| Literature DB >> 26697152 |
Leila Erfanparast1, Ali Vafaei2, Azin Sohrabi2, Bahram Ranjkesh2, Zahra Bahadori3, Maryam Pourkazemi2, Shabnam Dadashi4, Sajjad Shirazi5.
Abstract
Background and aims . Different factors affect children's behavior during dental treatment, including psychological and behavioral characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of self-concept on child's anxiety and behavior during dental treatment in 4 to 6-year-old children. Materials and methods. A total of 235 preschoolers aged 4 to 6 years were included in this descriptive analytic study. Total self-concept score for each child was assessed according to Primary Self-concept Scale before dental treatment. Child's anxiety and child's behavior were assessed, during the restoration of mandibular primary molar, using clinical anxiety rating scale and Frankl Scale, respectively. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between the total self-concept score with the results of clinical anxiety rating scale and Frankl Scale. Results. There was a moderate inverse correlation between the self-concept and clinical anxiety rating scale scores (r = -0.545, P < 0.001), and a moderate correlation between the self-concept and child's behavior scores (r = 0.491, P < 0.001). A strong inverse relation was also found between the anxiety and behavior scores (r = -0.91, P < 0.001). Conclusion. Children with higher self-concept had lower anxiety level and better behavioral feedback during dental treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Behavior; child; dental anxiety; self-concept
Year: 2015 PMID: 26697152 PMCID: PMC4682016 DOI: 10.15171/joddd.2015.034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects ISSN: 2008-210X
Anxiety rating scale
| 0. Relaxed, smiling, willing and able to converse |
| 1. Uneasy, concerned; during stressful procedure may protest briefly and quietly to indicate discomfort; hands remain down or partially up to signal discomfort; willing and able to interpret experience as requested; a tense facial expression is evident; may have tears in eyes |
| 2. Child appears scared; tone of voice, questions, and answers reflect anxiety; during stressful procedure, may exhibit verbal protest, quiet cry-ing, and tense and raised (but not interfering) hands; child interprets situation with reasonable accuracy and continues to work to cope with anxiety |
| 3. Shows reluctance to enter situation, difficulty in correctly assessing situational threat; pronounced verbal protest, crying; protest out of pro-portion to threat; copes with situation with great reluctance |
| 4. Anxiety interferes with ability to assess situation; general crying is not related to treatment; body movement is more prominent; child can be reached through verbal communication and, eventually with reluctance and great effort, he begins the work of coping with the threat |
| 5. Child out of contact with the reality of the threat; child cries loudly, is unable to listen to verbal communication, makes no effort to cope with threat, and is actively involved in escape behavior; physical restraint is required |
The relation between self-concept and anxiety based on regression analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -0.380 | 0.038 | -0.552 | 0.304 | <0.001 |
| Dependent variable: Anxiety | |||||
The relation between self-concept and Frankl scores based on regression analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.209 | 0.023 | 0.508 | 0.258 | <0.001 |
| Dependent variable: Frankl scores | |||||