| Literature DB >> 26689699 |
Pierre-Alexandre Just1,2,3,4,5, Alexis Poncy6, Sara Charawi1,2,3,4, Rajae Dahmani1,2,3,4, Massiré Traore1,2,3,4, Typhanie Dumontet1,2,3,4, Valérie Drouet1,2,3,4, Florent Dumont1,2,3, Hélène Gilgenkrantz1,2,3,4, Sabine Colnot1,2,3,4, Benoit Terris1,2,3,4,5, Cédric Coulouarn7, Frédéric Lemaigre6, Christine Perret1,2,3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: LKB1 is an evolutionary conserved kinase implicated in a wide range of cellular functions including inhibition of cell proliferation, regulation of cell polarity and metabolism. When Lkb1 is inactivated in the liver, glucose homeostasis is perturbed, cellular polarity is affected and cholestasis develops. Cholestasis occurs as a result from deficient bile duct development, yet how LKB1 impacts on biliary morphogenesis is unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26689699 PMCID: PMC4687046 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Phenotype of mice carrying Lkb1 deletion in the embryonic liver.
(A) LKBKOlivemb mouse model results in efficient inactivation of Lkb1 protein expression in the liver. Western blot analysis of Lkb1 and β-actin (loading control) of liver lysates from wild-type, control (LKB1fl,fl, Cre-) designed WT and mutant (LKB1fl,fl, Cre+) mice designed KO (2-week old mice). (B) Gross appearance of a control (WT) and mutant (KO) LKBKOlivemb mice at postnatal day 28. (C) Weight curves from birth to post-natal day 30 in the LKBKOlivemb model. Mice genotypes were determined at postnatal day 5. N = 15 control and 8 mutant mice. Error bars: standard deviations.* P<0.01, ** P<0.05, *** P<0.001. Deletion of Lkb1 in the embryonic liver causes postnatal growth retardation beginning at day 12. (D) Obstructive cholestasis in LKBKOlivemb mutant mice. Gross aspect of serum from a control (WT) and mutant (KO) LKBKOlivemb mice at postnatal day 15. Blood levels of conjugated bilirubin and ALAT in LKBKOlivemb control (WT) and mutant (KO) mice at postnatal day 15. n = 6 control and 4 mutant mice. Error bars: standard deviations. Statistical significance was evaluated using a two-sample unpaired Student’s t-test between KO and mutant animals. *** P<0.001.
Fig 2Lkb1 is required for canaliculi formation and intrahepatic bile ducts morphogenesis.
(A) Top panel: representative images of 3-week old control and mutant LKBKOlivemb mice liver sections stained with the apical marker aPKCζ. Note the elongated canalicular network and the tortuous dilated bile canaliculi in control and mutant animal, respectively. Bottom panel: representative images of 3-week old control and mutant LKBKOlivemb mice liver sections stained with the anti-CD10 antibody. Immunohistochemistry evidences a delicate canalicular network at the apical pole of the hepatocytes of control animal. In KO mice, the staining was lost. Top: low magnification, middle and bottom: high magnification. (B) Top panel: Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stained sections of 3-week old control and mutant LKBKOlivemb mouse liver. Middle and bottom panels: Cytokeratin 19 (CK19)-stained sections of 3-week old control and mutant LKBKOlivemb mouse livers. Note the well-formed and mature bile ducts in the control mouse and the numerous ductal plate-like structures around the portal tract in mutant mice. Top two panels: high magnification, bottom panel: scanning magnification.
Fig 3Lkb1 controls the maturation of bile duct during bile duct tubulogenesis.
(A) Immunofluorescence for Sox9, HNF4 and E-cadherin demonstrate that Lkb1 is required for the transition from an asymmetric primitive duct to a symmetric and mature bile duct in the developing liver. LKBKOlivemb (KO) embryos were sampled at E18.5 and liver sections were stained for the hepatoblast marker HNF4, and for the cholangiocyte markers Sox9. Note the symmetrical localization of Sox9 around the bile duct in control mice (Control) whereas Sox9 was only expressed in the portal layer of the asymmetric bile ducts in mutant embryos. High E-cadherin levels mark mature cholangiocytes. (B) Representative immunofluorescence for HNF1β and HNF6 in control and LKBKOlivemb livers in top and bottom panels respectively. Medium-high magnifications. (C) Notch-ICD and Hes-1 expression are restricted to the portal layer of asymmetrical bile duct in LKBKOlivemb mutant mice whereas Notch activation was evidenced in both layers of the biliary tubules in control animals. Medium magnification.
Fig 4Inactivation of Lkb1 and Notch in the liver share a common gene signature.
(A) RBPJKOlivemb and LKBKOlivemb models share a common gene expression signature. Upper part: Venn diagram of genes differentially expressed (p<0.001, fold change>1.5) between mutant and control mice in the LKBKOlivemb and RBPJKOlivemb (5-days old) models. Fifty-five genes were found to be deregulated in the two models. Lower part: Supervised hierarchical clustering analysis demonstrates that 54 (out of 55) common genes are similarly deregulated in the two models. (B) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) demonstrates that the Lkb1 and Notch pathways share a common transcriptional program. RBPJKOlivemb (upper part) and LKBKOlivemb (lower part) gene signatures were used for GSEA using the gene expression profiles of LKBKOlivemb (upper part) and RBPJKOlivemb (lower part) mice and their respective control (WT) counterparts. Up- and down-regulated genes in the RBPJKOlivemb signature were found to be specifically enriched in the gene expression profiles of LKBKOlivemb and control (WT) mice, respectively. Similarly, up- and down-regulated genes in the LKBKOlivemb signature were found to be specifically enriched in the gene expression profiles of RBPJKOlivemb and control (WT) mice, respectively. All gene sets were significantly enriched at nominal p-value<1%. (C) Most significantly altered functions revealed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). A dataset containing gene identifiers and corresponding values were uploaded to the Ingeniuty Pathway analysis software (IPA). The transcripts differentially expressed between KO and WT that met the cutoff criteria (FC > 1.5, p< 0.001) were considered for the analysis. Bars represent the logarithmic value of the significance level, the dashed line corresponds to the threshold of 0.05.
Fig 5Cross-talk between LKB1 and Notch signaling.
(A) The RBP-J luciferase reporter was transfected into Mz-Cha-1 cells either alone (0) or with increasing dose of NICD vector (ng) as indicated. (B) Silencing by 50 pmol -100 pmol of LKB1 siRNA (LKB) and scrambled siRNA (SC). LKB1 protein was revealed by western blot. β-actin was used as loading control. (C-D) LKB1 silencing led to decrease Notch activity. Luciferase activity was measured in the absence of siRNA (1), in the presence of either 50 pmol of LKB1 siRNA or scrambled siRNA (2) and the presence of 100 pmol of either LKB1 siRNA or scrambled siRNA (3). Transfections were done in Mz-ChA-1 cells (C) or in HUH7 cells (D). * P< 0.05. ** P<0.01. (E) LKB1 is required for full activation of Notch signaling in the developing liver. RT-qPCR of different Notch positive target genes (Hey1, Heyl, Hes1 and Nrarp) in 8- and 14-day old control and mutant LKBKOlivemb mice. N = 3–4 per group. Error bars: SEM. F: Notch negatively regulates LKB1 level measured by western blot analysis and the phosphorylation level of AMPK (pAMPK-T172). Statistical significance was evaluated using a two-sample unpaired Student’s t-test between KO and WT. * P< 0.05. ** P<0.01.