Literature DB >> 26685068

The Constrained Maximal Expression Level Owing to Haploidy Shapes Gene Content on the Mammalian X Chromosome.

Laurence D Hurst1, Avazeh T Ghanbarian1, Alistair R R Forrest2, Lukasz Huminiecki3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

X chromosomes are unusual in many regards, not least of which is their nonrandom gene content. The causes of this bias are commonly discussed in the context of sexual antagonism and the avoidance of activity in the male germline. Here, we examine the notion that, at least in some taxa, functionally biased gene content may more profoundly be shaped by limits imposed on gene expression owing to haploid expression of the X chromosome. Notably, if the X, as in primates, is transcribed at rates comparable to the ancestral rate (per promoter) prior to the X chromosome formation, then the X is not a tolerable environment for genes with very high maximal net levels of expression, owing to transcriptional traffic jams. We test this hypothesis using The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) and data from the Functional Annotation of the Mammalian Genome (FANTOM5) project. As predicted, the maximal expression of human X-linked genes is much lower than that of genes on autosomes: on average, maximal expression is three times lower on the X chromosome than on autosomes. Similarly, autosome-to-X retroposition events are associated with lower maximal expression of retrogenes on the X than seen for X-to-autosome retrogenes on autosomes. Also as expected, X-linked genes have a lesser degree of increase in gene expression than autosomal ones (compared to the human/Chimpanzee common ancestor) if highly expressed, but not if lowly expressed. The traffic jam model also explains the known lower breadth of expression for genes on the X (and the Z of birds), as genes with broad expression are, on average, those with high maximal expression. As then further predicted, highly expressed tissue-specific genes are also rare on the X and broadly expressed genes on the X tend to be lowly expressed, both indicating that the trend is shaped by the maximal expression level not the breadth of expression per se. Importantly, a limit to the maximal expression level explains biased tissue of expression profiles of X-linked genes. Tissues whose tissue-specific genes are very highly expressed (e.g., secretory tissues, tissues abundant in structural proteins) are also tissues in which gene expression is relatively rare on the X chromosome. These trends cannot be fully accounted for in terms of alternative models of biased expression. In conclusion, the notion that it is hard for genes on the Therian X to be highly expressed, owing to transcriptional traffic jams, provides a simple yet robustly supported rationale of many peculiar features of X's gene content, gene expression, and evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26685068      PMCID: PMC4686125          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Biol        ISSN: 1544-9173            Impact factor:   8.029


  55 in total

1.  A gradient of silent substitution rate in the human pseudoautosomal region.

Authors:  Dmitry A Filatov
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies.

Authors:  Mark Pagel; Andrew Meade; Daniel Barker
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs.

Authors:  David Brawand; Magali Soumillon; Anamaria Necsulea; Philippe Julien; Gábor Csárdi; Patrick Harrigan; Manuela Weier; Angélica Liechti; Ayinuer Aximu-Petri; Martin Kircher; Frank W Albert; Ulrich Zeller; Philipp Khaitovich; Frank Grützner; Sven Bergmann; Rasmus Nielsen; Svante Pääbo; Henrik Kaessmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Evolution on the X chromosome: unusual patterns and processes.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Rapid evolution of outer egg membrane proteins in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup: a case of ecologically driven evolution of female reproductive traits.

Authors:  Santosh Jagadeeshan; Rama S Singh
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  Review: Sex chromosome evolution and the expression of sex-specific genes in the placenta.

Authors:  J A M Graves
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  Dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Authors:  B S Baker; M Gorman; I Marín
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  Extensive gene traffic on the mammalian X chromosome.

Authors:  J J Emerson; Henrik Kaessmann; Esther Betrán; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia.

Authors:  Stephen G Landt; Georgi K Marinov; Anshul Kundaje; Pouya Kheradpour; Florencia Pauli; Serafim Batzoglou; Bradley E Bernstein; Peter Bickel; James B Brown; Philip Cayting; Yiwen Chen; Gilberto DeSalvo; Charles Epstein; Katherine I Fisher-Aylor; Ghia Euskirchen; Mark Gerstein; Jason Gertz; Alexander J Hartemink; Michael M Hoffman; Vishwanath R Iyer; Youngsook L Jung; Subhradip Karmakar; Manolis Kellis; Peter V Kharchenko; Qunhua Li; Tao Liu; X Shirley Liu; Lijia Ma; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Richard M Myers; Peter J Park; Michael J Pazin; Marc D Perry; Debasish Raha; Timothy E Reddy; Joel Rozowsky; Noam Shoresh; Arend Sidow; Matthew Slattery; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Michael Y Tolstorukov; Kevin P White; Simon Xi; Peggy J Farnham; Jason D Lieb; Barbara J Wold; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Chromosomal gene movements reflect the recent origin and biology of therian sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Lukasz Potrzebowski; Nicolas Vinckenbosch; Ana Claudia Marques; Frédéric Chalmel; Bernard Jégou; Henrik Kaessmann
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  14 in total

1.  The Constrained Maximal Expression Level Owing to Haploidy Shapes Gene Content on the Mammalian X Chromosome.

Authors:  Laurence D Hurst; Avazeh T Ghanbarian; Alistair R R Forrest; Lukasz Huminiecki
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 2.  Sex Chromosomes Do It Differently.

Authors:  Lauren A Richardson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Regulation of the X Chromosome in the Germline and Soma of Drosophila melanogaster Males.

Authors:  Eliza Argyridou; John Parsch
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  The Evolution of Sex Chromosomes and Dosage Compensation in Plants.

Authors:  Aline Muyle; Rylan Shearn; Gabriel Ab Marais
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Evidence for Dosage Compensation in Coccinia grandis, a Plant with a Highly Heteromorphic XY System.

Authors:  Cécile Fruchard; Hélène Badouin; David Latrasse; Ravi S Devani; Aline Muyle; Bénédicte Rhoné; Susanne S Renner; Anjan K Banerjee; Abdelhafid Bendahmane; Gabriel A B Marais
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Modelling of the breadth of expression from promoter architectures identifies pro-housekeeping transcription factors.

Authors:  Lukasz Huminiecki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Magic roundabout is an endothelial-specific ohnolog of ROBO1 which neo-functionalized to an essential new role in angiogenesis.

Authors:  Lukasz Huminiecki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dosage Compensation throughout the Schistosoma mansoni Lifecycle: Specific Chromatin Landscape of the Z Chromosome.

Authors:  Marion A L Picard; Beatriz Vicoso; David Roquis; Ingo Bulla; Ronaldo C Augusto; Nathalie Arancibia; Christoph Grunau; Jérôme Boissier; Céline Cosseau
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Compensation of Dosage-Sensitive Genes on the Chicken Z Chromosome.

Authors:  Fabian Zimmer; Peter W Harrison; Christophe Dessimoz; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 10.  Evolution of Sex Chromosome Dosage Compensation in Animals: A Beautiful Theory, Undermined by Facts and Bedeviled by Details.

Authors:  Liuqi Gu; James R Walters
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.