Stacey A Fedewa1, Janet S de Moor2, Elizabeth M Ward3, Carol E DeSantis3, Ann Goding Sauer3, Robert A Smith4, Ahmedin Jemal3. 1. Intramural Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: stacey.fedewa@cancer.org. 2. Healthcare Assessment Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 3. Intramural Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Cancer Control Sciences, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) no longer recommended routine mammography for women aged 40-49 and ≥75 years (younger and older women, respectively). Whether mammography usage and physician recommendation among younger and older women changed in response to these recommendations is unclear. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from women aged ≥40 years in the 2008 and 2013 National Health Interview Surveys were used (n=4,942 younger and 3,047 older women) and were analyzed in 2015. Changes between 2008 and 2013 in self-reports about having undergone mammography in the past 2 years and physician recommendation for mammography were expressed as adjusted prevalence difference (PD) and 95% CI. RESULTS: Overall, adjusted prevalence of mammography among younger women was similar in 2008 (62.2%) and 2013 (58.5%) (p=0.05), but significantly declined in high-income (PD=-6.1%, 95% CI=-11.2, -1.0); non-Hispanic white (PD=-5.5%, 95% CI=-10.2, -0.8); and privately insured (PD=-5.7%, 95% CI=-9.8, -1.6) younger women. For older women, there was no change in adjusted mammography prevalence overall (2008, 56.2%; 2013, 54.2%; p=0.473) or by SES. Physician mammography recommendation declined in younger (PD=-5.0%, 95% CI=-8.7, -1.3) and older (PD=-5.8%, 95% CI=-10.5, -1.1) women. CONCLUSIONS: Four years after publication of USPSTF mammography recommendations, mammography prevalence for younger and older women did not significantly decrease except for higher-SES younger women. The significant decrease in physician recommendation of mammography in younger and older women may reflect a change in practice patterns by some physicians in response to USPSTF recommendations.
INTRODUCTION: In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) no longer recommended routine mammography for women aged 40-49 and ≥75 years (younger and older women, respectively). Whether mammography usage and physician recommendation among younger and older women changed in response to these recommendations is unclear. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from women aged ≥40 years in the 2008 and 2013 National Health Interview Surveys were used (n=4,942 younger and 3,047 older women) and were analyzed in 2015. Changes between 2008 and 2013 in self-reports about having undergone mammography in the past 2 years and physician recommendation for mammography were expressed as adjusted prevalence difference (PD) and 95% CI. RESULTS: Overall, adjusted prevalence of mammography among younger women was similar in 2008 (62.2%) and 2013 (58.5%) (p=0.05), but significantly declined in high-income (PD=-6.1%, 95% CI=-11.2, -1.0); non-Hispanic white (PD=-5.5%, 95% CI=-10.2, -0.8); and privately insured (PD=-5.7%, 95% CI=-9.8, -1.6) younger women. For older women, there was no change in adjusted mammography prevalence overall (2008, 56.2%; 2013, 54.2%; p=0.473) or by SES. Physician mammography recommendation declined in younger (PD=-5.0%, 95% CI=-8.7, -1.3) and older (PD=-5.8%, 95% CI=-10.5, -1.1) women. CONCLUSIONS: Four years after publication of USPSTF mammography recommendations, mammography prevalence for younger and older women did not significantly decrease except for higher-SES younger women. The significant decrease in physician recommendation of mammography in younger and older women may reflect a change in practice patterns by some physicians in response to USPSTF recommendations.
Authors: David F Warner; Siran M Koroukian; Nicholas K Schiltz; Kathleen A Smyth; Gregory S Cooper; Cynthia Owusu; Kurt C Stange; Nathan A Berger Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2019-05-17
Authors: Deeonna E Farr; Heather M Brandt; Swann Arp Adams; Venice E Haynes; Andrea S Gibson; Dawnyéa D Jackson; Kimberly C Rawlinson; John R Ureda; James R Hébert Journal: J Community Health Date: 2020-02
Authors: S Jane Henley; Cheryll C Thomas; Denise Riedel Lewis; Elizabeth M Ward; Farhad Islami; Manxia Wu; Hannah K Weir; Susan Scott; Recinda L Sherman; Jiemin Ma; Betsy A Kohler; Kathleen Cronin; Ahmedin Jemal; Vicki B Benard; Lisa C Richardson Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 6.921