Daniel T Tarara1, Lucas K Fogaca2, Jeffrey B Taylor3, Eric J Hegedus3. 1. Department of Exercise Science, High Point University, School of Health Sciences, High Point, North Carolina, USA. 2. Department of Biology, High Point University, High Point, North Carolina, USA. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, High Point University, School of Health Sciences, High Point, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In parts 1 and 2 of this systematic review, the methodological quality as well as the quality of the measurement properties of physical performance tests (PPTs) of the lower extremity in athletes was assessed. In this study, part 3, PPTs of the upper extremity in athletes are examined. METHODS: Database and hand searches were conducted to identify primary literature addressing the use of upper extremity PPTs in athletes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed and the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to critique the methodological quality of each paper. The Terwee Scale was used to analyse the quality of the measurement properties of each test. RESULTS: 11 articles that examined 6 PPTs were identified. The 6 PPTs were: closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUEST), seated shot put (2 hands), unilateral seated shot put, medicine ball throw, modified push-up test and 1-arm hop test. Best evidence synthesis provided moderate positive evidence for the CKCUEST and unilateral seated shot put. Limited positive evidence was available for the medicine ball throw and 1-arm hop test. CONCLUSIONS: There are a limited number of upper extremity PPTs used as part of musculoskeletal screening examinations, or as outcome measures in athletic populations. The CKCUEST and unilateral seated shot put are 2 promising PPTs based on moderate evidence. However, the utility of the PPTs in injured populations is unsubstantiated in literature and warrants further investigation. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
OBJECTIVE: In parts 1 and 2 of this systematic review, the methodological quality as well as the quality of the measurement properties of physical performance tests (PPTs) of the lower extremity in athletes was assessed. In this study, part 3, PPTs of the upper extremity in athletes are examined. METHODS: Database and hand searches were conducted to identify primary literature addressing the use of upper extremity PPTs in athletes. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed and the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to critique the methodological quality of each paper. The Terwee Scale was used to analyse the quality of the measurement properties of each test. RESULTS: 11 articles that examined 6 PPTs were identified. The 6 PPTs were: closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUEST), seated shot put (2 hands), unilateral seated shot put, medicine ball throw, modified push-up test and 1-arm hop test. Best evidence synthesis provided moderate positive evidence for the CKCUEST and unilateral seated shot put. Limited positive evidence was available for the medicine ball throw and 1-arm hop test. CONCLUSIONS: There are a limited number of upper extremity PPTs used as part of musculoskeletal screening examinations, or as outcome measures in athletic populations. The CKCUEST and unilateral seated shot put are 2 promising PPTs based on moderate evidence. However, the utility of the PPTs in injured populations is unsubstantiated in literature and warrants further investigation. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: Philippe Decleve; Joachim Van Cant; Ellen De Buck; Justine Van Doren; Julie Verkouille; Ann M Cools Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Christina A Hermanns; Reed G Coda; Sana Cheema; Matthew L Vopat; Armin Tarakemeh; Kyle Veazey; John P Schroeppel; Scott Mullen; Bryan G Vopat Journal: Kans J Med Date: 2021-10-14
Authors: Stephanie Greenspan; David Munro; Joanna Nicholas; Janine Stubbe; Melanie I Stuckey; Rogier M Van Rijn Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2022-09-13
Authors: Brandon T Goldenberg; Pamela Goldsten; Lucca Lacheta; Justin W Arner; Matthew T Provencher; Peter J Millett Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2021-06-01