Literature DB >> 26690276

Selecting Processes to Minimize Hexavalent Chromium from Stainless Steel Welding: Eight welding processes/shielding gas combinations were assessed for generation of hexavalent chromium in stainless steel welding fumes.

M Keane1, A Siert2, S Stone1, B Chen1, J Slaven3, A Cumpston1, J Antonini1.   

Abstract

Eight welding processes/shielding gas combinations were assessed for generation of hexavalent chromium (Cr6+) in stainless steel welding fumes. The processes examined were gas metal arc welding (GMAW) (axial spray, short circuit, and pulsed spray modes), flux cored arc welding (FCAW), and shielded metal arc welding (SMAW). The Cr6+ fractions were measured in the fumes; fume generation rates, Cr6+ generation rates, and Cr6+ generation rates per unit mass of welding wire were determined. A limited controlled comparison study was done in a welding shop including SMAW, FCAW, and three GMAW methods. The processes studied were compared for costs, including relative labor costs. Results indicate the Cr6+ in the fume varied widely, from a low of 2800 to a high of 34,000 ppm. Generation rates of Cr6+ ranged from 69 to 7800 μg/min, and Cr6+ generation rates per unit of wire ranged from 1 to 270 μg/g. The results of field study were similar to the findings in the laboratory. The Cr6+ (ppm) in the fume did not necessarily correlate with the Cr6+ generation rate. Physical properties were similar for the processes, with mass median aerodynamic diameters ranging from 250 to 336 nm, while the FCAW and SMAW fumes were larger (360 and 670 nm, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The pulsed axial spray method was the best choice of the processes studied based on minimal fume generation, minimal Cr6+ generation, and cost per weld. This method is usable in any position, has a high metal deposition rate, and is relatively simple to learn and use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flux Cored Arc Welding (FCAW); Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW); Hexavalent Chromium; Shielded Metal Arc Welding (SMAW); Stainless Steel; Welding Fume

Year:  2012        PMID: 26690276      PMCID: PMC4681305     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Weld J        ISSN: 0043-2296            Impact factor:   1.833


  7 in total

1.  A field evaluation of the effect of pulsed arc welding technique on reducing worker exposures.

Authors:  M Wallace; D Landon; R Song; A Echt
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2001-02

2.  Control of exposure to hexavalent chromium and ozone in gas metal arc welding of stainless steels by use of a secondary shield gas.

Authors:  John H Dennis; Michael J French; Peter J Hewitt; Seyed B Mortazavi; Christopher A J Redding
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2002-01

3.  Fume generation and content of total chromium and hexavalent chromium in flux-cored arc welding.

Authors:  Chung Sik Yoon; Nam Won Paik; Jeong Han Kim
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2003-11

4.  Chromium, nickel and welding.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  1990

5.  Control of occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium and ozone in tubular wire arc-welding processes by replacement of potassium by lithium or by addition of zinc.

Authors:  John H Dennis; Michael J French; Peter J Hewitt; Seyed B Mortazavi; Christopher A J Redding
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2002-01

Review 6.  Health effects of welding.

Authors:  James M Antonini
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.635

7.  Hexavalent chromium content in stainless steel welding fumes is dependent on the welding process and shield gas type.

Authors:  Michael Keane; Samuel Stone; Bean Chen; James Slaven; Diane Schwegler-Berry; James Antonini
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2008-12-18
  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Profiling mild steel welding processes to reduce fume emissions and costs in the workplace.

Authors:  Michael J Keane; Arlen Siert; Bean T Chen; Samuel G Stone
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-02-10

2.  Profiling stainless steel welding processes to reduce fume emissions, hexavalent chromium emissions and operating costs in the workplace.

Authors:  Michael Keane; Arlen Siert; Samuel Stone; Bean T Chen
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Long-term metal fume exposure assessment of workers in a shipbuilding factory.

Authors:  Ying-Fang Wang; Yu-Chieh Kuo; Lin-Chi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Respiratory Exposure to Toxic Gases and Metal Fumes Produced by Welding Processes and Pulmonary Function Tests.

Authors:  Younes Mehrifar; Zahra Zamanian; Hamideh Pirami
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.