Literature DB >> 26702926

Antiretroviral resistance at virological failure in the NEAT 001/ANRS 143 trial: raltegravir plus darunavir/ritonavir or tenofovir/emtricitabine plus darunavir/ritonavir as first-line ART.

S Lambert-Niclot1, E C George2, A Pozniak3, E White2, C Schwimmer4, H Jessen5, M Johnson6, D Dunn2, C F Perno7, B Clotet8, A Plettenberg9, A Blaxhult10, L Palmisano11, L Wittkop12, V Calvez13, A G Marcelin13, F Raffi14.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the pattern of drug resistance at virological failure in the NEAT001/ANRS143 trial (first-line treatment with ritonavir-boosted darunavir plus either tenofovir/emtricitabine or raltegravir).
METHODS: Genotypic testing was performed at baseline for reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease genes and for RT, protease and integrase (IN) genes for patients with a confirmed viral load (VL) >50 copies/mL or any single VL >500 copies/mL during or after week 32.
RESULTS: A resistance test was obtained for 110/805 (13.7%) randomized participants qualifying for resistance analysis (61/401 of participants in the raltegravir arm and 49/404 of participants in the tenofovir/emtricitabine arm). No resistance-associated mutation (RAM) was observed in the tenofovir/emtricitabine plus darunavir/ritonavir arm, and all further analyses were limited to the raltegravir plus darunavir arm. In this group, 15/55 (27.3%) participants had viruses with IN RAMs (12 N155H alone, 1 N155H + Q148R, 1 F121Y and 1 Y143C), 2/53 (3.8%) with nucleotide analogue RT inhibitor RAMs (K65R, M41L) and 1/57 (1.8%) with primary protease RAM (L76V). The frequency of IN mutations at failure was significantly associated with baseline VL: 7.1% for a VL of <100,000 copies/mL, 25.0% for a VL of ≥100,000 copies/mL and <500,000 copies/mL and 53.8% for a VL of ≥500,000 copies/mL (PTREND = 0.007). Of note, 4/15 participants with IN RAM had a VL < 200 copies/mL at time of testing.
CONCLUSIONS: In the NEAT001/ANRS143 trial, there was no RAM at virological failure in the standard tenofovir/emtricitabine plus darunavir/ritonavir regimen, contrasting with a rate of 29.5% (mostly IN mutations) in the raltegravir plus darunavir/ritonavir NRTI-sparing regimen. The cumulative risk of IN RAM after 96 weeks of follow-up in participants initiating ART with raltegravir plus darunavir/ritonavir was 3.9%.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26702926     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkv427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  8 in total

Review 1.  New Strategies of ARV: the Road to Simplification.

Authors:  Rosa de Miguel Buckley; Rocio Montejano; Natalia Stella-Ascariz; Jose R Arribas
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.071

2.  Influence of UGT1A1 and SLC22A6 polymorphisms on the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of raltegravir in HIV-infected adults: a NEAT001/ANRS143 sub-study.

Authors:  Rohan Gurjar; Laura Dickinson; Daniel Carr; Wolfgang Stöhr; Stefano Bonora; Andrew Owen; Antonio D'Avolio; Adam Cursley; Nathalie De Castro; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Linos Vandekerckhove; Giovanni Di Perri; Anton Pozniak; Christine Schwimmer; François Raffi; Marta Boffito
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.245

3.  Antiretroviral Drugs for Treatment and Prevention of HIV Infection in Adults: 2018 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel.

Authors:  Michael S Saag; Constance A Benson; Rajesh T Gandhi; Jennifer F Hoy; Raphael J Landovitz; Michael J Mugavero; Paul E Sax; Davey M Smith; Melanie A Thompson; Susan P Buchbinder; Carlos Del Rio; Joseph J Eron; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Huldrych F Günthard; Jean-Michel Molina; Donna M Jacobsen; Paul A Volberding
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Meeting the WHO 90% target: antiretroviral treatment efficacy in Poland is associated with baseline clinical patient characteristics.

Authors:  Milosz Parczewski; Ewa Siwak; Magdalena Leszczyszyn-Pynka; Iwona Cielniak; Ewa Burkacka; Piotr Pulik; Adam Witor; Karolina Muller; Ewelina Zasik; Anna Grzeszczuk; Maria Jankowska; Małgorzata Lemańska; Anita Olczak; Edyta Grąbczewska; Aleksandra Szymczak; Jacek Gąsiorowski; Bartosz Szetela; Monika Bociąga-Jasik; Paweł Skwara; Magdalena Witak-Jędra; Elżbieta Jabłonowska; Kamila Wójcik-Cichy; Juliusz Kamerys; Małgorzata Janczarek; Dagny Krankowska; Tomasz Mikuła; Katarzyna Kozieł; Dariusz Bielec; Justyna Stempkowska; Aleksandra Kocbach; Wiesława Błudzin; Andrzej Horban
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.396

5.  Positive Virological Outcomes of HIV-Infected Patients on Protease Inhibitor-Based Second-Line Regimen in Cambodia: The ANRS 12276 2PICAM Study.

Authors:  Olivier Ségéral; Eric Nerrienet; Sansothy Neth; Bruno Spire; Vohith Khol; Laurent Ferradini; Saramony Sarun; Chandara Mom; Sopheak Ngin; Charlotte Charpentier; Pagnaroat Men; Marion Mora; Vun Mean Chhi; Penhsun Ly; Vonthanak Saphonn
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-03-19

Review 6.  Two-drug regimens for treatment of naïve HIV-1 infection and as maintenance therapy.

Authors:  Katya C Corado; Margaret R Caplan; Eric S Daar
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 7.  Two-Drug Regimens for HIV-Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Alexandre Pérez-González; Inés Suárez-García; Antonio Ocampo; Eva Poveda
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 8.  Two's a Company, Three's a Crowd: A Review of Initiating or Switching to a Two-Drug Antiretroviral Regimen in Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Patients Living with HIV-1.

Authors:  Melissa Badowski; Sarah E Pérez; David Silva; Andrea Lee
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2020-03-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.