| Literature DB >> 26696760 |
Søren Achim Nielsen1, Michael Kristensen2, Thomas Pape3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the context of a major monitoring program of Culicoides in Denmark and Sweden due to the appearance of bluetongue disease in 2007-2008, a large number of specimens were collected by light traps and sorted morphologically, with COI barcodes generated for selected specimens. NEW INFORMATION: Three species are described as new to science based on both morphological and molecular data: Culicoides (Culicoides) boyi sp. nov. (Denmark: Jutland), C. (C.) selandicus sp. nov. (Denmark: Zealand) and C. (C.) kalix sp. nov. (Sweden: Norrbotten). All are diagnosed morphologically as well as by molecular barcoding. A key to slide-mounted females of all Scandinavian species of Culicoides (Culicoides) is presented.Entities:
Keywords: Biting midges; Scandinavia; molecular barcoding; morphology; new species
Year: 2015 PMID: 26696760 PMCID: PMC4678805 DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e5823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biodivers Data J ISSN: 1314-2828
Figure 1a.Vertex. Scale = 50 µm.
Figure 1b.Antennal pedicellus and first two flagellomeres. Scale = 50 µm.
Figure 1c.Left palp, dorsal view. Scale = 50 µm.
Figure 1d.Wing, brightfield photo. Scale = 500 µm.
Figure 1e.Wing, darkfield photo. Scale = 500 µm.
Figure 1f.Spermathecae. Scale = 50 µm
Figure 2a.Vertex. Scale = 50 µm.
Figure 2b.Antennal pedicellus and first three flagellomeres. Scale = 50 µm.
Figure 2c.Left palp, dorsal view. Scale = 50 µm.
Figure 2d.Wing, brightfield photo. Scale = 500 µm.
Figure 2e.Wing, darkfield photo. Scale = 500 µm.
Figure 3a.Vertex. Scale = 50 µm.
Figure 3c.Left palp, dorsal view. Scale = 50 µm.
Figure 3d.Wing, brightfield photo. Scale = 500 µm.
Figure 3e.Wing, darkfield photo. Scale = 500 µm.
Figure 3f.Spermathecae. Scale = 50 µm.
Pairwise morphometric comparisons between three new species of Culicoides (Culicoides) and the morphologically most similar Scandinavian species, including divergence in COI sequences. The significance of differences between measurements was determined by multiple comparison test after Kruskal-Wallis (PK-w< 0.05) followed by a Conover-Inman test for all pairwise comparisons (Nielsen and Kristensen 2015). Comparisons that are significantly different are shown in yellow highlight.
1 - Species; 2 - Flagellum, length (μm); 3 - Antennal ratio (AR: length of flagellomeres 9–13 divided by length of flagellomeres 1–8); 4 - First flagellomere, length/width; 5 - Maxillary palp, length (μm); 6 - Maxillary palp ratio PR (length/width of third palp segment); 7 - Maxillary palp ratio P3/P2 (length of third maxillary palp segment divided by length of second); 8 - Length of wing (μm); 9 - Spermatheca ratio S/R; 10 - Head/proboscis ratio; 11 - Mandibular teeth; 12 - Maxillary teeth; 13 - Ratio M/M; 14 - Fronto-vertex /ocellus; 15 - Antennal sensilla coeloconica.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 742± 26 | 1.09± 0,03 | 1.52± 0.07 | 255.6± 14.3 | 2.9± 0.2 | 0.84± 0.05 | 1626± 67 | 121± 0.08 | 1.19± 0.04 | 16.7± 1.2 | 19.5± 1.1 | 1.17± 0.08 | 1.2± 0.3 | 15.47± 1.97 |
|
| 746± 44 | 1.03± 0.04 | 1.78± 0.07 | 245.1± 17.7 | 2.9± 0.3 | 1.04± 0.11 | 1641± 10 | 1.05± 0.3 | 1.29± 0.07 | 15.1± 1.2 | 17.1± 1.4 | 1.13± 0.10 | 1.5± 0.2 | 14.71± 1.26 |
| Divergence of COI sequences = 16.5% | ||||||||||||||
|
| 591± 45 | 1.04± 0.05 | 1.53± 0.15 | 193.6± 18.7 | 2.6± 0.2 | 1.11± 0.10 | 1291± 12 | 1.04± 0.02 | 1.32± 0.13 | 13.4± 1.4 | 15.9± 1.5 | 1.18± 0.20 | 0.3± 0.3 | 7.70± 0.67 |
|
| 616± 10 | 1.12± 0.04 | 1.56± 0.11 | 216.8± 8.6 | 3.2± 0.3 | 0.96± 0.06 | 1339± 33 | ND | 1.16± 0.06 | 15.0± 1.0 | 19.6± 1.5 | 1.31± 0.12 | 1.5± 0.8 | 12.29± 0.95 |
| Divergence of COI sequences = 16.2% | ||||||||||||||
|
| 591± 45 | 1.04± 0.05 | 1.53± 0.15 | 193.6± 18.7 | 2.6± 0.2 | 1.11± 0.10 | 1291± 12 | 1.04± 0.02 | 1.32± 0.13 | 13.4± 1.4 | 15.9± 1.5 | 1.18± 0.20 | 0.3± 0.3 | 7.70± 0.67 |
|
| 646± 14 | 1.13± 0.04 | 1.46± 0.06 | 212.4± 4.0 | 2.9± 0.2 | 0.87± 0.08 | 1423± 39 | 1.17± 0.08 | 1.29± 0.07 | 12.8± 0.6 | 14.9± 1.5 | 1.17± 0.12 | 1.2± 0.3 | 10.70± 0.82 |
| Divergence of COI sequences = 15.6% | ||||||||||||||
|
| 616± 10 | 1.12± 0.04 | 1.56± 0.11 | 216.8± 8.6 | 3.2± 0.3 | 0.96± 0.06 | 1339± 33 | ND | 1.16± 0.06 | 15.0± 1.0 | 19.6± 1.5 | 1.31± 0.12 | 1.5± 0.8 | 12.29± 0.95 |
|
| 646± 14 | 1.13± 0.04 | 1.46± 0.06 | 212.4± 4.0 | 2.9± 0.2 | 0.87± 0.08 | 1423± 39 | 1.17± 0.08 | 1.29± 0.07 | 12.8± 0.6 | 14.9± 1.5 | 1.17± 0.12 | 1.2± 0.3 | 10.70± 0.82 |
| Divergence of COI sequences = 5.9% | ||||||||||||||
Figure 4.Cladogram based on COI-data showing clusters of species of Culicoides (s.str.) from western Europe. GenBank numbers with a concluding country code to show geographic origin. Numbers on branches are bootstrap values, and branch lengths are equivalent to computed evolutionary distance (scale at bottom). Redrawn from Lassen et al. 2012b, to whom is referred for details of the analysis.
| 1 | Wing with a spot in cell cu |
|
| – | Wing without a spot in cell cu |
|
| 2 | Third segment of maxillary palp about as long as or longer than the second segment (P3/P2 ≥ 0.94). Wing with the dark hour-glass mark in cell r3 broadest above the longitudinal fold above vein M1 |
|
| – | Third segment of maxillary palp shorter than the second segment (P3/P2 ≤ 0.93). Wing with the dark hour-glass mark in cell r3 broadest above the longitudinal fold above vein M1 or broadest at or below the fold above M1 |
|
| 3 | Wing darkened around the entire length of vein M1 |
|
| – | Wing darkened for some part of vein M1 |
|
| 4 | Wing with two dark marks in cell m1. The dark hour-glass mark in cell r3 is broad and roughly square in outline. Third segment of maxillary palp longer than second segment (P3/P2 > 1.01); PR (palp ratio, i.e., length/width of third segment) < 2.8. Fronto-vertex/ocellus ratio < 0.78 | |
| – | Wing with only one dark mark in cell m1. The dark hour-glass mark in cell r3 is not broad and square in outline. Third segment of maxillary palp at most as long as second segment (P3/P2 ≤ 1.0); PR > 3.0. Fronto-vertex/ocellus ratio > 0.87 |
|
| 5 | Wing with small pale spots at the tip of veins M1, M2, and Cu1. AR (antennal ratio, i.e., length of flagellomeres 9–13 divided by the length of flagellomeres 1–8) > 1.08. Ratio length/width of first flagellomere < 1.6 |
|
| – | Wing without spots at the tip of veins M1, M2 and Cu1. AR < 1.08. Ratio length/width of first flagellomere > 1.7 |
|
| 6 | Wing with the dark hour-glass mark in cell r3 broadest above the longitudinal fold above M1 or hour-glass mark with continuous outline and of equal width above and at the longitudinal fold above vein M1 |
|
| – | Wing with the dark hour-glass mark in cell r3 broadest at or below the longitudinal fold above vein M1 |
|
| 7 | Wing with the dark hour-glass mark in r3 broadest above the longitudinal fold above vein M1. The dark areas in wings surround the entire length of the veins M1 and M2. Mandibular teeth 12–14, maxillary teeth 12–17. Number of antennal sensilla coeloconica 9–12 |
|
| – | Wing with the dark hour-glass mark in cell r3 with continuous outline and equal widths above the longitudinal fold and at the fold above vein M1. The dark areas in wings do not surround veins M1 and M2. Mandibular teeth 16–20, maxillary teeth 19–21. Number of antennal sensilla coeloconica 12–19 |
|
| 8 | Small species (wing length < 1400 µm). Wing markings are faint but sharply defined. Third segment of maxillary palp rhomboid. AR (antennal ratio, i.e., length of flagellomeres 9–13 divided by the length of flagellomeres 1–8) < 1.09. Head/proboscis ratio > 1.26. Number of antennal sensilla coeloconica 7–12 |
|
| – | Large species (wing length > 1600 µm). Wing with extensive and vaguely defined dark markings. Third segment of maxillary palp cigar-shaped. AR > 1.09. Head/proboscis ratio < 1.24. Number of antennal sensilla coeloconica 12–20 |
|
| 9 | Wing with distinct dark markings; the dark hour-glass mark in the middle of cell r3 broadest above the longitudinal fold above the longitudinal fold above cell M1 |
|
| – | Wing with vaguely defined markings; the dark hour-glass mark in cell r3 broadest at or below the fold above M1 |
|
| 10 | PR (palp ratio, i.e., length/width of third segment) < 3.5. Fronto-vertex/ocellus ratio > 1.2 |
|
| – | PR > 3.5. Fronto-vertex/ocellus ratio < 1.0 |
|
| 11 | Small species (wing length < 1400 µm). Third segment of maxillary palp rhomboid. AR (antennal ratio, i.e., length of flagellomeres 9–13 divided by the length of flagellomeres 1–8) < 1.09. Head/proboscis ratio > 1.26. Number of antennal sensilla coeloconica 7–12 |
|
| – | Large species (wing length > 1600 µm). Third segment of maxillary palp cigar-shaped. AR > 1.09. Head/proboscis ratio < 1.24. Number of antennal sensilla coeloconica 12–20 |
|
The problems in constructing reliable keys to adults of the European species of Culicoides (Culicoides) due to overlapping morphometric measures are well known (e.g., Campbell and Pelham-Clinton 1960). Lane 1981 showed how a combination of wing pattern elements and (other) quantitative characters would increase the taxonomic resolution, but we acknowledge that the present key may not be able to allocate every adult individual unambiguously to its 'true' taxonomic species.
Note that we are following Borkent 2014 in treating and as synonyms. Lassen et al. 2012a treated as a species distinct from based on molecular data, but as we have been unable to find morphological features separating these taxa, they will key out together.