Literature DB >> 26690691

Aortic Counterpulsation Therapy in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: Analysis of the TBRIDGE Registry.

Cristiano Guedes Bezerra1, Eduardo Leal Adam1, Mariana Lins Baptista1, Giuliano Serafino Ciambelli1, Liliane Kopel1, Claudia Bernoche1, Leonardo Nicolau Geisler Daud Lopes1, Milena Frota Macatrão-Costa1, Breno de Alencar Araripe Falcão1, Silvia Gelas Lage1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of aortic counterpulsation therapy in advanced heart failure is controversial.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hemodynamic and metabolic effects of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and its impact on 30-day mortality in patients with heart failure.
METHODS: Historical prospective, unicentric study to evaluate all patients treated with IABP between August/2008 and July/2013, included in an institutional registry named TBRIDGE (The Brazilian Registry of Intra-aortic balloon pump in Decompensated heart failure - Global Evaluation). We analyzed changes in oxygen central venous saturation (ScvO2), arterial lactate, and use of vasoactive drugs at 48 hours after IABP insertion. The 30-day mortality was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences in subgroups were evaluated by the Log-rank test.
RESULTS: A total of 223 patients (mean age 49 ± 14 years) were included. Mean left ventricle ejection fraction was 24 ± 10%, and 30% of patients had Chagas disease. Compared with pre-IABP insertion, we observed an increase in ScvO2 (50.5% vs. 65.5%, p < 0.001) and use of nitroprusside (33.6% vs. 47.5%, p < 0.001), and a decrease in lactate levels (31.4 vs. 16.7 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and use of vasopressors (36.3% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.003) after IABP insertion. Thirty-day survival was 69%, with lower mortality in Chagas disease patients compared without the disease (p = 0.008).
CONCLUSION: After 48 hours of use, IABP promoted changes in the use of vasoactive drugs, improved tissue perfusion. Chagas etiology was associated with lower 30-day mortality. Aortic counterpulsation therapy is an effective method of circulatory support for patients waiting for heart transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26690691      PMCID: PMC4728592          DOI: 10.5935/abc.20150147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol        ISSN: 0066-782X            Impact factor:   2.000


  14 in total

1.  1999 update: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary and Recommendations: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction).

Authors:  T J Ryan; E M Antman; N H Brooks; R M Califf; L D Hillis; L F Hiratzka; E Rapaport; B Riegel; R O Russell; E E Smith; W D Weaver; R J Gibbons; J S Alpert; K A Eagle; T J Gardner; A Garson; G Gregoratos; S C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm.

Authors:  Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Aortic counterpulsation: a review of the hemodynamic effects and indications for use.

Authors:  Richard A Santa-Cruz; Mauricio G Cohen; E Magnus Ohman
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  The use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation as an adjunct to reperfusion therapy in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  E R Bates; R J Stomel; J S Hochman; E M Ohman
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1998-05-29       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  The current practice of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation: results from the Benchmark Registry.

Authors:  J J Ferguson; M Cohen; R J Freedman; G W Stone; M F Miller; D L Joseph; E M Ohman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?

Authors:  T A Sanborn; L A Sleeper; E R Bates; A K Jacobs; J Boland; J K French; J Dens; V Dzavik; S T Palmeri; J G Webb; M Goldberger; J S Hochman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  The paradox of survival results after heart transplantation for cardiomyopathy caused by Trypanosoma cruzi. First Guidelines Group for Heart Transplantation of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  E A Bocchi; A Fiorelli
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  J S Hochman; L A Sleeper; J G Webb; T A Sanborn; H D White; J D Talley; C E Buller; A K Jacobs; J N Slater; J Col; S M McKinlay; T H LeJemtel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Contemporary utilization and outcomes of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction: the benchmark registry.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; E Magnus Ohman; Michael F Miller; Debra L Joseph; Jan T Christenson; Marc Cohen; Philip M Urban; Ramachandra C Reddy; Robert J Freedman; Karen L Staman; James J Ferguson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in US and non-US centres: results of the Benchmark Registry.

Authors:  Marc Cohen; Philip Urban; Jan T Christenson; Debra L Joseph; Robert J Freedman; Michael F Miller; E Magnus Ohman; Ramachandra C Reddy; Gregg W Stone; James J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Aditya Mandawat; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.546

2.  Predicting survival in patients with acute decompensated heart failure complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Nuccia Morici; Giovanna Viola; Laura Antolini; Gianfranco Alicandro; Michela Dal Martello; Alice Sacco; Maurizio Bottiroli; Federico Pappalardo; Luca Villanova; Laura De Ponti; Carlo La Vecchia; Maria Frigerio; Fabrizio Oliva; Justin Fried; Paolo Colombo; Arthur Reshad Garan
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 3.  Main Considerations of Cardiogenic Shock and Its Predictors: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maria Christiane Valeria Braga Braile-Sternieri; Eliana Migliorini Mustafa; Victor Rodrigues Ribeiro Ferreira; Sofia Braile Sabino; Giovanni Braile Sternieri; Lucia Angelica Buffulin de Faria; Bethina Canaroli Sbardellini; Cibele Olegario Vianna Queiroz; Domingo Marcolino Braile; Idiberto Jose Zotarelli Filho
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2018-04-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.