| Literature DB >> 26700466 |
Michael Kulbak1, Satyajit Gupta1, Nir Kedem1, Igal Levine1, Tatyana Bendikov1, Gary Hodes1, David Cahen1.
Abstract
Direct comparison between perovskite-structured hybrid organic-inorganic methylammonium lead bromide (MAPbBr3) and all-inorganic cesium lead bromide (CsPbBr3), allows identifying possible fundamental differences in their structural, thermal and electronic characteristics. Both materials possess a similar direct optical band gap, but CsPbBr3 demonstrates a higher thermal stability than MAPbBr3. In order to compare device properties, we fabricated solar cells, with similarly synthesized MAPbBr3 or CsPbBr3, over mesoporous titania scaffolds. Both cell types demonstrated comparable photovoltaic performances under AM1.5 illumination, reaching power conversion efficiencies of ∼6% with a poly aryl amine-based derivative as hole transport material. Further analysis shows that Cs-based devices are as efficient as, and more stable than methylammonium-based ones, after aging (storing the cells for 2 weeks in a dry (relative humidity 15-20%) air atmosphere in the dark) for 2 weeks, under constant illumination (at maximum power), and under electron beam irradiation.Entities:
Keywords: CsPbBr3; perovskite solar cells; stability
Year: 2015 PMID: 26700466 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Chem Lett ISSN: 1948-7185 Impact factor: 6.475