Literature DB >> 26688263

Characterisation of nanoplastics during the degradation of polystyrene.

Scott Lambert1, Martin Wagner2.   

Abstract

The release of plastics into the environment has been identified as an important issue for some time. Recent publications have suggested that the degradation of plastic materials will result in the release of nano-sized plastic particles to the environment. Nanoparticle tracking analysis was applied to characterise the formation of nanoplastics during the degradation of a polystyrene (PS) disposable coffee cup lid. The results clearly show an increase in the formation of nanoplastics over time. After 56 days' exposure the concentration of nanoplastics in the PS sample was 1.26 × 10(8) particles/ml (average particles size 224 nm) compared to 0.41 × 10(8) particles/ml in the control.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degradation; Environment; Microplastics; Nanoparticle tracking analysis; Nanoplastics; Polystyrene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26688263      PMCID: PMC5250697          DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


Introduction

The release of plastic materials into the environment is recognised as an important pollution related issue (Sutherland et al., 2010, UNEP, 2011). Once in the environment plastics undergo abiotic and biotic weathering processes that cause their degradation and fragmentation into increasingly smaller particles, commonly termed microplastics (MPs; often defined as fragments <5 mm). A number of environmental monitoring studies have quantified the environmental occurrence of MPs in surface waters (Faure et al., 2015), coastal sediments (Browne et al., 2011), beach sands (Liebezeit and Dubaish, 2012), freshwater sediments (Castañeda et al., 2014), and deep-sea environments (Woodall et al., 2014). MPs are also known to effectively sorb organic pollutants from surrounding water (Mato et al., 2001, Endo et al., 2005, Van et al., 2012). Therefore, internalized MPs might not only lead to direct physical injury, but also to a chemical exposure of the organism through the ingestion of pollutant loaded MPs (Ryan et al., 1988, Saal et al., 2008). Recent publications have also suggested that MPs will subsequently degrade into nano-sized plastic particles (see Andrady, 2011, Lambert et al., 2013, Mattsson et al., 2015). The environmental impacts of nanoplastics will be different to those presented by microplastics, because of their smaller size makes tissue penetration and accumulation in organs a possibility (Mattsson et al., 2015). This is a potentially important issue given the current concerns regarding the environmental behaviour and ecotoxicity of engineered nano-materials (Lambert et al., 2014). Therefore, the aim of this work was to test the hypothesis that nanoplastic particles are formed during plastic degradation processes and that the concentrations will increase over time.

Methods

To investigate the potential formation of nanoplastics a time course study was performed using a polystyrene (PS) disposable coffee cup lid. The PS sample was cut into 1 cm squares (using scissors), placed in glass vials, immersed in 20 ml demineralized water, and placed in a weathering chamber (Binder GmbH). The exposure conditions were kept static with the temperature set to 30 °C and 24 h exposure to light in both the visible and ultra-violet (UV; 320–400 nm) range. Samples were taken after 7, 14, 28 and 56 days, for each time point individual samples were established in triplicate alongside control samples (i.e. water only). A laboratory blank was also created on the day of each sample collection to document any contamination that may result from the analytical process. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was used to determine the particle size distribution in the liquid samples. NTA is capable of analysing particles in the size range of 30–2000 nm. Analysis was performed using NanoSight LM 10 (NanoSight Ltd, Wiltshire, UK). To characterise each individual replicate PS sample, control, and blank in a representative manner three video images of each were taken. Video image length was set at 30 s and imaging was performed at room temperature. The video images were then processed using NTA 2.3 software, with the following parameters; detention threshold set to auto; blur set to 5 × 5; minimum track length and minimum expected particle size were both set to auto.

Results and discussion

In this study the formation of nanoplastic particles was measured during the degradation of a disposable PS coffee cup lid. NTA allows individual particles to be analysed in liquid samples and its application on heterogeneous samples has previously been demonstrated (Filipe et al., 2010, Montes-Burgos et al., 2010, La Rocca et al., 2014). Fig. 1 shows an increase in the formation of nanoplastics over time and after 14 days a difference is observed between the PS samples (0.32 × 108 particles/ml) and the corresponding control sample (0.04 × 108 particles/ml). At day 56 the particle concentration in the PS solutions was 1.26 × 108 particles/ml compared to 0.41 × 108 particles/ml in the control. Weight loss of the PS samples up until day 56 was negligible. As observed by La Rocca et al. (2014) the main disadvantage of NTA is that it does not provide images of the visualized particles, and the structure of the particles cannot be evaluated. However, the SEM images depict bubbling on the PS material surface. This suggests that the degradation process begins with a steady process of surface erosion leading to the continuous release of nanoplastics into the surrounding solution.
Fig. 1

Measured particle concentrations in the blank, control, and polystyrene samples. Particle concentrations were calculated by the NTA software and the ±values represent the standard error associated with the measurement, with scanning electron microscope images for sample taken at day 0 and 14. Further details are provided as supporting information.

The increase in the formation of nanoplastics is further demonstrated by the particle size distributions (Fig. 2). The blank samples are used to represent background concentrations, while the control samples are used to define any naturally occurring particles that may enter the samples during the exposure period (e.g. atmospheric dust). The NanoSight platform also allows for the calculation of particle volume distribution (Fig. 3). As particle abundance increases exponentially with decreasing particle size (Fig. 2), this function can be used to represent the presence of larger particles and demonstrates the formation of particles up to 2000 nm. Particle size is an important property in determining the interaction of nano-particles with living systems (Montes-Burgos et al., 2010). A study by Browne et al. (2008) using the mussel Mytilus edulis indicated that small microspheres (3.0 μm) can be translocated from the gut to the circulatory system within 3 days and then persist in circulation for over 48 days. The short-term exposure used in this study did not find any significant biological effects (Browne et al., 2008). However, environmental exposure will occur over a longer time period and the formation of plastic particles below this size range during plastic degradation is highly likely.
Fig. 2

Size distribution data of particles formed during the degradation of a polystyrene coffee cup lid measured by nanoparticle tracking analysis.

Fig. 3

Volume concentration of particles formed during the degradation of a polystyrene coffee cup lid measured by nanoparticle tracking analysis.

Conclusion

The aim of this work was to test the hypothesis that nanoplastics are formed during the degradation of a disposable PS coffee cup lid. The findings show that nanoplastics are formed during the degradation process of plastic materials, and that their increase in concentration over time is measurable. This work is part of a larger ongoing study that aims to assess potential differences in particle formation between polymer types, and the extent to which microbial communities can utilise particles in this size range.
  15 in total

1.  Microplastics in beaches of the East Frisian islands Spiekeroog and Kachelotplate.

Authors:  Gerd Liebezeit; Fatehi Dubaish
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L).

Authors:  Mark A Browne; Awantha Dissanayake; Tamara S Galloway; David M Lowe; Richard C Thompson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2010.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Mick Clout; Isabelle M Côté; Peter Daszak; Michael H Depledge; Liz Fellman; Erica Fleishman; Rachel Garthwaite; David W Gibbons; Jennifer De Lurio; Andrew J Impey; Fiona Lickorish; David Lindenmayer; Jane Madgwick; Ceri Margerison; Trevor Maynard; Lloyd S Peck; Jules Pretty; Stephanie Prior; Kent H Redford; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Mark Spalding; Andrew R Watkinson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  An evaluation of surface micro- and mesoplastic pollution in pelagic ecosystems of the Western Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  Florian Faure; Camille Saini; Gaël Potter; François Galgani; Luiz Felippe de Alencastro; Pascal Hagmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Effects of environmental conditions on latex degradation in aquatic systems.

Authors:  Scott Lambert; Chris J Sinclair; Emma L Bradley; Alistair B A Boxall
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Critical evaluation of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the measurement of nanoparticles and protein aggregates.

Authors:  Vasco Filipe; Andrea Hawe; Wim Jiskoot
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Occurrence, degradation, and effect of polymer-based materials in the environment.

Authors:  Scott Lambert; Chris Sinclair; Alistair Boxall
Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 7.563

8.  Concentration of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in beached resin pellets: variability among individual particles and regional differences.

Authors:  Satoshi Endo; Reiko Takizawa; Keiji Okuda; Hideshige Takada; Kazuhiro Chiba; Haruyuki Kanehiro; Haruo Ogi; Rei Yamashita; Takeshi Date
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.553

9.  Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines woldwide: sources and sinks.

Authors:  Mark Anthony Browne; Phillip Crump; Stewart J Niven; Emma Teuten; Andrew Tonkin; Tamara Galloway; Richard Thompson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris.

Authors:  Lucy C Woodall; Anna Sanchez-Vidal; Miquel Canals; Gordon L J Paterson; Rachel Coppock; Victoria Sleight; Antonio Calafat; Alex D Rogers; Bhavani E Narayanaswamy; Richard C Thompson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  48 in total

1.  Ecotoxicity of polyethylene nanoplastics from the North Atlantic oceanic gyre on freshwater and marine organisms (microalgae and filter-feeding bivalves).

Authors:  Magalie Baudrimont; Adeline Arini; Claire Guégan; Zélie Venel; Julien Gigault; Boris Pedrono; Jonathan Prunier; Laurence Maurice; Alexandra Ter Halle; Agnès Feurtet-Mazel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  In-house validation of AF4-MALS-UV for polystyrene nanoplastic analysis.

Authors:  Beatrice Battistini; Francesco Petrucci; Beatrice Bocca
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Microplastics: A Review of Methodology for Sampling and Characterizing Environmental and Biological Samples.

Authors:  Christiana H Shoopman; Xiaoping Pan
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Sources, transport, measurement and impact of nano and microplastics in urban watersheds.

Authors:  Quinn T Birch; Phillip M Potter; Patricio X Pinto; Dionysios D Dionysiou; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 8.044

5.  A review of methods for measuring microplastics in aquatic environments.

Authors:  Lei Mai; Lian-Jun Bao; Lei Shi; Charles S Wong; Eddy Y Zeng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Detection of polystyrene nanoplastics in biological samples based on the solvatochromic properties of Nile red: application in Hydra attenuata exposed to nanoplastics.

Authors:  François Gagné; Joëlle Auclair; Brian Quinn
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Detection, biophysical effects, and toxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles to the cnidarian Hydra attenuata.

Authors:  Joëlle Auclair; Brian Quinn; Caroline Peyrot; Kevin James Wilkinson; François Gagné
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Thyroid endocrine status and biochemical stress responses in adult male Wistar rats chronically exposed to pristine polystyrene nanoplastics.

Authors:  Fatemeh Amereh; Akbar Eslami; Simin Fazelipour; Mohammad Rafiee; Mohammad Ismail Zibaii; Mohammad Babaei
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 3.524

9.  Environmental effects of ozone depletion and its interactions with climate change: Progress report, 2016.

Authors: 
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Uncovering the release of micro/nanoplastics from disposable face masks at times of COVID-19.

Authors:  Silvia Morgana; Barbara Casentini; Stefano Amalfitano
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 10.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.