| Literature DB >> 27457130 |
Fedwa El-Mellouhi1, El Tayeb Bentria1, Sergey N Rashkeev1, Sabre Kais1,2,3, Fahhad H Alharbi1,2.
Abstract
In the past few years, the meteoric development of hybrid organic-inorganicEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27457130 PMCID: PMC4960530 DOI: 10.1038/srep30305
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Crystal structures of the tetragonal phases of (a) CH3NH3PbX3, (b) CH3PH3PbX3, (c) CH3SH2PbX3, and (d) SH3PbX3 where X = I or Br. (e) The partial charges of the used cations3637.
Figure 2The calculated band gaps of the tetragonal phases of the considered materials in this work.
Figure 3The calculated reaction and hull energies of the phase separation reactions of the considered materials to the most stable compounds.
Figure 4The calculated bond length elongation between the bridging H and its atom (N, P, or S) in the cation in the crystal compared to its length as a standalone cation.
The Normalized participation ratios for the bridging states between the cations and the octahedra.
| N, P, or S | H | I or Br | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CH3NH3PbI3 | 0.018 | 0.009 | 0.973 |
| CH3NH3PbBr3 | 0.049 | 0.005 | 0.946 |
| CH3PH3PbI3 | 0.068 | 0.034 | 0.898 |
| CH3PH3PbBr3 | 0.694 | 0.056 | 0.250 |
| CH3SH2PbI3 | 0.073 | 0.018 | 0.909 |
| CH3SH2PbBr3 | 0.076 | 0.017 | 0.907 |
| SH3PbI3 | 0.124 | 0.013 | 0.863 |
| SH3PbBr3 | 0.202 | 0.011 | 0.787 |
Figure 5The projected density of states (PDOS) of all the studied materials (red for s orbitals, green for p orbitals, and blue for d orbitals).
The arrows indicate the bridging states for which we calculate normalized PR values.
Figure 6The contour maps of the electronic densities of the bridging states at planes with maximum interaction.