Elena R Schroeter1, Timothy P Cleland2. 1. Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 12182, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Much credence has been given in the paleoproteomic community to glutamine deamidation as a proxy for the age of proteins derived from fossil and subfossil material, and this modification has been invoked as a means for determining the endogeneity of molecules recovered from very old fossil specimens. METHODS: We re-evaluated the relationship between glutamine deamidation and geologic time by examining previously published data from five recent mass spectrometry studies of archeaological fossils. Deamidation values recovered for fossils were graphed against their reported chronologic age using WebPlotDigitizer. RESULTS: The experimental data that has been produced from fossil material to date show that the extent of glutamine deamidation does not correspond to the absolute age of the specimens being examined, but rather show extreme variation between specimens of similar age and taxonomic affinity. CONCLUSIONS: Because deamidation rates and levels can be greatly affected by numerous chemical and environmental factors, we propose that glutamine deamidation is better suited as an indicator of preservational quality and/or environmental conditions than a mark of the endogeneity or authenticity of ancient proteins.
RATIONALE: Much credence has been given in the paleoproteomic community to glutamine deamidation as a proxy for the age of proteins derived from fossil and subfossil material, and this modification has been invoked as a means for determining the endogeneity of molecules recovered from very old fossil specimens. METHODS: We re-evaluated the relationship between glutamine deamidation and geologic time by examining previously published data from five recent mass spectrometry studies of archeaological fossils. Deamidation values recovered for fossils were graphed against their reported chronologic age using WebPlotDigitizer. RESULTS: The experimental data that has been produced from fossil material to date show that the extent of glutamine deamidation does not correspond to the absolute age of the specimens being examined, but rather show extreme variation between specimens of similar age and taxonomic affinity. CONCLUSIONS: Because deamidation rates and levels can be greatly affected by numerous chemical and environmental factors, we propose that glutamine deamidation is better suited as an indicator of preservational quality and/or environmental conditions than a mark of the endogeneity or authenticity of ancient proteins.
Authors: Elena R Schroeter; Caroline J DeHart; Timothy P Cleland; Wenxia Zheng; Paul M Thomas; Neil L Kelleher; Marshall Bern; Mary H Schweitzer Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Timothy P Cleland; Elena R Schroeter; Leonid Zamdborg; Wenxia Zheng; Ji Eun Lee; John C Tran; Marshall Bern; Michael B Duncan; Valerie S Lebleu; Dorothy R Ahlf; Paul M Thomas; Raghu Kalluri; Neil L Kelleher; Mary H Schweitzer Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Rikai Sawafuji; Enrico Cappellini; Tomohito Nagaoka; Anna K Fotakis; Rosa Rakownikow Jersie-Christensen; Jesper V Olsen; Kazuaki Hirata; Shintaroh Ueda Journal: R Soc Open Sci Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 2.963
Authors: Shevan Wilkin; Alicia Ventresca Miller; William T T Taylor; Bryan K Miller; Richard W Hagan; Madeleine Bleasdale; Ashley Scott; Sumiya Gankhuyg; Abigail Ramsøe; S Uliziibayar; Christian Trachsel; Paolo Nanni; Jonas Grossmann; Ludovic Orlando; Mark Horton; Philipp W Stockhammer; Erdene Myagmar; Nicole Boivin; Christina Warinner; Jessica Hendy Journal: Nat Ecol Evol Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 15.460
Authors: Michael Buckley; Stacey Warwood; Bart van Dongen; Andrew C Kitchener; Phillip L Manning Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 5.349