Literature DB >> 26682910

Molecular analysis of pediatric brain tumors identifies microRNAs in pilocytic astrocytomas that target the MAPK and NF-κB pathways.

Tania A Jones1, Jennie N Jeyapalan1, Tim Forshew1,2, Ruth G Tatevossian1,3, Andrew R J Lawson1,4, Sheena N Patel1, Gabriel T Doctor1, Muhammad A Mumin1, Simon R Picker5,6, Kim P Phipps7, Antony Michalski8, Thomas S Jacques9,10, Denise Sheer11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pilocytic astrocytomas are slow-growing tumors that usually occur in the cerebellum or in the midline along the hypothalamic/optic pathways. The most common genetic alterations in pilocytic astrocytomas activate the ERK/MAPK signal transduction pathway, which is a major driver of proliferation but is also believed to induce senescence in these tumors. Here, we have conducted a detailed investigation of microRNA and gene expression, together with pathway analysis, to improve our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms in pilocytic astrocytomas.
RESULTS: Pilocytic astrocytomas were found to have distinctive microRNA and gene expression profiles compared to normal brain tissue and a selection of other pediatric brain tumors. Several microRNAs found to be up-regulated in pilocytic astrocytomas are predicted to target the ERK/MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways as well as genes involved in senescence-associated inflammation and cell cycle control. Furthermore, IGFBP7 and CEBPB, which are transcriptional inducers of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), were also up-regulated together with the markers of senescence and inflammation, CDKN1A (p21), CDKN2A (p16) and IL1B.
CONCLUSION: These findings provide further evidence of a senescent phenotype in pilocytic astrocytomas. In addition, they suggest that the ERK/MAPK pathway, which is considered the major driver of these tumors, is regulated not only by genetic aberrations but also by microRNAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26682910      PMCID: PMC4683939          DOI: 10.1186/s40478-015-0266-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun        ISSN: 2051-5960            Impact factor:   7.801


Introduction

Pilocytic astrocytomas (WHO grade I) are the most common central nervous system tumors in the 5 to 19 year age group. They are cystic, well-circumscribed tumors, which rarely progress and can usually be removed using surgery [9]. This accounts for their having a more favourable prognosis than diffuse and other infiltrative astrocytomas [39]. Molecular studies on pilocytic astrocytomas have identified recurrent BRAF gene fusions and other alterations that activate the ERK/MAPK signal transduction pathway [15, 27, 56]. Activated ERK/MAPK signaling is believed to drive cellular proliferation and then to trigger senescence, giving rise to the indolent phenotype of pilocytic astrocytomas [24, 42]. MicroRNAs are short RNA molecules that modulate gene expression post-transcriptionally by repressing translation or degrading the mRNA transcript [26]. They regulate numerous biological processes including cell proliferation and differentiation, and have major roles in embryogenesis, including brain and spinal cord development and neurogenesis [13, 41]. Many microRNAs are involved in the initiation and progression of cancer [3, 37], and recent studies of pediatric brain tumors have identified tumor-specific microRNA signatures [5, 21, 38]. To further our knowledge of the molecular drivers of pilocytic astrocytomas, we conducted a detailed investigation of microRNA and gene expression in these tumors, and characterised the findings by pathway analysis. Our results revealed a distinctive microRNA and gene expression profile in pilocytic astrocytoma compared to other pediatric brain tumors. We found that many predicted targets of up-regulated microRNAs in pilocytic astrocytomas are known regulators of the ERK/MAPK and NF-κB pathways. These findings suggest an important modulatory role for microRNAs in critical pathways involved in pilocytic astrocytomas.

Materials and methods

Tumor samples and controls

miRNA and mRNA profiling was performed on a range of fresh frozen brain tumor samples (the test cohort) from 57 children, aged 1–16 years, and on 7 normal adult brain controls (4 frontal lobe and 3 cerebellum, Biochain) (Table 1a). A further 13 pediatric brain tumor samples were used as a validation cohort (Table 1b). Tumors were classified using criteria defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) [36]. Access to samples and clinical data complied with Local Research Ethics Committee (LREC) regulations: Great Ormond Street Hospital LREC reference number 05/Q0508/153. All the test pilocytic astrocytomas were shown previously to contain the KIAA1549-BRAF gene fusion [32]. The BRAF V600E mutation was also examined in the high-grade astrocytomas in the test cohort. KIAA1549-BRAF fusion and the BRAF V600E mutations were also tested in the validation cohort using PCR according to published protocols [32, 45].
Table 1

Pediatric tumor cohorts

TumorPathologyGradeLocationSexAgeBRAF status
a.
PGNTPapillary glioneuronalIFrontal lobeM14nd
PA1Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaF16 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
PA2Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaM12 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
PA3Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaM14 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
PA5Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaF3 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
PA6Pilocytic astrocytomaICerebellumF8 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 15-exon 9
PA7Pilocytic astrocytomaICerebellumM1 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 11
PA8Pilocytic astrocytomaICerebellumM1 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
PA9Pilocytic astrocytomaICerebellumF2 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 11
PA10Pilocytic astrocytomaICerebellumM2 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
PA11Pilocytic astrocytomaICerebellumM6 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
PA12Pilocytic astrocytomaICerebellumF11 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 15-exon 9
PA13Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaM4 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
PA14Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaF6 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
PA15Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaM9 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
DA1Diffuse astrocytomaIITemporal lobeF12No BRAFV600E
DA2Diffuse astrocytomaIIUnknownF14No BRAFV600E
DA3Diffuse astrocytomaIIOccipital lobeM4nd
DA4 *Diffuse astrocytomaIIUnknownM17 BRAFV600E present
AA1Anaplastic astrocytomaIIIConus medullarisM15nd
AA2Anaplastic astrocytomaIIITemporal lobeF3No BRAFV600E
AA3 *Anaplastic astrocytomaIIIUnknownF11No BRAFV600E
GBM1GlioblastomaIVFrontal lobeF15No BRAFV600E
GBM2GlioblastomaIVTemporoparietalM10No BRAFV600E
GBM3GlioblastomaIVBrainstemF4nd
GBM4GlioblastomaIVLeft frontal lobeF10No BRAFV600E
GBM5GlioblastomaIVSpinal cordF7nd
E1EpendymomaIIIPosterior fossaM4
E2EpendymomaIIIParietal lobeF6
E3EpendymomaIIPosterior fossaF2
E4EpendymomaIIIPosterior fossaF2
E5EpendymomaIITemporal lobeM12
E6EpendymomaIIIPosterior fossaM6
E7EpendymomaIIIPosterior fossaM2
E8EpendymomaIISupratentorial (frontal)M14
E9EpendymomaIIPosterior fossaM3
E10EpendymomaIIPosterior fossaM4
E11EpendymomaIIIPosterior fossaFnd
E12EpendymomaIIIFourth ventricleM1
E13EpendymomaIISpinal seedF6
E14EpendymomaIIIPosterior fossaF6
M1MedulloblastomaIVPosterior fossaM4
M2MedulloblastomaIVPosterior fossaM1
M3MedulloblastomaIVPosterior fossaF6 months
M4MedulloblastomaIVPosterior fossaM7
M5MedulloblastomaIVPosterior fossaM3
M6MedulloblastomaIVPosterior fossaM9
M7MedulloblastomaIVPosterior fossaM7
M8MedulloblastomaIVPosterior fossaM9
M9MedulloblastomaIVPosterior fossaM4
M10 *MedulloblastomaIVPosterior fossaF5
R1Atypical RhabdoidIVBrainstemM1
R2Atypical RhabdoidIVPosterior fossaF7 months
R3Atypical RhabdoidIVSupratentorialF2
R4Atypical RhabdoidIVPosterior fossaM9 months
R5Atypical RhabdoidIVPosterior fossaF2 months
P1Choroid Plexus PapillomaIIntraventricular (frontal lateral ventricle)M10 months
P2Choroid Plexus PapillomaIPosterior fossaM1
P3Choroid Plexus PapillomaILeft lateral ventricleM3
P4Choroid Plexus PapillomaIUnknownFnd
AC1Adult control cerebellumCerebellumM22
AC2Adult control frontal lobeFrontal lobeM41
AC3Adult control cerebellumCerebellumM21
AC4Adult control cerebellumCerebellumM26
AC5Adult control frontal lobeFrontal lobeM82
AC6Adult control frontal lobeFrontal lobeM25
AC7Adult control frontal lobeFrontal lobeM27
b.
PA16Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaM9nd
PA17Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaM12nd
PA18Pilocytic astrocytomaISuprasellarM3 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 15-exon 9
PA19Pilocytic astrocytomaI3rd ventricleM16nd
PA20Pilocytic astrocytomaIBrain stemF3 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 15-exon 9
PA21Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaF4 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
PA22Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaM16 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
PA23Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaF2 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 11
PA24Pilocytic astrocytomaIPosterior fossaF12 KIAA1549-BRAF exon 16-exon 9
GBM6GlioblastomaIVMidbrain/ThalamusF14-
GBM7GlioblastomaIVOccipital lobeM4 months-
GBM8GlioblastomaIVThalamic/intraventriclarF10-
GBM9GlioblastomaIIThalamicM15-

(a) Test cohort analysed using Illumina MicroRNA Expression Arrays (MI-v2) and Illumina HumanHT-12_v3 Beadchip system, with the exception of samples marked with an asterisk (*), that were used for validation only

(b) Validation cohort used for confirmation of differentially expressed microRNAs and genes. Annotation: − negative, nd not determined

Pediatric tumor cohorts (a) Test cohort analysed using Illumina MicroRNA Expression Arrays (MI-v2) and Illumina HumanHT-12_v3 Beadchip system, with the exception of samples marked with an asterisk (*), that were used for validation only (b) Validation cohort used for confirmation of differentially expressed microRNAs and genes. Annotation: − negative, nd not determined

MicroRNA and gene expression arrays

MicroRNA expression was profiled in the test tumor cohort and the normal brain controls using Illumina MicroRNA Expression Arrays (MI-v2). This system screens 1,146 known and putative microRNAs including 97 % of microRNAs in miRBase (Release 12.0). Gene expression profiles were obtained for the same tumors and controls using the Illumina HumanHT-12_v3 Beadchip system. RNA was extracted from the samples using TRIzol (Invitrogen) and eluted into RNAse-free water using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized using random hexamers and the SuperScript First-Strand cDNA synthesis system (Invitrogen). Hybridization and scanning were performed in-house at the Barts and The London Genome Centre.

Statistical analysis

The microRNA and gene expression-averaged tumor profiles were compared to normal adult brain controls using GenomeStudio and GeneSpring Multi-Omic Analysis v12.1 software. Data were subjected to thresholding, log transformation (log2), normalization (quantile) and baseline transformation (median to all samples). Normalized data of microRNA and gene expression are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1 and Additional file 2: Table S2. All data were deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus [12] (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) and are accessible through GEO accession number GSE42658. Differential expression was defined as fold change (FC) > 2 with FDR corrected (Benjamini Hochberg) p-values < 0.05. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering (Euclidean method), was performed on both the microRNA and mRNA expression data. The differentially expressed microRNAs and genes are listed in Additional file 3: Table S3 and Additional file 4: Table S4 for tumor groups with more than three samples.

Pathway analysis

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Ingenuity Systems Inc., Redwood City, USA) was used to identify over-represented pathways for significantly differentially expressed genes in pilocytic astrocytomas. The significance value associated with the functional analysis is expressed as a p-value calculated by comparing the number of differentially expressed genes that participate in a given function or pathway, relative to the total number of occurrences of these proteins in all functional/pathway annotations stored in Ingenuity Pathway Knowledge Base. Multiple-testing corrected p-values were calculated using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. For each functional annotation, a statistical quantity is calculated called the regulation z-score. The purpose of the z-score is to identify increased or decreased biological functions that are likely implicated by the observed gene expression changes. Hence, the p-values measure the observed and predicted regulated gene sets, and the z-score assesses the match of the observed and predicted up/down regulation patterns. For this study, we only considered a predicted activation/inhibition status as significant if the p-value was < +/−0.05 and the z-score > 2.0 or < 2.0 respectively.

Taqman microRNA assays

TaqMan miRNA assays were used to validate differentially expressed microRNAs of interest. Control microRNAs RNU48 and miR-423-3p were tested for stability over all tumors and miR-423-3p was selected as the most stable control. Hence all samples were normalized to miR-423-3p and fold change calculated relative to the average expression in adult cerebellum and frontal lobe (BioChain, A508112 and B210079 respectively). Differential expression was validated for miR-542-3p, miR-503, miR-146a, miR-34a, miR-155, miR-124*, miR-129 and miR-129*. TargetScan Release 6.2 (http://www.targetscan.org) was used to search for predicted targets of microRNAs of interest. MicroRNAs are named using the “miR’ prefix and a unique identifying number which is assigned sequentially [2]. Identical or very similar miRNA sequences within a species can be given the same number, with their genes distinguished by a letter and/or numerical suffixes (e.g. miR-450a and miR-450b are slightly different in sequence, whereas those of miR-450a-1 and miR-450a-2 are identical). Some miRNA hairpin precursors give rise to two excised miRNAs, one from each arm. Previous annotations used the nomenclature miR-124 and miR-124* for the guide and passenger strand respectively, and some of these names were included in our Illumina MicroRNA Expression Arrays (MI-v2). However, the mature sequences derived from both arms of the hairpin may be biologically functional, so current nomenclature uses miR-542-5p and miR-542-3p to designate miRNAs from the ‘5’ and ‘3’ arms respectively, [18, 29].

RT-qPCR

PCR primers were designed using Primer 3 software (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/) (Additional file 5: Table S5). RT-qPCR was used to quantify the levels of mRNA expression for selected genes, using SYBR Green JumpStart Taq ReadyMix kit (Sigma-Aldrich), 50 ng cDNA, and 0.1 μM primers in a reaction volume of 20 μl. Assays were run on an ABI 7500 Real Time PCR System (ABI). PCR analyses were conducted in triplicate for each sample and melting curves analyzed for correct product size. Control genes TBP and CREB1 were tested for stability over all tumors, and TBP selected as the most stable endogenous control. Therefore, all samples were normalized to TBP and fold change calculated relative to the average expression in adult cerebellum (BioChain, A508112), and frontal lobe (BioChain B210079). Relative quantification was calculated using the 2-ddCt method [35].

Results

Characterization of the pediatric brain tumor cohort

We first examined microRNA and gene expression in the test tumor cohort that consisted of a papillary glioneuronal tumor (n = 1), pilocytic astrocytomas (n = 14), diffuse astrocytomas (n = 3), anaplastic astrocytomas (n = 2), glioblastomas (n = 5), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) (n = 5), medulloblastomas (n = 9), ependymomas (n = 14) and choroid plexus papillomas (n = 4), total = 57 samples (Table 1a). Differential microRNA expression across the averaged tumor groups was calculated to obtain fold changes compared to normal adult brain controls (FDR < 0.05, Additional file 3: Table S3). The number of up- and down-regulated microRNAs for each tumor type is shown in Table 2. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering (Euclidean method) of microRNAs clustered the tumors by pathology in the low-grade tumors, and showed higher-grade tumors to be more widely distributed (Fig. 1a). A similar pattern was also found using gene expression data (Additional file 2: Table S2), with higher-grade tumors showing greater heterogeneity than low-grade tumors (Fig. 1b). Following initial comparison with other tumor types, microRNA profiles were then investigated in detail in pilocytic astrocytomas, all of which contained the KIAA1549:BRAF gene fusion.
Table 2

Number of differentially expressed microRNAs in pediatric brain tumors compared to normal adult brain

Pathology n RegulationTotal
UpDown
Pilocytic astrocytoma14424991
Pilocytic astrocytomaa 14273360
Diffuse astrocytoma3123
Anaplastic astrocytoma26814
Glioblastoma5055
Ependymoma146075135
Medulloblastoma9253560
Medulloblastomaa 9102939
Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid tumor5151732
Choroid plexus papilloma44763110

aPilocytic astrocytomas and medullobastomas were also compared to normal adult cerebellum. Fold change > 2 with a FDR corrected p-value < 0.05

Fig. 1

Hierarchical clustering of microRNA and mRNA expression stratifies tumor subgroups. Unsupervised hierarchal clustering (Euclidean method) was performed on (a) microRNA and (b) mRNA expression data. Tumors represented as: PA-pilocytic astrocytoma, PGNT-papillary glioneuronal tumor, DA-diffuse astrocytoma, AA-anaplastic astrocytoma, GBM-glioblastoma, E-ependymoma, M-medulloblastoma, R-atypical rhabdoid tumor, P-choroid plexus papilloma and AC1, AC3, AC4-adult control cerebellum and AC2, AC5, AC6, AC7-adult control frontal lobe. nd – not determined

Number of differentially expressed microRNAs in pediatric brain tumors compared to normal adult brain aPilocytic astrocytomas and medullobastomas were also compared to normal adult cerebellum. Fold change > 2 with a FDR corrected p-value < 0.05 Hierarchical clustering of microRNA and mRNA expression stratifies tumor subgroups. Unsupervised hierarchal clustering (Euclidean method) was performed on (a) microRNA and (b) mRNA expression data. Tumors represented as: PA-pilocytic astrocytoma, PGNT-papillary glioneuronal tumor, DA-diffuse astrocytoma, AA-anaplastic astrocytoma, GBM-glioblastoma, E-ependymoma, M-medulloblastoma, R-atypical rhabdoid tumor, P-choroid plexus papilloma and AC1, AC3, AC4-adult control cerebellum and AC2, AC5, AC6, AC7-adult control frontal lobe. nd – not determined

MicroRNA profile and the predicted targeted pathways in Pilocytic Astrocytomas

Profiles from pilocytic astrocytomas were compared with combined adult brain controls, and also with normal adult cerebellum, since this subset of tumors were all located in the cerebellum (Additional file 3: Table S3). Up- and down-regulated microRNAs compared to normal adult cerebellum are shown in Table 3. Amongst the top up-regulated microRNAs was a cluster located on Xq26.3, consisting of miR-542-5p, miR-542-3p, miR-503, mir-450a and miR-450b-5p (Fig. 2). The results were not gender-biased. Other top up-regulated microRNAs included miR-224, miR-146a, miR-34a and the miR-106a ~ miR-363 cluster (Table 3).
Table 3

The top deregulated microRNAs in pilocytic astrocytoma compared to normal adult cerebellum

TargetIDp (Corr)FCLog FC
a.
hsa-miR-2240.0063210.093.33
hsa-miR-542-5p0.005589.693.28
hsa-miR-542-3p0.023667.512.91
hsa-miR-450b-5p0.002856.892.78
hsa-miR-5030.001206.802.76
hsa-miR-450a0.012116.672.74
hsa-miR-886-5p0.005516.172.62
hsa-miR-767-5p0.000024.942.31
HS_290.018114.412.14
hsa-miR-7080.026453.921.97
hsa-miR-146a0.010763.841.94
hsa-miR-34a0.002683.131.65
solexa-539-20560.043793.031.60
hsa-miR-335*0.004862.811.49
hsa-miR-18b0.045292.791.48
hsa-miR-452*0.000002.581.37
hsa-miR-18a0.004412.561.36
hsa-miR-199a*:9.10.036222.561.36
hsa-miR-574-5p0.000002.391.26
hsa-miR-296-3p0.029072.361.24
hsa-miR-1550.013722.331.22
hsa-miR-24-2*0.000002.331.22
hsa-miR-106a0.001492.321.21
hsa-miR-21*0.000732.221.15
HS_262.10.018142.161.11
hsa-miR-3630.010212.071.05
hsa-miR-371-3p0.000022.031.02
b.
hsa-miR-129-3p0.00062−44.25−5.47
hsa-miR-129*0.00000−27.08−4.76
hsa-miR-1224-5p0.00515−16.54−4.05
hsa-miR-124a:9.10.00357−15.84−3.99
hsa-miR-3260.01508−12.16−3.60
hsa-miR-1240.00073−9.66−3.27
hsa-miR-2040.00140−9.65−3.27
hsa-miR-12960.00000−6.94−2.80
hsa-miR-885-5p0.00006−6.76−2.76
hsa-miR-128a:9.10.00149−5.78−2.53
hsa-miR-2180.00504−5.72−2.52
hsa-miR-133b0.00000−5.57−2.48
hsa-miR-8740.00013−5.52−2.46
hsa-miR-769-3p0.02429−4.96−2.31
hsa-miR-485-3p0.01589−4.70−2.23
hsa-miR-128b:9.10.00049−4.68−2.23
HS_182.10.00140−4.45−2.15
hsa-miR-1070.00002−4.38−2.13
hsa-miR-3830.00175−4.36−2.12
hsa-miR-6560.00825−4.35−2.12
hsa-miR-124*0.03622−4.14−2.05
hsa-miR-5840.00130−3.61−1.85
hsa-miR-70.00108−3.40−1.77
hsa-miR-548k0.01014−3.39−1.76
hsa-miR-12370.00149−3.21−1.68
hsa-miR-299-5p0.01076−3.20−1.68
hsa-miR-11790.01508−2.92−1.55
hsa-miR-487b0.03622−2.75−1.46
HS_2310.00367−2.73−1.45
hsa-miR-3290.00101−2.47−1.30
hsa-miR-154*0.00566−2.47−1.30
hsa-miR-8890.01811−2.15−1.11
hsa-miR-135a0.02645−2.06−1.04

(a) Up-regulated microRNAs and (b) down-regulated microRNAs. Differential expression was defined as fold change (FC) > 2 with FDR corrected (Benjamini Hochberg) p-values <0.05

Fig. 2

Expression of a cluster of microRNAs on Xq26.3 in pilocytic astrocytomas. (a) Map of microRNA genes showing up-regulated microRNAs transcribed in the same direction. (b) Illumina MicroRNA Expression array (MI-v2) data showing up-regulation of miR-503, miR-542-3p, miR-542-5p, miR-450a and miR-450b-5p in pilocytic astrocytoma compared to normal brain controls. The Illumina probe miR-450a contains the seed sequence present in both miR-450a-1 and miR-450a-2

The top deregulated microRNAs in pilocytic astrocytoma compared to normal adult cerebellum (a) Up-regulated microRNAs and (b) down-regulated microRNAs. Differential expression was defined as fold change (FC) > 2 with FDR corrected (Benjamini Hochberg) p-values <0.05 Expression of a cluster of microRNAs on Xq26.3 in pilocytic astrocytomas. (a) Map of microRNA genes showing up-regulated microRNAs transcribed in the same direction. (b) Illumina MicroRNA Expression array (MI-v2) data showing up-regulation of miR-503, miR-542-3p, miR-542-5p, miR-450a and miR-450b-5p in pilocytic astrocytoma compared to normal brain controls. The Illumina probe miR-450a contains the seed sequence present in both miR-450a-1 and miR-450a-2 All the pilocytic astrocytomas used in the test cohort contain the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion that activates the ERK/MAPK pathway. Analysis of up-regulated microRNAs using TargetScan revealed several predicted targets to be regulators of the MAPK pathway. These included miR-155, which targets KRAS, miR-34a, which targets MAP2K1 (MEK1), and miR-503, which targets MAPK1 (ERK1) (Fig. 3). Other up-regulated microRNAs, including MiR-450b, miR-542-3p and miR-155, are all predicted to target ETS1, MYC and FOS, which are regulated by MAPK pathway components. In addition, the up-regulated microRNAs, miR-155, miR-199a, miR-21 and miR-146a (Fig. 4a), target genes within the NF-κB network (Figs. 3). Analysis of brain-specific microRNAs [49] showed no significant differences in expression in pilocytic astrocytomas, apart from down-regulation of miR-218. However, the majority of pilocytic astrocytomas showed low expression of neuronal-specific microRNAs, miR-129, miR-124 and miR-128 [50, 51] (Additional file 3: Table S3).
Fig. 3

Model showing the interplay of microRNAs in senescence, proliferation and inflammation. MicroRNAs provide negative feedback of the RB pathway, the MAPK pathway and the NF-κΒ network. MiR-34a and miR-503 are predicted to target CCND1 and CDK4 to limit cell proliferation via the RB pathway. MiR-155 is predicted to target KRAS, miR-34a is predicted to target MEK1, whilst down stream targets of the MAPK pathway include SPRED1 (a predicted target of miR-503), SPRY1, SPRY2 and SPRY4 (predicted targets of miR-450b-5p) and FOS and ETS1 (predicted targets of miR-155). MicroRNAs that act as effectors and regulators of NF-κB include miR-146a, miR-155, miR-199a and miR-21. MiR-146a, miR-224 and miR-155 are predicted to target senescenceassociated genes and thus to regulate levels of inflammation

Fig. 4

Expression of microRNAs and genes involved in senescence in pilocytic astrocytomas. (a) Illumina MicroRNA Expression array (MI-v2) data showing miR-146a and miR-155 are up-regulated in the majority of pilocytic astrocytomas and (b) Illumina HumanHT-12_v3 expression array data showing a higher level of expression for CDKN2A, IGFBP7 and TIMP1 in pilocytic astrocytomas compared to normal brain controls

Model showing the interplay of microRNAs in senescence, proliferation and inflammation. MicroRNAs provide negative feedback of the RB pathway, the MAPK pathway and the NF-κΒ network. MiR-34a and miR-503 are predicted to target CCND1 and CDK4 to limit cell proliferation via the RB pathway. MiR-155 is predicted to target KRAS, miR-34a is predicted to target MEK1, whilst down stream targets of the MAPK pathway include SPRED1 (a predicted target of miR-503), SPRY1, SPRY2 and SPRY4 (predicted targets of miR-450b-5p) and FOS and ETS1 (predicted targets of miR-155). MicroRNAs that act as effectors and regulators of NF-κB include miR-146a, miR-155, miR-199a and miR-21. MiR-146a, miR-224 and miR-155 are predicted to target senescenceassociated genes and thus to regulate levels of inflammation Expression of microRNAs and genes involved in senescence in pilocytic astrocytomas. (a) Illumina MicroRNA Expression array (MI-v2) data showing miR-146a and miR-155 are up-regulated in the majority of pilocytic astrocytomas and (b) Illumina HumanHT-12_v3 expression array data showing a higher level of expression for CDKN2A, IGFBP7 and TIMP1 in pilocytic astrocytomas compared to normal brain controls Oncogene-induced senescence is associated with activation of an inflammatory transcriptome [31], and since senescence markers have been identified in pilocytic astrocytomas, we examined expression levels of microRNAs and genes known to be associated with senescence. MiR-146a was amongst the top up-regulated microRNAs in pilocytic astrocytomas, and is known to modulate senescence-associated inflammatory mediators (Fig. 4a) [4]. Furthermore, CDKN1A (p21) and CDKN2A (p16) were found to be up-regulated, together with the major transcriptional inducers of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), IGFBP7 and TIMP1 (Fig. 4b), as well as CEBPB, TIMP2, TIMP3, AXL and other insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins that stimulate inflammation, including IGFBP2, IGFBP3, IGFBP4 and IGFBP5 (Additional file 4: Table S4). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis was used to compare gene expression data between pilocytic astrocytomas and normal adult cerebellum. The top canonical pathways showing significant up-regulation included Antigen Presentation Pathway, Graft-versus-Host Disease Signaling, Type I Diabetes Mellitus Signaling, Hepatic Fibrosis/Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Dendritic Cell Maturation. Analysis of the predicted activation state of up-stream transcription factors showed 70 factors predicted as ‘activated’ and 28 predicted as ‘inhibited’ (p < 0.05, activation z-score > 2.0) (Additional file 6: Table S6a, b). Predicted ‘activated’ transcription factors included NF-kB complex, TP53, IRF7, CEBPB, JUN, RELA and CEBPA, whilst predicted ‘inhibited’ transcription factors included TRIM24, MYC, MYCN, estrogen receptor and RB. Using TaqMan assays and Real Time qRT-PCR, we confirmed the differential expression of a set of microRNAs and genes in a selection of the test tumor cohort, as well as 13 tumors from the validation tumor cohort (Additional file 7: Figure S1 and Additional file 8: Figure S2). We confirmed up-regulation of miR-34a, miR-146a, miR-542-3p, miR-503 and miR-155 and low expression of neuronal microRNAs miR-124*, miR-129 and miR-129* (Additional file 7: Figure S1). Up-regulation of the senescence factors IGFBP7, CDKN2A (p16), IL6, IL8, CDKN1A (p21) and down-regulation of CTCF was also confirmed (Additional file 8: Figure S2).

Discussion

To gain a comprehensive understanding of tumorigenesis, it is critical to integrate findings on factors that regulate the transcriptome, such as microRNAs, with genomic analysis. This is especially pertinent in the case of pediatric CNS tumors, which have fewer mutational events than their adult counterparts [48, 54]. MicroRNAs are highly regulated and have essential functions in brain development [23, 30], and certain microRNAs are enriched or specifically expressed in the adult brain [49]. Here, we profiled microRNA and gene expression in a cohort of pediatric brain tumors, and then focused on the potential role of microRNAs in pilocytic astrocytomas. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade is the main molecular pathway that is deregulated in pilocytic astrocytomas [56]. BRAF-gene fusions and, in rare cases, BRAF V600E mutations give rise to constitutively active BRAF, which in turn activates the MAPK pathway. Furthermore, BRAF activation has been shown to cause oncogene-induced senescence in vitro [24, 42]. Hence, we obtained gene expression profiles for pilocytic astrocytomas in order to identify any senescent or inflammatory markers that may explain the less aggressive nature of these tumors. Senescence is accompanied by increased secretion of factors involved in senescent signaling. In pilocytic astrocytomas, we observed up-regulation of IGFBP7 and CEBPB, both of which are major transcriptional inducers of SASP-related genes [16]. In addition, we observed up-regulation of IL1B, which has been shown to be a SASP-associated protein [10]. Our gene expression profiling of pilocytic astrocytomas also revealed up-regulation of many genes involved in immune function. This was supported by pathway analysis, which showed that pilocytic astrocytomas exhibit a strong immune and inflammatory response. There is accumulating evidence for a role for certain microRNAs in senescence [1, 17, 19]. The miR-424-miR-503 polycistron, as well as miR-450, miR-542-3p and miR-450b-5p are suggested to play a role in replicative senescence and cellular aging in fibroblasts [6]. MiR-424 and miR-503 can induce G1 arrest in THP-1 cells [14] and may limit proliferation in pilocytic astrocytomas. Recently, expression of miR-542-5p, which is repressed in MYC-amplified neuroblastomas was shown to be positively correlated with survival [46]. Interestingly, CTCF, a predicted target of miR-542-3p, is down-regulated in pilocytic astrocytoma, and a recent investigation into the higher-order chromatin structure of the INK4/ARF locus in senescent cells, has revealed down-regulation of CTCF in oncogene-induced senescent cells [20]. Predicted targets of differentially regulated microRNAs frequently included components of the ERK/MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways (Fig. 3). MiR-503 and miR155 are predicted to target components of the ERK/MAPK pathway, as well as miR-34a which can induce cell cycle arrest by targeting Notch ligand delta-like 1, a component of NOTCH signaling [11], and cell cycle regulators CCND1 and CDK6 [52]. The same microRNAs are also predicted to target components of NF-κB signaling. MiR-155 has many target genes including IKKε, suggesting a role in the immune response [53]. In ovarian tumors, miR-199a negatively regulates IKKβ expression to reduce NF-κB activity [8]. NF-κB is reported to be a direct transcriptional regulator of miR-224 [47] and we observe up-regulation of the miR-224 in our pilocytic astrocytomas. In addition, miR-224 has been shown to target the tumor suppressor RKIP in human breast cancer [22]. MiR-146a, which is induced by inflammation in the presence of NF-κB and IL1 receptor signaling to modulate senescent mediators, is up-regulated specifically in pilocytic astrocytomas [4]. In fibroblasts, miR-146a/b down-regulates IRAK1 to reduce IL6 and IL8 secretion in an elegant feedback loop [4]. The expression of miR-146a is a late manifestation of senescence [43] and it is possible that the few pilocytic astrocytomas that do not show elevated expression of miR-146a have not reached a “mature” level of the senescent phenotype. Brain tissues are composed of multiple neuronal, astroglial, microglial and other cell types, so the relative contributions of each brain cell type to the overall microRNA and gene expression profiles remain to be elucidated. MiR-146a and miR-155 are expressed by activated microglia and astroglial cells in culture [7, 34, 44]. Therefore, it is possible that some of our up-regulated microRNAs could also potentially represent the proliferating microglia that are reported to be present in pilocytic astrocytomas [28]. A recent study has demonstrated that increased activation of RAS/ERK signaling in neocortical progenitors produced a NEUROG2-ASCL1 switch, which promotes glial fate [55]. This developmental neurogenic to gliogenic switch in transcription factor expression is supported in studies of RAS-driven glioma formation from neural stem cells [25, 40]. In a recently developed mouse model of gliomagenesis, high RAS/ERK levels were found to modify Ascl1 activity giving rise to glial tumors [33], and we observe clear up-regulation of ASCL1 in the pilocytic astrocytomas (Additional file 4: Table S4). These authors demonstrated that whilst RAS/ERK signaling is critical for neurodevelopment, ERK is the key effector as it phosphorylates the ASCL1 protein resulting in its gliogenic effect. Hence, enhanced RAS/ERK signaling in the pilocytic astrocytomas by activated BRAF may have triggered a gliogenic switch, and this is reflected in the expression of microRNAs that are usually observed in astroglial cells.

Conclusions

In summary, we show that pilocytic astrocytomas differentially express microRNAs that target genes that encode regulators of the MAPK and NF-κB pathways, as well as genes that are markers of inflammation. These microRNAs and the post-translational regulation of their gene targets may therefore play a role in the unique phenotype of pilocytic astrocytomas.
  56 in total

1.  Induction of microRNAs, mir-155, mir-222, mir-424 and mir-503, promotes monocytic differentiation through combinatorial regulation.

Authors:  A R R Forrest; M Kanamori-Katayama; Y Tomaru; T Lassmann; N Ninomiya; Y Takahashi; M J L de Hoon; A Kubosaki; A Kaiho; M Suzuki; J Yasuda; J Kawai; Y Hayashizaki; D A Hume; H Suzuki
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  MicroRNAs miR-146a/b negatively modulate the senescence-associated inflammatory mediators IL-6 and IL-8.

Authors:  Dipa Bhaumik; Gary K Scott; Shiruyeh Schokrpur; Christopher K Patil; Arturo V Orjalo; Francis Rodier; Gordon J Lithgow; Judith Campisi
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.682

3.  Modulation of miR-155 and miR-125b levels following lipopolysaccharide/TNF-alpha stimulation and their possible roles in regulating the response to endotoxin shock.

Authors:  Esmerina Tili; Jean-Jacques Michaille; Amelia Cimino; Stefan Costinean; Calin Dan Dumitru; Brett Adair; Muller Fabbri; Hannes Alder; Chang Gong Liu; George Adrian Calin; Carlo Maria Croce
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway: a signature genetic defect in posterior fossa pilocytic astrocytomas.

Authors:  Tim Forshew; Ruth G Tatevossian; Andrew R J Lawson; Jing Ma; Geoff Neale; Babatunji W Ogunkolade; Tania A Jones; Johan Aarum; James Dalton; Simon Bailey; Tracy Chaplin; Rowena L Carter; Amar Gajjar; Alberto Broniscer; Bryan D Young; David W Ellison; Denise Sheer
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Downregulation of CCND1 and CDK6 by miR-34a induces cell cycle arrest.

Authors:  Fang Sun; Hanjiang Fu; Qin Liu; Yi Tie; Jie Zhu; Ruiyun Xing; Zhixian Sun; Xiaofei Zheng
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Regulation of IKKbeta by miR-199a affects NF-kappaB activity in ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  R Chen; A B Alvero; D A Silasi; M G Kelly; S Fest; I Visintin; A Leiser; P E Schwartz; T Rutherford; G Mor
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Oncogene-induced senescence relayed by an interleukin-dependent inflammatory network.

Authors:  Thomas Kuilman; Chrysiis Michaloglou; Liesbeth C W Vredeveld; Sirith Douma; Remco van Doorn; Christophe J Desmet; Lucien A Aarden; Wolter J Mooi; Daniel S Peeper
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  The guardian's little helper: microRNAs in the p53 tumor suppressor network.

Authors:  Xingyue He; Lin He; Gregory J Hannon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Coppé; Christopher K Patil; Francis Rodier; Yu Sun; Denise P Muñoz; Joshua Goldstein; Peter S Nelson; Pierre-Yves Desprez; Judith Campisi
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system.

Authors:  David N Louis; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Webster K Cavenee; Peter C Burger; Anne Jouvet; Bernd W Scheithauer; Paul Kleihues
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 17.088

View more
  15 in total

1.  MiR-1248: a new prognostic biomarker able to identify supratentorial hemispheric pediatric low-grade gliomas patients associated with progression.

Authors:  Giuseppina Catanzaro; Zein Mersini Besharat; Andrea Carai; Natalie Jäger; Elena Splendiani; Carole Colin; Agnese Po; Martina Chiacchiarini; Anna Citarella; Francesca Gianno; Antonella Cacchione; Evelina Miele; Francesca Diomedi Camassei; Marco Gessi; Luca Massimi; Franco Locatelli; David T W Jones; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Stefan M Pfister; Angela Mastronuzzi; Felice Giangaspero; Elisabetta Ferretti
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 2.  Pineal Gland Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Joham Choque-Velasquez; Szymon Baluszek; Roberto Colasanti; Sajjad Muhammad; Juha Hernesniemi
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Silencing Pre-B-cell leukemia homeobox 3 decreases the proliferation of human glioma cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xiupeng Xu; Ning Cai; Zhongyuan Bao; Yongping You; Jing Ji; Ning Liu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  MicroRNA profile of pediatric pilocytic astrocytomas identifies two tumor-specific signatures when compared to non-neoplastic white matter.

Authors:  Luiz Guilherme Darrigo Júnior; Regia Caroline Peixoto Lira; Paola Fernanda Fedatto; David Santos Marco Antonio; Elvis Terci Valera; Simone Aguiar; José Andres Yunes; Silvia Regina Brandalise; Luciano Neder; Fabiano Pinto Saggioro; Aline Paixão Becker; Ricardo Santos de Oliveira; Hélio Rubens Machado; Rodrigo Alexandre Panepucci; Luiz Gonzaga Tone; Carlos Alberto Scrideli
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  MicroRNA profiling of low-grade glial and glioneuronal tumors shows an independent role for cluster 14q32.31 member miR-487b.

Authors:  Heather Marion Ames; Ming Yuan; Maria Adelita Vizcaíno; Wayne Yu; Fausto J Rodriguez
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  MicroRNA (miR) 125b regulates cell growth and invasion in pediatric low grade glioma.

Authors:  Ming Yuan; Ana Cristina A L Da Silva; Antje Arnold; Laurence Okeke; Heather Ames; Lina S Correa-Cerro; M Adelita Vizcaino; Cheng-Ying Ho; Charles G Eberhart; Fausto J Rodriguez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  In silico analysis identified miRNA‑based therapeutic agents against glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Xiong; Wen-Qing Xu; Rong-Quan He; Yi-Wu Dang; Gang Chen; Dian-Zhong Luo
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 8.  Reimagining pilocytic astrocytomas in the context of pediatric low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Till Milde; Fausto J Rodriguez; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Nirav Patil; Charles G Eberhart; David H Gutmann
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 13.029

9.  DNA methylation analysis of paediatric low-grade astrocytomas identifies a tumour-specific hypomethylation signature in pilocytic astrocytomas.

Authors:  Jennie N Jeyapalan; Gabriel T Doctor; Tania A Jones; Samuel N Alberman; Alexander Tep; Chirag M Haria; Edward C Schwalbe; Isabel C F Morley; Alfred A Hill; Magdalena LeCain; Diego Ottaviani; Steven C Clifford; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Ruth G Tatevossian; David W Ellison; Denise Sheer
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 7.801

Review 10.  The Oncogenic Relevance of miR-17-92 Cluster and Its Paralogous miR-106b-25 and miR-106a-363 Clusters in Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Renata Gruszka; Magdalena Zakrzewska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.