Literature DB >> 14602674

Fume generation and content of total chromium and hexavalent chromium in flux-cored arc welding.

Chung Sik Yoon1, Nam Won Paik, Jeong Han Kim.   

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the fume generation rates (FGRs) and the concentrations of total chromium and hexavalent chromium when stainless steel was welded using flux-cored arc welding (FCAW) with CO2 gas. FGRs and concentrations of total chromium and hexavalent chromium were quantified using a method recommended by the American Welding Society, inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (NIOSH Method 7300) and ion chromatography (modified NIOSH Method 7604), respectively. The amount of total fume generated was significantly related to the level of input power. The ranges of FGR were 189-344, 389-698 and 682-1157 mg/min at low, optimal and high input power, respectively. It was found that the FGRs increased with input power by an exponent of 1.19, and increased with current by an exponent of 1.75. The ranges of total chromium fume generation rate (FGRCr) were 3.83-8.27, 12.75-37.25 and 38.79-76.46 mg/min at low, optimal and high input power, respectively. The ranges of hexavalent chromium fume generation rate (FGRCr6+) were 0.46-2.89, 0.76-6.28 and 1.70-11.21 mg/min at low, optimal and high input power, respectively. Thus, hexavalent chromium, which is known to be a carcinogen, generated 1.9 (1.0-2.7) times and 3.7 (2.4-5.0) times as the input power increased from low to optimal and low to high, respectively. As a function of input power, the concentration of total chromium in the fume increased from 1.57-2.65 to 5.45-8.13% while the concentration of hexavalent chromium ranged from 0.15 to 1.08%. The soluble fraction of hexavalent chromium produced by FCAW was approximately 80-90% of total hexavalent chromium. The concentration of total chromium and the solubility of hexavalent chromium were similar to those reported from other studies of shielded metal arc welding fumes, and the concentration of hexavalent chromium was similar to that obtained for metal inert gas-welding fumes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14602674     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meg063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  9 in total

1.  Reduction of Biomechanical and Welding Fume Exposures in Stud Welding.

Authors:  Nathan B Fethke; Thomas M Peters; Stephanie Leonard; Mahmoud Metwali; Imali A Mudunkotuwa
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-11-23

Review 2.  Estimation of particulate mass and manganese exposure levels among welders.

Authors:  Angela Hobson; Noah Seixas; David Sterling; Brad A Racette
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-09-24

3.  Selecting Processes to Minimize Hexavalent Chromium from Stainless Steel Welding: Eight welding processes/shielding gas combinations were assessed for generation of hexavalent chromium in stainless steel welding fumes.

Authors:  M Keane; A Siert; S Stone; B Chen; J Slaven; A Cumpston; J Antonini
Journal:  Weld J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.833

4.  Profiling stainless steel welding processes to reduce fume emissions, hexavalent chromium emissions and operating costs in the workplace.

Authors:  Michael Keane; Arlen Siert; Samuel Stone; Bean T Chen
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Size Distribution and Estimated Respiratory Deposition of Total Chromium, Hexavalent Chromium, Manganese, and Nickel in Gas Metal Arc Welding Fume Aerosols.

Authors:  Lorenzo G Cena; William P Chisholm; Michael J Keane; Amy Cumpston; Bean T Chen
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.908

6.  Evaluation of operational parameters role on the emission of fumes.

Authors:  Javad Sajedifar; Amir Hossein Kokabi; Somayeh Farhang Dehghan; Ahmad Mehri; Kamal Azam; Farideh Golbabaei
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.179

7.  Assessment of welders exposure to carcinogen metals from manual metal arc welding in gas transmission pipelines, iran.

Authors:  F Golbabaei; M Seyedsomea; A Ghahri; H Shirkhanloo; M Khadem; H Hassani; N Sadeghi; B Dinari
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 1.429

Review 8.  Extension of the Advanced REACH Tool (ART) to Include Welding Fume Exposure.

Authors:  Aduldatch Sailabaht; Fan Wang; John Cherrie
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Genotoxicity and inflammatory potential of stainless steel welding fume particles: an in vitro study on standard vs Cr(VI)-reduced flux-cored wires and the role of released metals.

Authors:  Sarah McCarrick; Valentin Romanovski; Zheng Wei; Elin M Westin; Kjell-Arne Persson; Klara Trydell; Richard Wagner; Inger Odnevall; Yolanda S Hedberg; Hanna L Karlsson
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.153

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.