OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the diagnostic and prognostic impact of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping and validate it against left ventricular biopsies. BACKGROUND: Extracellular volume (ECV) expansion is a key feature of heart failure. CMR T1 mapping has been developed as a noninvasive technique to estimate ECV; however, the diagnostic and prognostic impacts of this technique have not been well established. METHODS: A total of 473 consecutive patients referred for CMR (49.5% female, age 57.8 ± 17.1 years) without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, or Anderson-Fabry disease were studied. T1 mapping with the modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence was used for ECV calculation (CMR-ECV). For methodological validation, 36 patients also underwent left ventricular biopsy, and ECV was quantified by TissueFAXS analysis (TissueFAXS-ECV). To assess the prognostic value of CMR-ECV, its association with hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons or cardiac death was tested in a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: TissueFAXS-ECV was 26.3 ± 7.2% and was significantly correlated with CMR-ECV (r = 0.493, p = 0.002). Patients were followed up for 13.3 ± 9.0 months and divided into CMR-ECV tertiles for Kaplan-Meier analysis (tertiles were ≤ 25.7%, 25.8% to 28.5%, and ≥ 28.6%). Significantly higher event rates were observed in patients with higher CMR-ECV (log-rank p = 0.013). By multivariable Cox regression analysis, CMR-ECV was independently associated with outcome among imaging variables (p = 0.004) but not after adjustment for clinical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: CMR T1 mapping allows accurate noninvasive quantification of ECV and is independently associated with event-free survival among imaging parameters. Its prognostic value on top of established clinical risk factors warrants further investigation in long-term studies.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the diagnostic and prognostic impact of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping and validate it against left ventricular biopsies. BACKGROUND: Extracellular volume (ECV) expansion is a key feature of heart failure. CMR T1 mapping has been developed as a noninvasive technique to estimate ECV; however, the diagnostic and prognostic impacts of this technique have not been well established. METHODS: A total of 473 consecutive patients referred for CMR (49.5% female, age 57.8 ± 17.1 years) without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, or Anderson-Fabry disease were studied. T1 mapping with the modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence was used for ECV calculation (CMR-ECV). For methodological validation, 36 patients also underwent left ventricular biopsy, and ECV was quantified by TissueFAXS analysis (TissueFAXS-ECV). To assess the prognostic value of CMR-ECV, its association with hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons or cardiac death was tested in a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: TissueFAXS-ECV was 26.3 ± 7.2% and was significantly correlated with CMR-ECV (r = 0.493, p = 0.002). Patients were followed up for 13.3 ± 9.0 months and divided into CMR-ECV tertiles for Kaplan-Meier analysis (tertiles were ≤ 25.7%, 25.8% to 28.5%, and ≥ 28.6%). Significantly higher event rates were observed in patients with higher CMR-ECV (log-rank p = 0.013). By multivariable Cox regression analysis, CMR-ECV was independently associated with outcome among imaging variables (p = 0.004) but not after adjustment for clinical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: CMR T1 mapping allows accurate noninvasive quantification of ECV and is independently associated with event-free survival among imaging parameters. Its prognostic value on top of established clinical risk factors warrants further investigation in long-term studies.
Authors: Maxim Avanesov; Julia Münch; Julius Weinrich; Lennart Well; Dennis Säring; Christian Stehning; Enver Tahir; Sebastian Bohnen; Ulf K Radunski; Kai Muellerleile; Gerhard Adam; Monica Patten; Gunnar Lund Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Yuko Y Inoue; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Nathan Mewton; Gustavo J Volpe; Yoshiaki Ohyama; Ravi K Sharma; Colin O Wu; Chia-Ying Liu; David A Bluemke; Elsayed Z Soliman; João A C Lima; Hiroshi Ashikaga Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Cynthia Philip; Rebecca Seifried; P Gabriel Peterson; Robert Liotta; Kevin Steel; Marcio S Bittencourt; Edward A Hulten Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2021-04-01
Authors: Jong-Chan Youn; Yoo Jin Hong; Hye-Jeong Lee; Kyunghwa Han; Chi Young Shim; Geu-Ru Hong; Young Joo Suh; Jin Hur; Young Jin Kim; Byoung Wook Choi; Seok-Min Kang Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: William S Bradham; Susan P Bell; Douglas W Adkisson; Holly M Smith; Frank E Harrell; Mark A Lawson; Henry Ooi; Douglas B Sawyer; Marvin W Kronenberg Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Mohammad A Khan; Eric Y Yang; Duc T Nguyen; Faisal Nabi; Jeremy Hinojosa; Maria Jabel; Sherif F Nagueh; Edward A Graviss; Dipan J Shah Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 7.792