Literature DB >> 26702836

Natural Head Posture in the Setting of Sagittal Spinal Deformity: Validation of Chin-Brow Vertical Angle, Slope of Line of Sight, and McGregor's Slope With Health-Related Quality of Life.

Renaud Lafage1, Vincent Challier, Barthelemy Liabaud, Shaleen Vira, Emmanuelle Ferrero, Bassel G Diebo, Shian Liu, Jean-Marc Vital, Keyvan Mazda, Themistocles S Protopsaltis, Thomas J Errico, Frank J Schwab, Virginie Lafage.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The maintenance of horizontal gaze is an essential function of upright posture and global sagittal spinal alignment. Horizontal gaze is classically measured by the chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), which is not readily measured on most lateral spine radiographs.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate relations between CBVA and the slope of the line of sight, the slope of McGregor's line (McGS), and Oswestry Disability Index.
METHODS: Patients were identified from a single center database of 531 spine patients who underwent full-body EOS x-rays. Correlations between CBVA, the slope of the line of sight, and McGS were assessed. Using a quadratic regression with Oswestry Disability Index and CBVA, windows of low disability were identified. Comparison of sagittal spinopelvic parameters was carried out between patients with "ascending gaze" and "neutral position."
RESULTS: Three hundred three patients were included (74% female, mean age 54.8 years, body mass index 26.6 ± 6.0 kg/m). CBVA strongly correlated with the slope of the line of sight (r = 0.996) and McGS (r = 0.862). Regression studies between Oswestry Disability Index and CBVA yielded a range of values corresponding to low disability (-4.7 degrees to 17.7 degrees). Similarly, a low disability range for the slope of the line of sight (-5.1 degrees to 18.5 degrees) and McGS (-5.7 degrees to 14.3 degrees) was computed. Patients with "ascending gaze" had a worse spinopelvic alignment than "neutral position" patients.
CONCLUSION: The slope of the line of sight and McGS correlated strongly with CBVA and can be used as surrogate measures. The range of values for these measures corresponding to low disability was identified. These values can be used as a general guideline to assess alignment for diagnostic purposes. Cervical compensatory mechanism may modify the natural head position in sagittally misaligned patients. ABBREVIATIONS: CBVA, chin-brow vertical angleHRQoL, health-related quality of lifeMcGS, slope of McGregor's lineODI, Oswestry Disability IndexSLs, slope of the line of sight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26702836     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  21 in total

Review 1.  Adult cervical deformity: radiographic and osteotomy classifications.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Neil V Shah; Maximillian Solow; Vincent Challier; Carl B Paulino; Peter G Passias; Renaud Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Cervical and postural strategies for maintaining horizontal gaze in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Nour Khalil; Aren Joe Bizdikian; Ziad Bakouny; Michel Salameh; Naji Bou Zeid; Fares Yared; Joeffroy Otayek; Khalil Kharrat; Gaby Kreichati; Ismat Ghanem; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Ibrahim Obeid; Ayman Assi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Sagittal balance and idiopathic scoliosis: does final sagittal alignment influence outcomes, degeneration rate or failure rate?

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Yong Hai; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Etiology and treatment of cervical kyphosis: state of the art review-a narrative review.

Authors:  Yoji Ogura; John R Dimar; Mladen Djurasovic; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09

6.  Cervical deformity patients with baseline hyperlordosis or hyperkyphosis differ in surgical treatment and radiographic outcomes.

Authors:  Peter Gust Passias; Haddy Alas; Nicholas Kummer; Peter Tretiakov; Bassel G Diebo; Renaud Lafage; Christopher P Ames; Breton Line; Eric O Klineberg; Douglas C Burton; Juan S Uribe; Han Jo Kim; Alan H Daniels; Shay Bess; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Gregory M Mundis; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank J Schwab; Justin S Smith; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

7.  The impact of age, sex, disc height loss and T1 slope on the upper and lower cervical lordosis: a large-scale radiologic study.

Authors:  Youping Tao; Fabio Galbusera; Frank Niemeyer; René Jonas; Dino Samartzis; Daniel Vogele; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Effects of mirror placement on sagittal alignment of the spine during acquisition of full-spine standing X-Rays.

Authors:  Shin Oe; Daisuke Togawa; Go Yoshida; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Yu Yamato; Tatsuya Yasuda; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Yuki Mihara; Hiroki Ushirozako; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Limited morbidity and possible radiographic benefit of C2 vs. subaxial cervical upper-most instrumented vertebrae.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Cole A Bortz; Frank Segreto; Samantha Horn; Katherine E Pierce; Haddy Alas; Avery E Brown; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Justin S Smith; Breton Line; Robert Eastlack; Daniel M Sciubba; Eric O Klineberg; Alexandra Soroceanu; Douglas C Burton; Frank J Schwab; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

10.  The Influence of Natural Head Position on the Cervical Sagittal Alignment.

Authors:  Kuan Wang; Zhen Deng; Zhengyan Li; Huihao Wang; Hongsheng Zhan
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-08-13       Impact factor: 2.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.