Tetsuya Hara1, Giovanni J Ughi2, Jason R McCarthy3, S Sibel Erdem3, Adam Mauskapf1, Samantha C Lyon2, Ali M Fard2, Elazer R Edelman4, Guillermo J Tearney5, Farouc A Jaffer6. 1. Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Center for System Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 5. Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA fjaffer@mgh.harvard.edu gtearney@mgh.harvard.edu. 6. Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA fjaffer@mgh.harvard.edu gtearney@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
AIMS: Fibrin deposition and absent endothelium characterize unhealed stents that are at heightened risk of stent thrombosis. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is increasingly used for assessing stent tissue coverage as a measure of healed stents, but cannot precisely identify whether overlying tissue represents physiological neointima. Here we assessed and compared fibrin deposition and persistence on bare metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) using near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) molecular imaging in vivo, in combination with simultaneous OCT stent coverage. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rabbits underwent implantation of one BMS and one DES without overlap in the infrarenal aorta (N = 20 3.5 × 12 mm). At Days 7 and/or 28, intravascular NIRF-OCT was performed following the injection of fibrin-targeted NIRF molecular imaging agent FTP11-CyAm7. Intravascular NIRF-OCT enabled high-resolution imaging of fibrin overlying stent struts in vivo, as validated by histopathology. Compared with BMS, DES showed greater fibrin deposition and fibrin persistence at Days 7 and 28 (P < 0.01 vs. BMS). Notably, for edge stent struts identified as covered by OCT on Day 7, 92.8 ± 9.5% of DES and 55.8 ± 23.6% of BMS struts were NIRF fibrin positive (P < 0.001). At Day 28, 18.6 ± 10.6% (DES) and 5.1 ± 8.7% (BMS) of OCT-covered struts remained fibrin positive (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intravascular NIRF fibrin molecular imaging improves the detection of unhealed stents, using clinically translatable technology that complements OCT. A sizeable percentage of struts deemed covered by OCT are actually covered by fibrin, particularly in DES, and therefore such stents might remain prothrombotic. These findings have implications for the specificity of standalone clinical OCT assessments of stent healing. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Fibrin deposition and absent endothelium characterize unhealed stents that are at heightened risk of stent thrombosis. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is increasingly used for assessing stent tissue coverage as a measure of healed stents, but cannot precisely identify whether overlying tissue represents physiological neointima. Here we assessed and compared fibrin deposition and persistence on bare metal stent (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) using near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) molecular imaging in vivo, in combination with simultaneous OCT stent coverage. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rabbits underwent implantation of one BMS and one DES without overlap in the infrarenal aorta (N = 20 3.5 × 12 mm). At Days 7 and/or 28, intravascular NIRF-OCT was performed following the injection of fibrin-targeted NIRF molecular imaging agent FTP11-CyAm7. Intravascular NIRF-OCT enabled high-resolution imaging of fibrin overlying stent struts in vivo, as validated by histopathology. Compared with BMS, DES showed greater fibrin deposition and fibrin persistence at Days 7 and 28 (P < 0.01 vs. BMS). Notably, for edge stent struts identified as covered by OCT on Day 7, 92.8 ± 9.5% of DES and 55.8 ± 23.6% of BMS struts were NIRF fibrin positive (P < 0.001). At Day 28, 18.6 ± 10.6% (DES) and 5.1 ± 8.7% (BMS) of OCT-covered struts remained fibrin positive (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intravascular NIRF fibrin molecular imaging improves the detection of unhealed stents, using clinically translatable technology that complements OCT. A sizeable percentage of struts deemed covered by OCT are actually covered by fibrin, particularly in DES, and therefore such stents might remain prothrombotic. These findings have implications for the specificity of standalone clinical OCT assessments of stent healing. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Laura Mauri; Dean J Kereiakes; Robert W Yeh; Priscilla Driscoll-Shempp; Donald E Cutlip; P Gabriel Steg; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Eugene Braunwald; Stephen D Wiviott; David J Cohen; David R Holmes; Mitchell W Krucoff; James Hermiller; Harold L Dauerman; Daniel I Simon; David E Kandzari; Kirk N Garratt; David P Lee; Thomas K Pow; Peter Ver Lee; Michael J Rinaldi; Joseph M Massaro Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael Joner; Aloke V Finn; Andrew Farb; Erik K Mont; Frank D Kolodgie; Elena Ladich; Robert Kutys; Kristi Skorija; Herman K Gold; Renu Virmani Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-05-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bimmer E Claessen; José P S Henriques; Farouc A Jaffer; Roxana Mehran; Jan J Piek; George D Dangas Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Josef Vymazal; Elmar Spuentrup; Gerardo Cardenas-Molina; Andrea J Wiethoff; Michael G Hartmann; Peter Caravan; Edward C Parsons Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Hongki Yoo; Jin Won Kim; Milen Shishkov; Eman Namati; Theodore Morse; Roman Shubochkin; Jason R McCarthy; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Brett E Bouma; Farouc A Jaffer; Guillermo J Tearney Journal: Nat Med Date: 2011-11-06 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Ashley F Stein-Merlob; Tetsuya Hara; Jason R McCarthy; Adam Mauskapf; James A Hamilton; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Peter Libby; Farouc A Jaffer Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Peter Caravan; Ilknur Ay; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Himashinie Diyabalanage; Ian A Ramsay; Nicholas J Rotile; Adam Mauskapf; Ji-Kyung Choi; Thomas Witzel; Valerie Humblet; Farouc A Jaffer; Anna-Liisa Brownell; Ahmed Tawakol; Ciprian Catana; Mark F Conrad Journal: Stroke Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Milou E Noltes; Gooitzen M van Dam; Wouter B Nagengast; Pieter J van der Zaag; Riemer H J A Slart; Wiktor Szymanski; Schelto Kruijff; Rudi A J O Dierckx Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jie Cui; Chase W Kessinger; Harkamal S Jhajj; Madeleine S Grau; Sanjay Misra; Peter Libby; Jason R McCarthy; Farouc A Jaffer Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Christos V Bourantas; Farouc A Jaffer; Frank J Gijsen; Gijs van Soest; Sean P Madden; Brian K Courtney; Ali M Fard; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Yaping Zeng; Antonius F W van der Steen; Stanislav Emelianov; James Muller; Peter H Stone; Laura Marcu; Guillermo J Tearney; Patrick W Serruys Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Dmitry Bozhko; Eric A Osborn; Amir Rosenthal; Johan W Verjans; Tetsuya Hara; Stephan Kellnberger; Georg Wissmeyer; Saak V Ovsepian; Jason R McCarthy; Adam Mauskapf; Ashley F Stein; Farouc A Jaffer; Vasilis Ntziachristos Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Mazen S Albaghdadi; Ryutaro Ikegami; Mohamad B Kassab; Joseph A Gardecki; Mie Kunio; Mohammed M Chowdhury; Ramzi Khamis; Peter Libby; Guillermo J Tearney; Farouc A Jaffer Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 10.514
Authors: Marc R Dweck; Mhairi K Doris; Manish Motwani; Philip D Adamson; Piotr Slomka; Damini Dey; Zahi A Fayad; David E Newby; Daniel Berman Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 32.419