| Literature DB >> 29632231 |
Noraine Salleh Hudin1,2, Aimeric Teyssier1, Johan Aerts3,4, Graham D Fairhurst5, Diederik Strubbe1, Joël White6, Liesbeth De Neve7, Luc Lens1.
Abstract
While urbanization exposes individuals to novel challenges, urban areas may also constitute stable environments in which seasonal fluctuations are buffered. Baseline and stress-induced plasma corticosterone (cort) levels are often found to be similar in urban and rural populations. Here we aimed to disentangle two possible mechanisms underlying such pattern: (i) urban environments are no more stressful or urban birds have a better ability to habituate to stressors; or (ii) urban birds developed desensitized stress responses. We exposed wild-caught urban and rural house sparrows (Passer domesticus) to combined captivity and diet treatments (urban versus rural diet) and measured corticosterone levels both in natural tail feathers and in regrown homologous ones (cortf). Urban and rural house sparrows showed similar cortf levels in the wild and in response to novel stressors caused by the experiment, supporting the growing notion that urban environments are no more stressful during the non-breeding season than are rural ones. Still, juveniles and males originating from urban populations showed the highest cortf levels in regrown feathers. We did not find evidence that cortf was consistent within individuals across moults. Our study stresses the need for incorporating both intrinsic and environmental factors for the interpretation of variation in cortf between populations.Entities:
Keywords: Aviary; Feather corticosterone; Moult; Passerines; Urban exploiter
Year: 2018 PMID: 29632231 PMCID: PMC6031342 DOI: 10.1242/bio.031849
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Open ISSN: 2046-6390 Impact factor: 2.422
Predicted responses in three measures of stress under the hypotheses of ‘unaltered’ or ‘desensitized’ stress physiology in urban house sparrows, as compared to rural ones
Results from the LMM testing cort
Fig. 1.cort (corrected for feather length) in relation to FA in males and females. Full model results can be found in .
Fig. 2.Average cumulative moult scores (±s.e.m.) in juveniles and adults from urban and rural populations. Moult score ranges from 6–18, and higher scores indicate advanced moult (see the Materials and Methods). Sample sizes in each group are also shown.
Results from LMM explaining variation in cort
Fig. 3.Variation in cort of regrown feathers (cort Full model results can be found in Table 2. Sample sizes in each group are shown.
Fig. 4.Average regrown feather quality (±s.e.m.) in males and females from rural and urban sites in relation diet treatment. Sample sizes are also shown.
Fig. 5.Average (±95% C.I.) GBW of regrown feathers according to moult state of the removed feather. Values are corrected for variation explained by feather length and growth time (see text). Moult states are presented in order of increasing costs that already had been invested in moult: M1, Old feather is dropped, but moulting feather is too small to be plucked; O, Old feather; M2, Moulting feather, <50% grown and large enough to be plucked; N1, New feather, >50% but not full grown; N2, New feather full grown.