| Literature DB >> 26689521 |
Chen Jen Chan1, Victor Srougi1, Fabio Yoshiaki Tanno1, Ricardo Duarte Jordão1, Miguel Srougi1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficiency of a novel device coupled with ultrassound for renal percutaneous puncture.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26689521 PMCID: PMC4756972 DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Braz J Urol ISSN: 1677-5538 Impact factor: 1.541
Figure 1vertices of the initial right triangle: the target calyx (c); the “apex” of ultrasound transducer in contact with the skin, perpendicular to the aimed calyx (s); and the orthogonal projection of the center of the protractor in the skin plane (E').
Figure 2Formation of the right triangle. S'C: Distance from the target calyx (C) to its orthogonal projection on the plane of the center of the protractor (S'). S'E: Distance between point S' and the center of the protractor (E). CE: Distance from the target calyx (C) to the center of the protractor (E). D: Distance between the planes.
Results of the puncture procedures in the punctiometer and no punctiometer groups.
| Punctiometer | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| With | Without | ||
| Calyxes with a successful 1st puncture | 25 (83%) | 13 (43%) | 0.011 |
| Calyxes with a precision index rating of 2 | 21 (72%) | 13 (52%) | 0.028 |
| Time for three punctures in each kidney (min) | 14.42±7.39 | 22.37±7.21 | 0.025 |
| Kidneys with 1-point complications | 10 (100%) | 8 (80%) | 0.224 |
Data are mean±standard deviation or number (percentage)
Figure 3Comparison of frequencies and means between the Punctiometer and no Punctiometer groups: A) Precision index; B) number of puncture attempts required; C) mean time required to perform three punctures in each kidney; D) grade of complications (which were all hematomas).
Figure 4Ilustration of the punctiometer in use.