Literature DB >> 26699204

An experimental examination of interindividual variation in feather corticosterone content in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus in southeast Australia.

Yaara Aharon-Rotman1, Katherine L Buchanan2, Marcel Klaassen2, William A Buttemer2.   

Abstract

Non-invasive techniques for measuring glucocorticoids (GCs) have become more prevalent, due to the advantage of eliminating the effects of animal disturbance on GC levels and their potential to provide an integrated, historic estimate of circulating GC levels. In the case of birds, corticosterone (CORT) is deposited in feathers, and may reflect a bird's GC status over the period of feather synthesis. This technique thus permits a retrospective view of the average circulating GC levels during the moult period. While it is generally assumed that differences in feather CORT content (CORTf) between individuals reflects their different stress histories during either natural or induced moult, it is not clear how much of this variation is due to extrinsic versus intrinsic factors. We examined this question by determining CORTf in free-living house sparrows (Passer domesticus) from two populations, one urban and the other rural, that were plucked before and after exposure to different plasma CORT levels while held captive. We experimentally manipulated plasma CORT by implanting birds with either a corticosterone-filled, metyrapone-filled, or empty ('sham') silastic capsule as replacement feathers first emerged. The pattern of post-treatment CORTf was consistent with our expectations, based on plasma CORT levels of an experimentally implanted reference group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in CORTf between these treatment groups unless sex, population origin, and CORTf of original feathers for each individual were included in a model. Thus, birds with higher CORTf in feathers removed for this experiment tended to have higher CORTf in post-treatment replacement feathers, irrespective of treatment. In addition, we found that feather fault bar scores were significantly higher in CORT-treated birds than in the other two treatment groups, but did not vary directly with CORTf level. Our study therefore broadly confirms the use of feathers as a non-invasive tool to estimate plasma CORT during moult in birds, but importantly demonstrates the potential for intrinsic differences in stress characteristics between populations and individuals to obscure the effects extrinsic stressors might have on CORTf.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avian; Behaviour; Endocrine; Stress response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26699204     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol        ISSN: 0016-6480            Impact factor:   2.822


  4 in total

1.  Why fly the extra mile? Using stress biomarkers to assess wintering habitat quality in migratory shorebirds.

Authors:  Yaara Aharon-Rotman; Katherine L Buchanan; Nicholas J Clark; Marcel Klaassen; William A Buttemer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Corticosterone in feathers: Inter- and intraindividual variation in pullets and the importance of the feather type.

Authors:  Katharina Elisabeth Häffelin; Falko Kaufmann; Rebecca Lindenwald; Stefanie Döhring; Birgit Spindler; Rudolf Preisinger; Silke Rautenschlein; Nicole Kemper; Robby Andersson
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2020-12-04

3.  Do wild-caught urban house sparrows show desensitized stress responses to a novel stressor?

Authors:  Noraine Salleh Hudin; Aimeric Teyssier; Johan Aerts; Graham D Fairhurst; Diederik Strubbe; Joël White; Liesbeth De Neve; Luc Lens
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.422

4.  Corticosterone in feathers of laying hens: an assay validation for evidence-based assessment of animal welfare.

Authors:  K E Häffelin; R Lindenwald; F Kaufmann; S Döhring; B Spindler; R Preisinger; S Rautenschlein; N Kemper; R Andersson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.