Literature DB >> 25589864

When DNA barcoding and morphology mesh: Ceratopogonidae diversity in Finnmark, Norway.

Elisabeth Stur1, Art Borkent2.   

Abstract

DNA barcoding in Ceratopogonidae has been restricted to interpreting the medically and veterinary important members of Culicoides Latreille. Here the technique is utilised, together with morphological study, to interpret all members of the family in a select area. Limited sampling from the county of Finnmark in northernmost Norway indicated the presence of 54 species, including 14 likely new to science, 16 new to Norway, and one new to Europe. No species were previously recorded from this county. Only 93 species were known for all of Norway before this survey, indicating how poorly studied the group is. We evaluate and discuss morphological characters commonly used in identification of biting midges and relate species diagnoses to released DNA barcode data from 223 specimens forming 58 barcode clusters in our dataset. DNA barcodes and morphology were congruent for all species, except in three morphological species where highly divergent barcode clusters indicate the possible presence of cryptic species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrichopogon; Bezzia; Brachypogon; Ceratopogon; Culicoides; Dasyhelea; Forcipomyia; Palpomyia; Probezzia; Serromyia

Year:  2014        PMID: 25589864      PMCID: PMC4294303          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.463.7964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

The (biting midges) are generally small flies with a nearly worldwide distribution; the family includes 6,180 extant species in 111 genera (Borkent 2014a) but undoubtedly, many more undescribed species await discovery. Immatures are found in a wide array of aquatic, semiaquatic and moist terrestrial habitats. Female adults of many species in early lineages of the family suck blood from vertebrates or are ectoparasites on larger insects (e.g. wings of and , caterpillars, phasmids). More derived lineages are predators of primarily nematocerous (e.g. ) (Downes and Wirth 1981). Adults of both sexes imbibe nectar and/or honey dew and some are important pollinators of plants such as cocoa (Glendinning 1972). Numerous species of Skuse, Meigen and Latreille are pests of humans and livestock, having irritating bites and transmitting a wide array of viruses, protozoa and nematodes, including some important diseases (Borkent 2005). Although are common in almost all aquatic and semi-aquatic habitats, many species are small and members of some genera can be notoriously difficult to identify. The family is particularly poorly known taxonomically in Norway, in part due to very limited collecting and a general lack of experts over many years. Presently in Europe, the family has approximately half as many species as the , while in Norway this percentage is considerably lower (15%), as only 93 species of ceratopogonids have been recorded (Soot-Ryen 1943, Mehl 1996, Hagan et al. 2000, Thunes et al. 2004 and Szadziewski et al. 2012 ). Worldwide, however, there are about as many species of (6,180) known as of (6235) (Borkent 2014a, Patrick Ashe pers. comm.). As this limited study of the ceratopogonid fauna of the far north shows, there are many more species of actually present in Norway, with the strong expectation of further species both there and in more southerly habitats once these are systematically collected. Further to this, and particularly pertinent to studies of northern faunas, there have been only a few taxonomic studies comparing Old and New World (Borkent and Bissett 1990; Borkent and Grogan 1995) and we therefore are uncertain about the true identity of some of these. There is an especially strong need to compare species of , Kieffer, Kieffer, , and Kieffer, all genera with numbers of species in the far north and which likely are more broadly distributed in the Holarctic than presently recognized. Of all biting flies, the immatures of are by far the most poorly known, with only limited regional keys to some larvae and pupae of some genera. To a distressing degree, the larvae of the subfamily are morphologically similar and difficult to identify. The pupae are rich in characters and have been recently revised by Borkent (2014b). DNA barcoding is defined as the use of short standardized sequences to identify specimens to species (Hebert et al. 2003). As a natural consequence, DNA barcodes can also be used to analyze species boundaries through genetic comparisons between PageBreaksimilar taxa and provide an objective dataset to be used in the definition of species in addition to morphology, ecology and other species specific characteristics. The 5’ end of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit one (COI) is, since Hebert et al. (2003), regarded as the standard barcode region for animals and has been fairly widely used in (e.g. Ekrem et al. 2010; Renaud et al. 2012, Meiklejohn et al. 2012, Nagy et al. 2013). This marker is also used in the establishment of the Barcode Index Number (BIN) System, a DNA based registry for all animal species using operational taxonomic units as presumptive species (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013). The use of COI-barcodes (or other molecular markers) to interpret species of has barely begun and has focused on distinguishing those species of implicated in the spread of diseases of domestic animals (e.g. Ander et al. 2013; Augot et al. 2013) as well as their hosts and parasites (Santiago-Alarcon et al. 2012). Our broader use here is the first to examine all the species of at a given locality. Being a study of a high latitude fauna, the work provides ample opportunities to make future comparisons with the ceratopogonid fauna from elsewhere and especially from other localities in the northern Holarctic Region. Neither Mehl (1996) in his overview of Norwegian nor The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC’s “Artsobservasjoner” and “Artskart”) have registered any species from the county of Finnmark previous to our work.

Material and methods

Specimens were collected through a survey focusing on selected aquatic insect groups in Finnmark, the northernmost county of mainland Norway. More than 100 different sites were visited in three main trips during the season from June 11 to September 9, 2010 (Ekrem et al. 2012). Since the were not a target group during the sampling, it is likely only a fraction of the existing species have been collected. The majority of were retrieved from eight Malaise traps and only seven additional sites were sampled with sweep nets, dip nets or light trap (Fig. 1). All sample sites are described in Ekrem et al. (2012).
Figure 1.

Sample sites for in Finnmark, Norway, in 2010. Modified after Fig. 2 in Ekrem et al. (2012). Map by Marc Daverdin, NTNU University Museum.

Sample sites for in Finnmark, Norway, in 2010. Modified after Fig. 2 in Ekrem et al. (2012). Map by Marc Daverdin, NTNU University Museum. DNA barcodes were initially used to explore the unknown diversity of from Finnmark. Several specimens of each morphotype were selected under a stereomicroscope and sampled for DNA analysis, typically by removing 1-3 legs. Tissues were shipped to the Biodiversity Institute of Ontario (BIO), Canada for sequencing of partial COI gene sequences. Mainly adult flies of both sexes were sequenced, but two larvae and one pupa were also included. COI amplification and sequencing followed standard protocols at the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding, BIO, including bi-directional Sanger sequencing. A list of barcoded material and all reference numbers are given in the Appendix; protocols, sequences, metadata and photographs of all specimens are available through the public project “ of Finnmark” [FICER] in the Barcode of Life Data Systems 3.0 (BOLD), (www.boldsystems.org, Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007). Since slide mounting is generally needed for morphological species identification of biting midges, selected specimens (representing both sexes when available) from each cluster were slide mounted in Euparal©. The remaining un-mounted midges are preserved in 96% ethanol and stored in a -20 °C freezer. All specimens are deposited in the collection of the NTNU University Museum in Trondheim, Norway. DNA barcodes from each genetic cluster (produced by the neighbor joining algorithm on Kimura 2-parameter genetic distances in BOLD) were compared with all COI sequences in BOLD and GenBank through the BOLD identification engine and GenBank’s MegaBLAST-algorithm (Morgulis et al. 2008) respectively. All instances which produced an identification different from our morphological identification are discussed in the taxonomic treatments below. We used MEGA 5.2 (Tamura et al. 2011) to generate the taxon ID-tree based on the neighbor joining algorithm from aligned COI sequences using partial deletion for areas with gaps and 1000 bootstrap replicates. The taxon ID-tree is not a phylogenetic hypothesis of the included taxa, but a graphic representation of barcode clusters based on genetic Kimura 2-parameter distances. Alignment was performed on protein sequences and was trivial as there were no observed indels and very high similarity on the amino acids level. Tools present in BOLD were used to produce a genetic distance summary and to perform a barcode gap analysis. All analyses were done using Kimura 2-parameter genetic distances (Kimura 1980). Species were identified using taxonomic literature as referenced below (under each genus or species). Sources for records in Norway were Soot-Ryen (1943), Mehl (1996), Hagan et al. (2000), Thunes et al. (2004), and Szadziewski et al. (2012). Comments on European distribution of are based on data published in Fauna Europea (Szadziewski et al. 2012), for North America we relied on the summary distributions given by Borkent and Grogan (2009) and kept updated by the second author.

Results

DNA barcodes were obtained from 223 specimens representing 54 morphological species (Table 1, Fig. 2). Thirty-eight species were represented by more than one specimen from Finnmark and showed a mean intraspecific Kimura 2-parameter distance of 1.6%. Maximum observed intraspecific distance for the complete dataset was considerably higher (11.9%) than the minimum observed interspecific divergence (5.8%). However, at least three morphological species contained multiple BINs (well separated barcode clusters) where cryptic species-level diversity may be present. (Winnertz, 1852) contains two BINs with mean intraspecific distance 4.9%, maximum intraspecific distance 11.9% and distance to nearest neighbor of a different morphospecies 16.9%. Remm, 1962 contains four BINs with mean intraspecific distance 2.2%, maximum intraspecific distance 5.1% and distance to nearest neighbor of a different morphospecies 15.1%. (Edwards, 1921) contains two BINs with mean intraspecific distance 3.2%, maximum intraspecific distance 6.0% and distance to nearest neighbor of a different morphospecies 17.2%. Treating the multiple clusters of these three morphospecies as presumptive (cryptic) species, the maximum intraspecific distance for the whole dataset is 4.0% compared to 5.8% minimum interspecific distance, giving an overall barcode-gap of almost 2%.
Table 1.

Distribution of in Finnmark based on the revised Strand-system (Økland 1981). Species marked with an asterisk (*) are also known from North America (Borkent and Grogan 2009). Division of Finnmark in four regions according to the revised “Strand-system” (Økland 1981): FV = western Finnmark, FI = inner Finnmark, FN = northern Finnmark and FØ = eastern Finnmark.

FVFIFNpreviously recorded in Norway
Forcipomyiinae
Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) hirtidorsum Remm, 1961xx
Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) infuscus Goetghebuer, 1929x
Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) minutus (Meigen, 1830) *xX
Atrichopogon (Lophomyidium) fusculus (Coquillett, 1901) *x
Atrichopogon (Meloehelea) oedemerarum Storå, 1939 *x
Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) alacris (Winnertz, 1852)x
Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustris (Meigen, 1804) *xxX
Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) sp. 6ES nr. palustrisx
Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) bipunctata (Linneus, 1767) *x
Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) squamigera Kieffer, 1916xX
Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) sp. 2ES “bipunctata group”x
Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) sp. 3ES “bipunctata group”x
Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) hygrophila Kieffer, 1925 *xX
Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigra (Winnertz, 1852)xxX
Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigrans Remm, 1962xxxxX
Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) tenuis (Winnertz, 1852)xx
Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) sp. 1ESx
Forcipomyia (Synthyridomyia) acidicola (Tokunaga, 1937) *xX
Forcipomyia (Synthyridomyia) knockensis Goetghebuer, 1938x
Forcipomyia (Thyridomyia) monilicornis (Coquillett, 1905) *xX
Forcipomyia (Thyridomyia) sp. 4ESx
Forcipomyia (Thyridomyia) sp. 5ESx
Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) chaetoptera Remm, 1962x
Dasyheleinae
Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) bensoni Edwards, 1933xX
Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) malleola Remm, 1962 (2 cluster)xX
Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) sp. 4ES nr. bilineata/pallidiventrisxx
Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modesta (Winnertz, 1852)xxX
Dasyhelea (Prokempia) sp. 1ESxx
Dasyhelea (Pseudoculicoides) bifida Zilahi-Sebess, 1936 *x
Dasyhelea (Pseudoculicoides) sp. 2ES mutabilis groupx
Dasyhelea (Pseudoculicoides) sp. 3ES mutabilis groupx
Ceratopogoninae
Culicoidini
Culicoides (Beltramyia) sphagnumensis Williams, 1955 *xX
Culicoides (Beltramyia) salinarius Kieffer, 1914xx
Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescens Edwards, 1939xxxX
Culicoides (Oecacta) albicans Winnertz, 1852xX
Culicoides (Silvaticulicoides) fascipennis (Stæger, 1839)xX
Culicoides (Wirthomyia) minutissimus (Zetterstedt, 1855)x
Culicoides (Wirthomyia) reconditus Campbell & Pelham-Clinton, 1960xX
Ceratopogonini
Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulus (Edwards, 1921)xxX
Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilis (Goetghebuer, 1920)xX
Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp.1ESx
Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ES nr. norvegicus (sp.n.?)x
Ceratopogon abstrusus Borkent & Grogan, 1995 *x
Ceratopogon grandiforceps (Kieffer, 1913)x
Ceratopogon lacteipennis Zetterstedt, 1838xX
Serromyia femorata (Meigen, 1804)xxX
Johannsenomyiini
Probezzia sp. (pupa)x
Palpomyiini
Bezzia annulipes (Meigen, 1830) *x
Bezzia circumdata (Staeger, 1839) *xX
Bezzia rhynchostylata Remm, 1974xX
Palpomyia puberula Remm, 1976x
Palpomyia remmi Havelka, 1974xX
Palpomyia serripes (Meigen, 1818)xX
Ceratopogonidae gen. sp. 1ES (larvae) (Bezzia or Palpomyia)xx
Figure 2.

Taxon-ID tree of the studied specimens based on the neighbor joining algorithm from aligned COI sequences using partial deletion for areas with gaps and 1000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA 5.2. All included sequences were longer than 500 bp. Bootstrap values shown on branches supported by more than 90% of the bootstrap replicates.

Taxon-ID tree of the studied specimens based on the neighbor joining algorithm from aligned COI sequences using partial deletion for areas with gaps and 1000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA 5.2. All included sequences were longer than 500 bp. Bootstrap values shown on branches supported by more than 90% of the bootstrap replicates. Distribution of in Finnmark based on the revised Strand-system (Økland 1981). Species marked with an asterisk (*) are also known from North America (Borkent and Grogan 2009). Division of Finnmark in four regions according to the revised “Strand-system” (Økland 1981): FV = western Finnmark, FI = inner Finnmark, FN = northern Finnmark and FØ = eastern Finnmark. There are two additional morphospecies where the Refined Single Linkage (RESL) analysis in BOLD (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013) produces multiple BINs but where we suspect no more than one species: (Goetghebuer, 1920) has four BINs, a mean intraspecific distance of 1.71%, maximum intraspecific distance of 4.0% and distance to nearest neighbor 13.5%. Remm, 1974 has three BINs, a mean intraspecific distance of 2.4%, maximum intraspecific distance 3.8% and distance to nearest neighbor 17.2%. Both morphology and comparatively low intraspecific distance in these species suggest that the RESL algortithm overestimates presumptive species (as BINs) for these taxa. We also compared our DNA barcodes with the partial COI gene sequences Ander et al. (2013) provided for 37 named PageBreakPageBreak species from Sweden. All species we collected in Finnmark, except for (Zetterstedt, 1855), are represented in their study and our DNA barcodes match 98–100% with the sequences Ander et al. (2013) deposited in GenBank. Identification of Kieffer, 1914 based on morphology is consistent to Ander et al.’s (2013) and not to Wenk et al.’s (2012) interpretation of the species. Voucher material for the COI-sequences published by Wenk et al. (2012) and Ander et al. (2013) was requested from the respective authors, but unfortunately not made available for examination. Thus, we were unable to confirm if the identifications correspond to our morphological interpretation of . Five of the sample sites collected 92% of the investigated specimens and all but one species were found at the five sites FinLoc65, FinLoc05, FinLoc08, FinLoc85, and FinLoc42 (Fig. 1, Ekrem et al. 2012). The most productive location in terms of CeratPageBreakPageBreakPageBreakopogonidae material was one locality in the eastern part of the county (FinLoc65, Malaise 7) in which 72% of all specimens treated were sampled and 41 of 55 species were found. The other Malaise traps collected from 1.4% to 8.4% of the specimens and 3–13 species, while the light trap at the research station (FinLoc85) collected 4.7% of the specimens and four species, including three species not collected elsewhere.

Taxonomic discussion

The “ID” referred to below is the individual DNA barcode specimen ID and serves as a link between the DNA barcode in BOLD and the voucher specimen. The “FinLoc” number denotes the specific collecting sites shown in Figure 1.

We collected adults of five species of representing three subgenera.

Remm, 1961

All three females of key to in Goetghebuer (1934) ( is listed as a synonym of ) and to in Remm (1961) based on the length of the scutal bristles. Material examined. 3♀♀ (ID: FiCer203, FiCer205, FiCer232), 23 July–07 August 2010, FinLoc08, Malaise trap.

Goetghebuer, 1929

The single male of keys to both in Goetghebuer (1934) and Remm (1961). The available descriptions of and are very basic and we have not examined types of these species. Thus, more detailed taxonomic revision of these species may change the identity of our examined specimens. Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer201) 23 July–07 August 2010, FinLoc08, Malaise trap.

(Meigen, 1830)

Of the five species we collected, only has been previously recorded in Norway. The species is easily recognizable both as males and females using Remm’s (1961) and Havelka’s (1976) descriptions. Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer228) 10–23 July 2010, FinLoc08, Malaise trap, 1♀ (ID: FiCer130) 23 July–07 August 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap.

(Coquillett, 1901)

The female of fits the description in Szadsziewski et al. (1996) and is the first species record in the subgenus Cordero in Norway. Material examined. 1♀ (ID: FiCer233) 30 July–10 August 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

Storå, 1939

The two males of closely match Szadsziewski et al.’s (1995) description of the species. Material examined. 2♂♂ (ID: FiCer142, FiCer148) 24 June–20 July 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap. Within the genus we found 18 species distributed in five subgenera (Table 1). For identifying the subgenera we used the key and definitions in Wirth and Ratanaworabhan (1978), Debenham (1987), and a key to the subgenera restricted to Fennoscandia and northern Europe (Borkent unpublished). Alwin and Szadziewksi (2013) recently published a key to the subgenera present in Poland and confirms subgeneric identifications here. Identification of at the species level are mostly based on the key and figures in Remm (1962), however, additional literature is used in individual cases (see below).

(Winnertz, 1852)

has been previously recorded in Norway. Material examined. 3♂♂ (ID: FiCer121, FiCer156, FiCer161) 24 June–20 July 2010; 1♂ (ID: FiCer75) 30 July–10 August 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

(Meigen, 1804)

has been previously recorded in Norway. The males match the description of Szadziewski (1986). Material examined. 3♂♂ (ID: FiCer24, FiCer104, FiCer108), and 3♀♀ (ID: FiCer41, FiCer42, FiCer98), 19–24 June 2010, 4♀♀ (ID: FiCer95, FiCer125, FiCer155, FiCer159) 24 June–20 July 2010, 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer239, FiCer240) 30 July–10 August 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

sp. 6ES nr. palustris

sp. 6ES nr. palustris is a species morphologically similar to but differs in subtle differences in the male genitalia: The gonocoxal apodemes are narrower apically and with very short lateral projections and posteriorly the ventral prong is more slender and elongate. Material examined. 4♂♂ (ID: FiCer19, FiCer20, FiCer25, FiCer113) 19–24 June 2010, 1♀ (ID: FiCer76) 30 July–10 August 2010, 1♀ (ID: FiCer174) 24 June–20 July 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap, 1♀ (ID: FiCer215) 11–26 June 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap, 1♂ (ID: FiCer224) 19 June 2010, netting.

(Linnaeus, 1767)

The single male was identified as following the description of this species by Szadziewski et al. (2007). Additionally, the key and figures in Remm (1962) were consulted. Szadziewski et al. (2007) revised the European bipunctata species group of the subgenus and included , , (Winnertz, 1852), and Edwards, 1924. Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer57) 08 September 2010, FinLoc85, light trap.

Kieffer, 1916

The single male was identified as based on the description of the species in Szadziewski et al. (2007). Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer146) 24 June–20 July 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

sp. 2ES bipunctata group

The females of sp. 2ES have lanceolate setae on all tibiae and elongated seminal capsules. They seem to belong within the bipunctata group (Szadziewski et al. 2007). For species determination an association with male specimens is necessary. Whether these two specimens belong to one or two species is not clear. More material and associations are necessary for accurate determination. Material examined. 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer54, FiCer96) 07 and 08 September 2010, FinLoc85, light trap.

sp. 3ES bipunctata group

The single female, sp. 3ES, with lanceaolate setae on mid and hind tibia, fits within the bipunctata group (Szadziewski et al. 2007). The larger setae on fore tibia are missing (broken) and could be lanceolate or not. This specimen has a wing length of 1.7 mm, like the largest species of this group, (Winnertz, 1852). Material examined. 1♀ (ID: FiCer134) 23 July–07 August 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap.

Kieffer, 1925

has been previously recorded in Norway. Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer220) 19 June 2010, FinLoc77, netting, 1♀ (ID: FiCer212) 11–26 June 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap.

sp. 1ES

The single female specimen of sp. 1ES, is genetically relatively close to but easy to distinguish morphologically (e.g. by the shape of the palpus) (Fig. 3).
Figure 3.

A, B female A terminalia, in ventral view B head, in anterior view C, D sp. 1 female C terminalia, in ventral view D head, in anterior view.

Material examined. 1♀ (ID: FiCer214) 11–26 June 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap. A, B female A terminalia, in ventral view B head, in anterior view C, D sp. 1 female C terminalia, in ventral view D head, in anterior view. has been previously recorded in Norway. Material examined. 4 ♂♂ (ID: FiCer9, FiCer10, FiCer16, FiCer17) 19–24 June 2010, 1♂ (ID: FiCer94) 24 June–20 July 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap. 1♀ (ID: FiCer210) 11–26 June 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap, 2♂♂ (ID: FiCer221, FiCer222) 19 June 2010, FinLoc67, netting, 1♂ (ID: FiCer223) 19 June 2010, FinLoc81, netting.

Remm, 1962

has been previously recorded in Norway. Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer59), 1♀ (ID: FiCer60) both 24 July–06 August 2010, FinLoc19, 1♂ (ID: FiCer90) and 1♀ (ID: FiCer91) both 24 July–06 August 2010, FinLoc21, 1♀ (ID: FiCer145) 24 June–20 July 2010, 1♀ (ID: FiCer83) 20–30 July 2010, 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer73, FiCer238) 30 July–10 August 2010, all four specimens FinLoc65, 1♀ (ID: FiCer89) 25 August–09 September 2010, FinLoc56, 1♀ (ID: FiCer199) 23 July–07 August 2010 FinLoc05, all Malaise trap. has not been recorded from Scandinavia before, but is known from many other European countries. Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer46) 17 June 2010, FinLoc36, 1♂ (ID: FiCer219) 19 June 2010, FinLoc77, 2♂♂ (ID: FiCer225, FiCer226) 13 June 2010, FinLoc06, all netting, 1♂ (ID: FiCer231) 20–30 July 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

(Tokunaga, 1937)

Three species of the subgenus are known from Europe. The single female specimen from Finnmark fits the diagnosis of the subgenus (Wirth and Ratanaworabhan 1978) and Tokunaga’s (1937) description of the species. has been previously recorded in Norway (Thunes et al. 2004). Material examined. 1♀ (ID: FiCer157) 24 June–20 July 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

Goetghebuer, 1938

The identification of this species is based on the key of Remm (1962) and the redescription by Szadziewski (1983). Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer84) 20.–30. June 2010, 2♂♂ (ID: FiCer144, FiCer153) & 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer147, FiCer164) 24 June–20 July 2010, 1♀ (ID: FiCer237) 30 July–10 August 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

(Coquillett, 1905)

The species has been previously recorded in Norway. Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer150) 24 June–20 July 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

sp. 4ES

Three species within the subgenus could be distinguished: , as well as two unnamed species sp. 4ES, and sp. 5ES. The two latter have only been collected as females (Fig. 4).
Figure 4.

A, B sp. 5 female A terminalia, in ventral view B head, in anterior view C, D sp. 4 female C terminalia, in ventral view D head, in anterior view.

Material examined. 1♀ (ID: FiCer162) 24 June–20 July 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap. A, B sp. 5 female A terminalia, in ventral view B head, in anterior view C, D sp. 4 female C terminalia, in ventral view D head, in anterior view.

sp. 5ES

Material examined. 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer122, FiCer152) 24 June–20 July 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap. The male and female key to using Remm (1962). Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer111) 19–24 June 2010 & 1♀ (ID: FiCer149) 24 June–20 July 2010, both FinLoc65, Malaise trap. The Polish species of this genus have recently been revised by Dominiak (2012) which included 30 of the 63 (Dominiak and Szadziewski 2010) known European species.

Edwards, 1933

is not included in Dominiak’s (2012) key but the species is discussed within the description of (Goetghebuer, 1931) in her work. An allocation of the two Finnmark females to the species is not definite since the palpal setae are missing on both specimens and no associated males have been collected. has been previously recorded in Norway. Material examined. 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer117, FiCer190) 24 June–20 July 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

Remm, 1962 (2 cluster)

There are two clusters of specimens, both including males and females, which key out to and fit within the description for the species provided by Dominiak (2012). Whether or not these specimens are members of one or two species requires more material and a Holarctic revision of the genus. has been previously recorded in Norway. Between the males, no significant differences could be observed. The females however, differ in the shape of the posterior portion of sternite 9 (projecting anteriorly): subgenital fig elongate and vase shape in FiCer44 (Fig. 5) and widened in FiCer66, FiCer120, FiCer191 and FiCer243 (Fig. 5 and figure 39 in Dominiak (2012)). The spermatheca of specimen FiCer44 lacked pores and the extension was narrow; spermathecae of specimens FiCer191, FiCer120, FiCer243, and FiCer66 were with pores and the extension thicker). Since we only have one single male and female in the cluster of it has to be confirmed with more material if the differences are consistent between the two forms.
Figure 5.

Female terminalia, in ventral view A B .

Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer27) and 1♀ (ID: FiCer44) 19–24 June 2010, 1♂ (ID: FiCer189) and 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer120, FiCer191) 24 June–20 July 2010, 1♀ (ID: FiCer243) 20–30 July 2010, 1♀ (ID: FiCer66), 30 July–08 August 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap, 1♂ (ID: FiCer211) 11–26 June 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap. Female terminalia, in ventral view A B .

sp. 4ES nr. bilineata/pallidiventris

The male and females of sp. 4ES do not key to any of the species included in Dominiak’s (2012) key. Comparing the specimens with the provided species descriptions puts the species close to Goetghebuer, 1920 and . Material examined. 1♀ (ID: FiCer40) 19–24 June 2010, 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer115, FiCer116) 24 June–20 July 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap. 1♂ (ID: FiCer202) 23 July–07 August 2010, FiLoc08, Malaise trap. Several specimens, both males and females, could be assigned to (Winnertz, 1852). They fit Dominiak’s (2012) interpretation of the species. The genetic distances for CO1 within the species cluster, however, can be as much as 10%, indicating the possibility of more than one species under this name. Material examined. 8♂♂ (ID: FiCer8, FiCer28, FiCer29, FiCer100, FiCer102, FiCer107, FiCer109, FiCer114) and 3♀♀ (ID: FiCer37, FiCer38, FiCer39) 19–24 June 2010, 1♂ (ID: FiCer81) 20–30 July 2010 all FinLoc65, Malaise trap, 1♀ (ID: FiCer204) 23 July–07 August 2010, FiLoc08, Malaise trap. All sampled sp. 1ES specimens are females of the subgenus . Species identification is only presently possible with males. Material examined. 1♀ (ID: FiCer118) 19–24 June 2010, 1♀ (ID: FiCer194) 24 June–20 July 2010, 1♀ (ID: FiCer244) 20–30 July 2010, 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer63, FiCer65) 30 July–08 August 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap, 1♀ (ID: FiCer216) 11–26 June 2010 FinLoc05, Malaise trap.

Zilahi-Sebess, 1936

Of the three species collected, only could be named. sp. 2ES and sp. 3ES are members of the mutabilis group sensu Waugh and Wirth (1976). Associations to males are presently necessary to determine the nominal species. Material examined. 1♂ (ID: FiCer18) 19–24 June 2010 FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

sp. 2ES

Material examined. 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer35, FiCer45) 19–24 June 2010 FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

sp. 3ES

Material examined. 3♀♀ (ID: FiCer119, FiCer) 24 June–20 July 2010 FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

Within the genus we found seven species representing five subgenera. For identification, the keys and descriptions of Glukhova (2005) were used and, in addition, the key and descriptions in Campbell and Pelham-Clinton (1959) and Delécolle (1985) were consulted.
Williams, 1955
Material examined. 1♀ (FiCer77) 30 July–10 August 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.
Kieffer, 1914
The males of this species key to in Delécolle (1985). The wings of these specimens have a single pale spot over r-m and CuA2 is dark, also features of females of this species. Material examined. 2♂♂ (FiCer1, FiCer2) 19–24 June 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap. 1♂ (FiCer47) 15 June–02 July 2010, FinLoc42, Malaise trap.
Edwards, 1939
Material examined. 2♂♂ (FiCer93, FiCer173) 24 June–20 July 2010, 1♂ (FiCer79) 20–30 July 2010, 2♂♂ (FiCer68, FiCer70) and 3♀♀ (FiCer67, FiCer69, FiCer71) 30 July–08 August 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap, 1♂ (FiCer195) and 1♀ (FiCer131) 23 July–07 August 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap, 1♂ (FiCer88) 25 August–09 September 2010, FinLoc56, Malaise trap, 3♂♂ (FiCer50, FiCer55, FiCer58) and 2♀♀ (FiCer51, FiCer53) 08 September 2010, FinLoc85, light trap.
Winnertz, 1852
Material examined. 1♂ (FiCer23) 19–24 June 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.
(Stæger, 1839)
Material examined. 2♀♀ (FiCer52, FiCer56) 08 September 2010, FinLoc85, light trap.
(Zetterstedt, 1855)
Material examined. 1♀ (FiCer180) 24 June–20 July 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.
Campbell & Pelham-Clinton, 1960
Material examined. 1♂ (FiCer86) 10 - 23 July 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap, 1♀ (FiCer206) 23 July–07 August 2010, FinLoc08, Malaise trap.

Genus

The species collected in Finnmark all belong to the subgenus .
(Edwards, 1921)
As mentioned above, there are two clearly divergent clusters of DNA barcodes from specimens identified as , with a maximum Kimura 2-parameter distance of 5.98% (Figure 2). Specimens from the two clusters were collected at the same time and place and no morphological distinction is observed. We suspect that the fairly large observed COI divergence indicates possible cryptic species in this group. has been previously recorded in Norway. The male specimens of the cluster with FiCer04 have a relatively stout palpal segment 3, the males of cluster with FiCer05 have a more slender palpal segment 3. Material examined. 7♂♂ (ID: FiCer4, FiCer5, FiCer6, FiCer15, FiCer30, FiCer106, FiCer245) and 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer34, FiCer247) 19–24 June 2010, 3♂♂ (ID: FiCer137, FiCer138, FiCer187) and 4♀♀ (ID: FiCer182, FiCer184, FiCer188) 24 June–20 July 2010, 1♀ (ID: FiCer241) 20–30 July 2010, 1♀ (ID: FiCer234) 30 July–10 August 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap, 1♀ (ID: FiCer49) 15 June–02 July 2010, FinLoc42, Malaise trap.
(Goetghebuer, 1920)
has been previously recorded in Norway. Material examined. 3♂♂ (ID: FiCer14, FiCer101, FiCer110) and 3♀♀ (ID: FiCer33, FiCer43, FiCer246) 19–24 June 2010, 2♂♂ (ID: FiCer183, FiCer185) and 1♀ (ID: FiCer186) 24 June–20 July 2010, 1♂ (ID: FiCer80) and 1♀ (ID: FiCer242) 20–30 July 2010, 2♂♂ (ID: FiCer62, FiCer64) and 2♀♀ (ID: FiCer74, FiCer236) 30 July–10 August 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap, 1♂ (ID: FiCer197) 23 July–07 August 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap.
sp. 1ES
sp.1ES keys to (Kieffer, 1925) in Szadziewski et al. (1994), but does not entirely fit their species description (e.g. differently shaped aedeagus). Material examined. 1♂ (FiCer105) 19–24 June 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.
sp. 2ES
sp. 2ES is a species similar to Szadziewski & Hagan, 2000 but with a differently shaped aedeagus. The species is possibly new to science. Material examined. ♂♂ (FiCer21, FiCer22, FiCer26, FiCer31, FiCer99, FiCer112) 19–24 June 2010, ♂ (FiCer141) 24 June–20 July 2010, ♂ (FiCer229) 20–30 July 2010, 1♀ (FiCer235) 30 July–10 August 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap. All identifications are based on the generic revision by Borkent and Grogan (1995).
Borkent & Grogan, 1995
was described by Borkent and Grogan (1995) from the Nearctic with a wide range from Alaska to northern Greenland and has been referred by them as “the most broadly distributed of all species”. The record from Finnmark is the first for the Palearctic (other than northern Greenland). Material examined. 2♂♂ (FiCer12, FiCer13) 19–24 June 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.
(Kieffer, 1913)
from Finnmark is the first record for Fennoscandia. Material examined. 1♂ (FiCer48) 15 June–02 July 2010, FinLoc42, Malaise trap.
Zetterstedt, 1838
has been previously recorded in northern Norway (Senja) and other localities in Norway (Thunes et al. 2004, Hagan et al. 2000). Material examined. 3♂♂ (FiCer136, FiCer165, FiCer166) 24 June–20 July 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.
(Meigen, 1804)
This species has been previously recorded in Norway and was redescribed by Borkent and Bissett (1990). Material examined. 1♂ (FiCer208) 10–23 July 2010, FinLoc08, Malaise trap, 1♀ (ID: FiCer143) 24 June–20 July 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.
sp.
A single pupa was collected in a drift sample (see Fig. 9 in Ekrem et al. 2012). The pupa from Finnmark is the first record of this genus for Norway. Three European species of are Holarctic in distribution (Wirth 1971). The specimen was identified to genus using the key to genera by Borkent (2014b). Material examined. 1 pupa (Finnmark792) 19 June 2010, FinLoc92, drift.
(Meigen, 1830)
The specimen from Finnmark fits the description in Remm (1974a) and Wirth et al. (1984) for this Holarctic species. This is the first record of the species in Norway. Material examined. 1♂ (FiCer3) 19–24 June 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.
(Staeger, 1839)
The species keys to (Winnertz, 1852) in Remm 1974a which is currently considered a synonym of . Material examined. 1♀ (FiCer61) 30 July–08 August 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.
Remm, 1974
The species keys to in Remm 1974b. Material examined. 2♂♂ (FiCer7, FiCer11) and 2♀♀ (FiCer32, FiCer36) 19–24 June 2010, FinLoc65, Malaise trap.
Remm, 1976
The examined female keys to and fits the description of in Remm (1976). Material examined. 1♀ (FiCer133) 23 July–07 August 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap.
Havelka, 1974
The Finnmark specimens fit the description by Havelka (1974). Krzywinski (1997) records the species for the first time in Norway and mentions that the species could be conspecific to the North American Grogan & Wirth, 1979. If the two species are conspecific, would have a Holarctic distribution. Material examined. 1♂ (FiCer227) 10–23 July 2010 and 3♂♂ (FiCer200, FiCer207, FiCer209) 23 July–07 August 2010, FinLoc08, Malaise trap, 2♀♀ (FiCer85, FiCer87) 10–23 July 2010 and 1♀ (FiCer132, FiCer198) 23 July–07 August 2010, FinLoc05, Malaise trap.
(Meigen, 1818)
The examined males and females key to and fit the description of in Remm (1976). The species seems to have a “north-south” rather than a circumpolar distribution. Material examined. 1♂ (FiCer92) and 4♀♀ (FiCer167, FiCer168, Ficer169, FiCer170) 24 June–20 July 2010, 1♀ (FiCer78) 20–30 July 2010, all FinLoc65, Malaise trap.

gen. sp. 1ES

The larvae belong to either or . For further identification association with the adult is required. Material examined. 2 larvae (FiCer217, FiCer218) 14 June 2010, FinLoc07, benthos.

Discussion

Our relatively cursory sampling of revealed a startling 54 species within nine genera. Of these, 40 could be identified to previously named species, and 14 are apparently either undescribed or are close to previously known species. Considering that no have been previously recorded from Finnmark, this is PageBreaka substantial increase in numbers and reflects the poorly sampled and interpreted state of this diverse and common family in northern Norway. There are several impediments to our understanding this group in Finnmark. For example, much of our collecting, especially with hand nets, was not focused on , which often require a less delicate sweeping mode than is best for . Most of our specimens were collected with Malaise traps, especially with the trap at locality FinLoc65. Even with these considerable limitations, we uncovered a substantial diversity. Certainly, with further concerted sampling in Finnmark, we would expect to find a significantly more diverse fauna than reported here. A second impediment to understanding in Finnmark, Norway and Europe in general is the major gaps in taxonomic revisions. For most genera, there are no inclusive European keys, based on examination of types and comparative material and most current revisions are regional or country specific. Even the continent-wide threat of Bluetongue and the Schmallenberg virus, resulting in millions of Euros in losses to livestock, has failed as an incentive to produce a comprehensive taxonomic analysis of the species of , some of which act as vectors of these diseases. Further to this, very few revisions have compared Palaearctic and Nearctic species, especially important for northern taxa, and this has made an understanding of the distributions of many species uncertain. In some instances, it is very likely that some Palaearctic and Nearctic species, presently with different names, are actually conspecific. To complete comprehensive revisions, authors should check all available types. This too is an impediment to our understanding of a number of genera. Many species names are floating because no one has examined the types since they were first described (in some cases over 150 years ago!). Much of this reflects the general state of support for taxonomy, which is generally poor to non-existent. In the meantime, the are a case in point for the value of future studies. Many species live in peripheral aquatic habitats (edges of streams, ponds and marshes) or in very small water bodies (springs, small pools), habitats that are often under extreme threat on our planet. A better understanding of the fauna of these habitats would reinforce the concept that they need to be protected. One advantage of the present study, despite the lack of some species names, is that every investigated specimen is DNA barcoded and kept as a voucher in a public collection. This makes it possible to include them in further taxonomic studies, and to associate other life stages at a later point in time when obtained. For morphological species that are represented by more than one barcode cluster (such as or ), detailed reexamination of vouchers will be required to discover possible morphological traits that may distinguish new taxa. Moreover, as Anderson et al. (2013) found for the chironomid genus , detailed comparison of multiple life stages, ecology and nuclear molecular markers should clarify whether some of the highly divergent barcode clusters obtained in our study actually represent different biological species.
Appendix

Overview of sequenced specimens and species from Finnmark.

Sample IDSpeciesLife StageLocalityCollection DateCollectorsGenBank Accession
FiCer203Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) hirtidorsumadultFinLoc0807-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767865
FiCer205Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) hirtidorsumadultFinLoc0807-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767866
FiCer232Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) hirtidorsumadultFinLoc0807-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767867
FiCer201Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) infuscusadultFinLoc0807-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767868
FiCer130Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) minutusadultFinLoc0527-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767869
FiCer228Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) minutusadultFinLoc0823-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767870
FiCer233Atrichopogon (Lophomyidium) fusculusadultFinLoc6510-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767864
FiCer148Atrichopogon (Meleohelea) oedemarumadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767871
FiCer142Atrichopogon (Meleohelea) oedemarumadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767872
FiCer156Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) alacrisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768001
FiCer121Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) alacrisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768002
FiCer75Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) alacrisadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768003
FiCer161Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) alacrisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768004
FiCer239Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6510-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768036
FiCer104Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768037
FiCer108Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768038
FiCer24Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768039
FiCer155Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768040
FiCer125Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768041
FiCer95Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768042
FiCer98Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768043
FiCer240Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6510-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768044
FiCer159Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768045
FiCer41Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768046
FiCer42Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) palustrisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768047
FiCer25Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) sp. 6ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768055
FiCer215Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) sp. 6ESadultFinLoc0526-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768056
FiCer174Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) sp. 6ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768057
FiCer224Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) sp. 6ESadultFinLoc8119-Jun-2010T. Ekrem, E. SturKJ768058
FiCer113Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) sp. 6ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768059
FiCer76Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) sp. 6ESadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768060
FiCer19Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) sp. 6ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768061
FiCer20Forcipomyia (Euprojoannisia) sp. 6ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768062
FiCer57Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) bipunctataadultFinLoc6508-Sep-2010T. AndersenKJ768005
FiCer146Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) squamigeraadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768063
FiCer54Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc8508-Sep-2010T. AndersenKJ768049
FiCer96Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc8507-Sep-2010T. AndersenKJ768050
FiCer134Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) sp. 3ESadultFinLoc0527-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768051
FiCer212Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) hygrophilaadultFinLoc0526-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768008
FiCer220Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) hygrophilaadultFinLoc7719-Jun-2010T. Ekrem, E. SturKJ768009
FiCer9Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigraadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768017
FiCer222Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigraadultFinLoc6719-Jun-2010T. Ekrem, E. SturKJ768018
FiCer221Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigraadultFinLoc6719-Jun-2010T. Ekrem, E. SturKJ768019
FiCer210Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigraadultFinLoc0526-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768020
FiCer17Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigraadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768021
FiCer16Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigraadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768022
FiCer94Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigraadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768023
FiCer10Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigraadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768024
FiCer223Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigraadultFinLoc8119-Jun-2010T. Ekrem, E. SturKJ768025
FiCer83Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigransadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768026
FiCer145Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigransadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768027
FiCer91Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigransadultFinLoc2106-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768028
FiCer90Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigransadultFinLoc2106-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768029
FiCer89Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigransadultFinLoc5609-Sep-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768030
FiCer238Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigransadultFinLoc6510-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768031
FiCer199Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigransadultFinLoc0507-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768032
FiCer73Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigransadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768033
FiCer60Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigransadultFinLoc1906-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768034
FiCer59Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) nigransadultFinLoc1906-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768035
FiCer231Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) tenuisadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768064
FiCer226Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) tenuisadultFinLoc0613-Jun-2010T. Ekrem, E. SturKJ768065
FiCer225Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) tenuisadultFinLoc0613-Jun-2010T. Ekrem, E. SturKJ768066
FiCer219Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) tenuisadultFinLoc7719-Jun-2010T. Ekrem, E. SturKJ768067
FiCer46Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) tenuisadultFinLoc3617-Jun-2010E. SturKJ768068
FiCer214Forcipomyia (Forcipomyia) sp. 1ESadultFinLoc0526-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768048
FiCer157Forcipomyia (Synthyridomyia) acidicolaadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768000
FiCer237Forcipomyia (Synthyridomyia) knockensisadultFinLoc6510-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768010
FiCer84Forcipomyia (Synthyridomyia) knockensisadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768011
FiCer147Forcipomyia (Synthyridomyia) knockensisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768012
FiCer144Forcipomyia (Synthyridomyia) knockensisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768013
FiCer153Forcipomyia (Synthyridomyia) knockensisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768014
FiCer164Forcipomyia (Synthyridomyia) knockensisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768015
FiCer150Forcipomyia (Thyridomyia) monilicornisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768016
FiCer162Forcipomyia (Thyridomyia) sp. 4ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768052
FiCer122Forcipomyia (Thyridomyia) sp. 5ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768053
FiCer152Forcipomyia (Thyridomyia) sp. 5ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768054
FiCer111Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) chaetopteraadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768006
FiCer149Forcipomyia (Trichohelea) chaetopteraadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768007
FiCer190Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) bensoniadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767961
FiCer117Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) bensoniadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767962
FiCer211Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) malleolaadultFinLoc0526-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767964
FiCer44Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) malleolaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767965
FiCer27Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) malleolaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767966
FiCer66Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) malleolaadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767967
FiCer120Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) malleolaadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767968
FiCer191Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) malleolaadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767969
FiCer189Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) malleolaadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767970
FiCer243Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) malleolaadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767971
FiCer202Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) sp. 4ESadultFinLoc0807-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767996
FiCer40Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) sp. 4ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767997
FiCer116Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) sp. 4ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767998
FiCer115Dasyhelea (Dasyhelea) sp. 4ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767999
FiCer107Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767972
FiCer81Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767973
FiCer204Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc0807-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767974
FiCer39Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767975
FiCer38Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767976
FiCer37Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767977
FiCer100Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767978
FiCer29Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767979
FiCer102Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767980
FiCer28Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767981
FiCer8Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767982
FiCer114Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767983
FiCer109Dasyhelea (Dicryptoscena) modestaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767984
FiCer63Dasyhelea (Prokempia) sp. 1ESadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767985
FiCer65Dasyhelea (Prokempia) sp. 1ESadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767986
FiCer118Dasyhelea (Prokempia) sp. 1ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767987
FiCer194Dasyhelea (Prokempia) sp. 1ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767988
FiCer216Dasyhelea (Prokempia) sp. 1ESadultFinLoc0526-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767989
FiCer244Dasyhelea (Prokempia) sp. 1ESadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767990
FiCer18Dasyhelea (Pseudoculicoides) bifidaadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767963
FiCer35Dasyhelea (Pseudoculicoides) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767991
FiCer45Dasyhelea (Pseudoculicoides) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767992
FiCer193Dasyhelea (Pseudoculicoides) sp. 3ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767993
FiCer192Dasyhelea (Pseudoculicoides) sp. 3ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767994
FiCer119Dasyhelea (Pseudoculicoides) sp. 3ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767995
FiCer1Culicoides (Beltramyia) salinariusadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767957
FiCer2Culicoides (Beltramyia) salinariusadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767958
FiCer47Culicoides (Beltramyia) salinariusadultFinLoc4202-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767959
FiCer77Culicoides (Beltramyia) sphagnumensisadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767960
FiCer88Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc5609-Sep-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767938
FiCer131Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc0527-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767939
FiCer195Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc0507-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767940
FiCer50Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc8508-Sep-2010T. AndersenKJ767941
FiCer51Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc8508-Sep-2010T. AndersenKJ767942
FiCer53Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc8508-Sep-2010T. AndersenKJ767943
FiCer55Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc8508-Sep-2010T. AndersenKJ767944
FiCer58Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc8508-Sep-2010T. AndersenKJ767945
FiCer93Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767946
FiCer67Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767947
FiCer68Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767948
FiCer69Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767949
FiCer70Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767950
FiCer71Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767951
FiCer173Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767952
FiCer79Culicoides (Culicoides) grisescensadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767953
FiCer23Culicoides (Oecacta) albicansadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767935
FiCer52Culicoides (Silvaticulicoides) fascipennisadultFinLoc8508-Sep-2010T. AndersenKJ767936
FiCer56Culicoides (Silvaticulicoides) fascipennisadultFinLoc8508-Sep-2010T. AndersenKJ767937
FiCer180Culicoides (Wirthomyia) minutissimusadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767954
FiCer206Culicoides (Wirthomyia) reconditusadultFinLoc0807-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767955
FiCer86Culicoides (Wirthomyia) reconditusadultFinLoc0523-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767956
FiCer4Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767879
FiCer5Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767880
FiCer6Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767881
FiCer106Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767882
FiCer137Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767883
FiCer241Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767884
FiCer138Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767885
FiCer30Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767886
FiCer234Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6510-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767887
FiCer15Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767888
FiCer247Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767889
FiCer188Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767890
FiCer187Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767891
FiCer49Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc4202-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767892
FiCer245Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767893
FiCer184Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767894
FiCer181Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767895
FiCer182Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767896
FiCer34Brachypogon (Isohelea) nitidulusadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767897
FiCer110Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767898
FiCer246Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767899
FiCer242Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767900
FiCer14Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767901
FiCer236Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6510-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767902
FiCer183Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767903
FiCer101Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767904
FiCer33Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767905
FiCer185Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767906
FiCer43Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767907
FiCer186Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767908
FiCer62Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767909
FiCer64Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767910
FiCer74Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767911
FiCer80Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767912
FiCer197Brachypogon (Isohelea) sociabilisadultFinLoc0507-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767913
FiCer105Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 1ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767914
FiCer97Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767915
FiCer99Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767916
FiCer103Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767917
FiCer26Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767918
FiCer112Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767919
FiCer22Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767920
FiCer229Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767921
FiCer21Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767922
FiCer141Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767923
FiCer235Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6510-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767924
FiCer139Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767925
FiCer31Brachypogon (Isohelea) sp. 2ESadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767926
FiCer12Ceratopogon abstrususadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767927
FiCer13Ceratopogon abstrususadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767928
FiCer48Ceratopogon grandiforcepsadultFinLoc4202-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767929
FiCer166Ceratopogon lacteipennisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767932
FiCer136Ceratopogon lacteipennisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767933
FiCer165Ceratopogon lacteipennisadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767934
FiCer143Serromyia femorataadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768085
FiCer208Serromyia femorataadultFinLoc0823-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768086
Finnmark792ProbezziapupaFinLoc9219-Jun-2010G.A. HalvorsenKJ768084
FiCer3Bezzia annulipesadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767873
FiCer61Bezzia circumdataadultFinLoc6508-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767874
FiCer7Bezzia rhynchostylataadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767875
FiCer36Bezzia rhynchostylataadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767876
FiCer11Bezzia rhynchostylataadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767877
FiCer32Bezzia rhynchostylataadultFinLoc6524-Jun-2010Ekrem et al.KJ767878
FiCer133Palpomyia puberulaadultFinLoc0527-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768069
FiCer85Palpomyia remmiadultFinLoc0523-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768070
FiCer227Palpomyia remmiadultFinLoc0823-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768071
FiCer209Palpomyia remmiadultFinLoc0823-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768072
FiCer207Palpomyia remmiadultFinLoc0823-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768073
FiCer200Palpomyia remmiadultFinLoc0807-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768074
FiCer198Palpomyia remmiadultFinLoc0507-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768075
FiCer87Palpomyia remmiadultFinLoc0523-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768076
FiCer132Palpomyia remmiadultFinLoc0527-Aug-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768077
FiCer168Palpomyia serripesadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768078
FiCer92Palpomyia serripesadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768079
FiCer170Palpomyia serripesadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768080
FiCer78Palpomyia serripesadultFinLoc6530-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768081
FiCer169Palpomyia serripesadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768082
FiCer167Palpomyia serripesadultFinLoc6520-Jul-2010Ekrem et al.KJ768083
FiCer218Ceratopogonidae gen. sp. 1ESlarvaFinLoc0714-Jun-2011T. Ekrem, E. SturKJ767930
FiCer217Ceratopogonidae gen. sp. 1ESlarvaFinLoc0714-Jun-2010T. Ekrem, E. SturKJ767931
  14 in total

1.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  M Kimura
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Phylogenetic utility of five genes for dipteran phylogeny: a test case in the Chironomidae leads to generic synonymies.

Authors:  Torbjørn Ekrem; Endre Willassen; Elisabeth Stur
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  Characterization of two cryptic species, Culicoides stigma and C.parroti (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), based on barcode regions and morphology.

Authors:  Denis Augot; Camille Ninio; Mohammad Akhoundi; Véronique Lehrter; Arnaud Couloux; Damien Jouet; Jérôme Depaquit
Journal:  J Vector Ecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Barcoding of biting midges in the genus Culicoides: a tool for species determination.

Authors:  M Ander; K Troell; J Chirico
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.739

7.  A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the barcode index number (BIN) system.

Authors:  Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  DNA barcoding of Northern Nearctic Muscidae (Diptera) reveals high correspondence between morphological and molecular species limits.

Authors:  Anaïs K Renaud; Jade Savage; Sarah J Adamowicz
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.964

9.  Database indexing for production MegaBLAST searches.

Authors:  Aleksandr Morgulis; George Coulouris; Yan Raytselis; Thomas L Madden; Richa Agarwala; Alejandro A Schäffer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  bold: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org).

Authors:  Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Mol Ecol Notes       Date:  2007-05-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Culicoides species community composition and feeding preferences in two aquatic ecosystems in northern Spain.

Authors:  Mikel A González; Fátima Goiri; Sean W J Prosser; Aitor Cevidanes; Luis M Hernández-Triana; Jesús F Barandika; Paul D N Hebert; Ana L García-Pérez
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Three new Scandinavian species of Culicoides (Culicoides): Culicoides boyi sp. nov., Culicoides selandicus sp. nov. and Culicoides kalix sp. nov. (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae).

Authors:  Søren Achim Nielsen; Michael Kristensen; Thomas Pape
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2015-11-26

3.  New and poorly known Palaearctic fungus gnats (Diptera, Sciaroidea).

Authors:  Jukka Salmela; Levente-Péter Kolcsár
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2017-03-06

4.  A DNA barcode library for 5,200 German flies and midges (Insecta: Diptera) and its implications for metabarcoding-based biomonitoring.

Authors:  Jérôme Morinière; Michael Balke; Dieter Doczkal; Matthias F Geiger; Laura A Hardulak; Gerhard Haszprunar; Axel Hausmann; Lars Hendrich; Ledis Regalado; Björn Rulik; Stefan Schmidt; Johann-Wolfgang Wägele; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 7.090

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.