| Literature DB >> 26688797 |
M Khadem Abolfazli1, S R Mahdavi2, Gh Ataei3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gold nanoparticles are emerging as promising agents for cancer therapy and are being investigated as drug carriers, photothermal agents, contrast agents and radiosensitisers.Entities:
Keywords: Dose Enhancement; Gold Nanoparticle; MCNPX Code; Megavoltage Radiotherapy
Year: 2015 PMID: 26688797 PMCID: PMC4681463
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Phys Eng ISSN: 2251-7200
Figure 1Schematic Diagrams of Monte Carlo Simulation Geometry
Figure 2Energy Spectra of Beams Used to Irradiate Nanoparticles for Monte Carlo Simulation. Beams are(a) Cobalt-60 (b) 6 MV.
Figure 3Absorb Dose in Water as Function of Distance away from the Center of Gold Nanoparticle. Data for Beams (a) 6 MV and (b) Cobalt-60.
Results are compared to the case when gold is absent (substituted by water). The calculated dose in this table excludes deposition within nanoparticles volume.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Mean electron Energy(Kev) | 30 | 420 ±10 | 680 ± 60 | 370 ± 9 | 1200 ± 100 |
| 50 | 454± 9 | 720 ± 40 | 386 ± 7 | 1150 ± 70 | |
| Total relative dose outside nanoparticles | 30 | 4.31 ± 0.01×10-2 | 1.36 ± 0.01×10-2 | 3.00 ± 0.01×10-3 | 1.17 ± 0.01×10-3 |
| 50 | 1.005 ± 0.002×10-1 | 2.93 ±0.01×10-2 | 1.088 ± 0.002×10-2 | 1.50 ±0.01×10-3 | |