Literature DB >> 26703166

Elastography by acoustic radiation force impulse technology for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a meta-analysis.

BaoXian Liu1, YanLing Zheng1, QuanYuan Shan1, Ying Lu1, ManXia Lin1, WenShuo Tian1, XiaoYan Xie2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis assessing the ability of elastography by acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions.
METHODS: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Knowledge before September 24, 2014 were searched. Published studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of ARFI for characterization of focal breast lesions were included.
RESULTS: A total of fifteen studies, including 1720 patients with 1873 breast lesions (743 cancers, 1130 benign lesions), was analyzed. Among the included studies, virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI) was used in six studies, virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) in eight, combined VTI and VTQ in four, and virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) in three. Summary sensitivity and summary specificity for distinguishing malignant from benign breast lesions were 0.913 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.779-0.969] and 0.871 (95% CI 0.773-0.930) for VTI, 0.849 (95% CI 0.805-0.884) and 0.889 (95% CI 0.771-0.950) for VTQ, and 0.935 (95% CI 0.892-0.961) and 0.881 (95% CI 0.818-0.924) for combined VTI and VTQ, respectively. The area under summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve of VTI, VTQ, and combined VTI and VTQ were 0.95, 0.88, and 0.96, respectively. Significant publication bias was found only in the VTQ assessment (p = 0.025). The obtained sensitivity of VTIQ ranged from 80.4 to 90.3%, while the specificity ranged from 73.0 to 93.0%. The summary diagnostic value of VTIQ could not be evaluated due to insufficient data.
CONCLUSION: Elastography by ARFI technology could be used as a good identification tool for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic radiation force impulse; Breast cancer; Meta-analysis; Virtual touch tissue imaging; Virtual touch tissue quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26703166     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-015-0658-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  29 in total

1.  Ultrasonographic elastography of the breast using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: preliminary study.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Sachiko Isobe; Miki Yamaguchi; Yukari Ogawa; Kanako Homma; Masahiro Saito; Chanwoong Joo; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Ultrasonographic tissue quantification of the breast using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: phantom study and clinical application.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Masahiro Saito; Chanwoong Joo; Miki Yamaguchi; Sachiko Isobe; Yukari Ogawa; Kanako Homma; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group.

Authors:  J A Berlin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-07-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: basics and terminology.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Shiina
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.

Authors:  J Heinig; R Witteler; R Schmitz; L Kiesel; J Steinhard
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Shear wave velocity measurements for differential diagnosis of solid breast masses: a comparison between virtual touch quantification and virtual touch IQ.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Masahiro Saito; John Benson; Liexiang Fan; Sachiko Isobe
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Penny F Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Marie E Westwood; Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Johannes B Reitsma; Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan A C Sterne; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with Virtual Touch™ tissue quantification: mean shear wave velocity of malignant and benign breast masses.

Authors:  Sebastian Wojcinski; Kathrin Brandhorst; Gelareh Sadigh; Peter Hillemanns; Friedrich Degenhardt
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-09-30

9.  Diagnostic value of elastography using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and strain ratio for breast tumors.

Authors:  Yoon Seok Kim; Jung Gu Park; Beom Su Kim; Chung Han Lee; Dong Won Ryu
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue quantification for breast lesions with different size.

Authors:  Minghua Yao; Jian Wu; Liling Zou; Guang Xu; Juan Xie; Rong Wu; Huixiong Xu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The validity and reliability of using ultrasound elastography to measure cutaneous stiffness, a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen M DeJong; Steven Abbott; Marilyn Zelesco; Brendan F Kennedy; Mel R Ziman; Fiona M Wood
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-12-20

2.  Ultrasonography methods for predicting malignancy in canine mammary tumors.

Authors:  Marcus Antonio Rossi Feliciano; Ricardo Andrés Ramirez Uscategui; Marjury Cristina Maronezi; Ana Paula Rodrigues Simões; Priscila Silva; Beatriz Gasser; Leticia Pavan; Cibele Figueira Carvalho; Júlio Carlos Canola; Wilter Ricardo Russiano Vicente
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Breast Involvement by Hematologic Malignancies: Ultrasound and Elastography Findings with Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Hulya Aslan; Aysin Pourbagher
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2017-11-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.