sequential use of mushroom body neuron subsets during drosophila odor memory processing.

Authors:  Michael J Krashes; Alex C Keene; Benjamin Leung; J Douglas Armstrong; Scott Waddell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Mutations in the dopa decarboxylase gene affect learning in Drosophila.

Authors:  B L Tempel; M S Livingstone; W G Quinn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.