Sandra M Coulon1, Dawn K Wilson2, M L Van Horn3, Gregory A Hand4, Stephen Kresovich5. 1. Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Barnwell College, Columbia, SC, 29201, USA. coulon@mailbox.sc.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Barnwell College, Columbia, SC, 29201, USA. 3. Educational Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA. 4. School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. 5. Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: African-American adults are disproportionately affected by stress-related chronic conditions like high blood pressure (BP), and both environmental stress and genetic risk may play a role in its development. PURPOSE: This study tested whether the dual risk of low neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and glucocorticoid genetic sensitivity interacted to predict waking cortisol and BP. METHODS: Cross-sectional waking cortisol and BP were collected from 208 African-American adults who were participating in a follow-up visit as part of the Positive Action for Today's Health trial. Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped, salivary cortisol samples were collected, and neighborhood SES was calculated using 2010 Census data. RESULTS: The sample was mostly female (65 %), with weight classified as overweight or obese (M BMI = 32.74, SD = 8.88) and a mean age of 55.64 (SD = 15.21). The gene-by-neighborhood SES interaction predicted cortisol (B = 0.235, p = .001, r (2) = .036), but not BP. For adults with high genetic sensitivity, waking cortisol was lower with lower SES but higher with higher SES (B = 0.87). Lower neighborhood SES was also related to higher systolic BP (B = -0.794, p = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrated an interaction whereby African-American adults with high genetic sensitivity had high levels of waking cortisol with higher neighborhood SES, and low levels with lower neighborhood SES. This moderation effect is consistent with a differential susceptibility gene-environment pattern, rather than a dual-risk pattern. These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence that demonstrates the importance of investigating complex gene-environment relations in order to better understand stress-related health disparities.
BACKGROUND: African-American adults are disproportionately affected by stress-related chronic conditions like high blood pressure (BP), and both environmental stress and genetic risk may play a role in its development. PURPOSE: This study tested whether the dual risk of low neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and glucocorticoid genetic sensitivity interacted to predict waking cortisol and BP. METHODS: Cross-sectional waking cortisol and BP were collected from 208 African-American adults who were participating in a follow-up visit as part of the Positive Action for Today's Health trial. Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped, salivary cortisol samples were collected, and neighborhood SES was calculated using 2010 Census data. RESULTS: The sample was mostly female (65 %), with weight classified as overweight or obese (M BMI = 32.74, SD = 8.88) and a mean age of 55.64 (SD = 15.21). The gene-by-neighborhood SES interaction predicted cortisol (B = 0.235, p = .001, r (2) = .036), but not BP. For adults with high genetic sensitivity, waking cortisol was lower with lower SES but higher with higher SES (B = 0.87). Lower neighborhood SES was also related to higher systolic BP (B = -0.794, p = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrated an interaction whereby African-American adults with high genetic sensitivity had high levels of waking cortisol with higher neighborhood SES, and low levels with lower neighborhood SES. This moderation effect is consistent with a differential susceptibility gene-environment pattern, rather than a dual-risk pattern. These findings contribute to a growing body of evidence that demonstrates the importance of investigating complex gene-environment relations in order to better understand stress-related health disparities.
Entities:
Keywords:
African American; Blood pressure; Cortisol; Genetic; Neighborhood; Socioeconomic status
Authors: A V Diez-Roux; C I Kiefe; D R Jacobs; M Haan; S A Jackson; F J Nieto; C C Paton; R Schulz; A V Roux Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Alexander P Reiner; Elad Ziv; Denise L Lind; Caroline M Nievergelt; Nicholas J Schork; Steven R Cummings; Angie Phong; Esteban González Burchard; Tamara B Harris; Bruce M Psaty; Pui-Yan Kwok Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2005-01-19 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Karen L Petersen; Maria E Bleil; Jeanne McCaffery; Rachel H Mackey; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Matthew F Muldoon; Stephen B Manuck Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Fleur P Velders; Gwen Dieleman; Rolieke A M Cents; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Albert Hofman; Marinus H Van Ijzendoorn; Frank C Verhulst; Henning Tiemeier Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Deborah E Polk; Sheldon Cohen; William J Doyle; David P Skoner; Clemens Kirschbaum Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Daniel A Hackman; Laura M Betancourt; Nancy L Brodsky; Hallam Hurt; Martha J Farah Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Jennifer A Smith; Wei Zhao; Kalyn Yasutake; Carmella August; Scott M Ratliff; Jessica D Faul; Eric Boerwinkle; Aravinda Chakravarti; Ana V Diez Roux; Yan Gao; Michael E Griswold; Gerardo Heiss; Sharon L R Kardia; Alanna C Morrison; Solomon K Musani; Stanford Mwasongwe; Kari E North; Kathryn M Rose; Mario Sims; Yan V Sun; David R Weir; Belinda L Needham Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Bridget Basile Ibrahim; Veronica Barcelona; Eileen M Condon; Cindy A Crusto; Jacquelyn Y Taylor Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2021 Set/Oct 01 Impact factor: 2.364