Literature DB >> 26682691

Effect of Anserine/Carnosine Supplementation on Verbal Episodic Memory in Elderly People.

Tatsuhiro Hisatsune1, Jun Kaneko1, Hiroki Kurashige1, Yuan Cao2, Hideo Satsu2, Mamoru Totsuka2, Yoshinori Katakura3, Etsuko Imabayashi4, Hiroshi Matsuda4.   

Abstract

Our goal in this study was to determine whether or not anserine/carnosine supplementation (ACS) is capable of preserving cognitive function of elderly people. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, volunteers were randomly assigned to an ACS or placebo group at a 1:1 ratio. The ACS group took 1.0 g of an anserine/carnosine (3:1) formula daily for 3 months. Participants were evaluated by psychological tests before and after the 3-month supplementation period. Thirty-nine healthy elderly volunteers (60-78 years old) completed the follow-up tests. Among the tests, delayed recall verbal memory assessed by the Wechsler Memory Scale-Logical Memory showed significant preservation in the ACS group, compared to the placebo group (p = 0.0128). Blood analysis revealed a decreased secretion of inflammatory cytokines, including CCL-2 and IL-8, in the ACS group. MRI analysis using arterial spin labeling showed a suppression in the age-related decline in brain blood flow in the posterior cingulate cortex area in the ACS group, compared to the placebo group (p = 0.0248). In another randomized controlled trial, delayed recall verbal memory showed significant preservation in the ACS group, compared to the placebo group (p = 0.0202). These results collectively suggest that ACS may preserve verbal episodic memory and brain perfusion in elderly people, although further study is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; anserine and carnosine; cognitive function; dementia; elderly people; inflammatory cytokine; perfusion MRI; randomized controlled trial; verbal memory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26682691      PMCID: PMC4927867          DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis        ISSN: 1387-2877            Impact factor:   4.472


INTRODUCTION

The number of people worldwide living with dementia is estimated to be 47 million in 2015, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia [1]. Diagnosis and intervention at early stages of dementia may greatly reduce the number of individuals suffering from AD. The onset of its symptoms typically begins with a subtle decline in memory and progresses to global deterioration. Lifestyle improvements, including increased intellectual and physical activity, and nutritional improvement [2-4], that decelerate this process may delay or prevent the onset of AD. Among them, dietary improvements can help decelerate a decline in memory and may prevent AD [4, 5]. Here, we investigated the effects of dietary supplementation with anserine (beta-alanyl-1-methyl-L-histidine) and carnosine (beta-alanyl-L-histidine), functional dipeptides from animal meat, which also referred to as imidazole-containing dipeptides, on healthy elderly people. Carnosine is an endogenous dipeptide consisting of beta-alanine and histidine, present in the milimolar range in skeletal muscle and in the hundred-micromolar range in the vertebrate brain [6]. Carnosine has many biochemical functions, including buffering, metal ion chelating, antioxidant, and anti-glycation activities, and a wide variety of physiological functions, mainly in excitable cells, including skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle cells, and nerve cells [6, 7]. We previously reported that carnosine supplementation prevents memory deficit in a transgenic AD mouse model fed a high-fat diet [8]. These mice show an increased expression of RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end product) in blood vessels, which is inhibited by carnosine supplementation, suggesting that carnosine suppresses microvascular brain damage in this mouse model [8]. Carnosine is cleaved by carnosinase to beta-alanine and histidine. In rodents, serum carnosinase activity is low, so carnosine administration elevates the plasma carnosine level. However, in humans, high serum carnosinase activity limits the biomedical effectiveness of carnosine supplementation. Anserine is a natural carnosine derivative that is not cleaved by carnosinase. Anserine (beta-alanyl-1-methyl-L-histidine) is a methylated form of carnosine that is present at high levels in the breast skeletal muscle of chicken. Owing to their identical chemical structures, except for anserine’s methylation, anserine and carnosine have equivalent reported physiological functions [6]. At present, anserine alone is not commercially available, but we could obtain an anserine/carnosine mixture prepared from chicken meat. In a clinical study, Szcześniak et al. [9] suggested that anserine and carnosine supplementation (ACS) has beneficial effects on physical capacity and cognitive functioning in elderly people. In this study, we examined the effect of ACS on the preservation and/or improvement of a subtle memory decline in elderly people. We recruited elderly volunteers (≥60 years old) in the Tokyo area and evaluated the effects of ACS in a double-blind pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT). To this end, we evaluated the participantsverbal episodic memory function by the use of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Logical Memory (WMS-R LM) [10, 11]. In addition, normal aging is associated with diminished brain perfusion measured as cerebral blood flow, and a study using a perfusion MRI method, arterial spin labeling (ASL), showed a clear age-dependent decrease in blood flow, most noticeably in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) region [12]. Therefore, to elucidate the effect of ACS, we also examined the participants’ brain perfusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants

Sixty-nine healthy participants (41–78 years of age) were recruited from June 2012 to November 2013 from the Tokyo metropolitan area (Supplementary Table 1). The participants were required to visit the study site twice, 3 months apart. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Subjects with the following indications were excluded from the study: 1) individuals with a neuropsychiatric disorder or head injury; 2) individuals with a local lesion, such as a brain tumor or cerebral infarction, which could affect cognitive function; and 3) individuals with metal or electrical implants or claustrophobia that could prevent MRI scanning. The accepted participants were randomized to the ACS or placebo group. RCT-consistent assignment to the ACS or placebo group was determined by age and gender and performed by Imepro Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). All clinical and coordinating personnel and participants were blinded to the group assignments for the duration of the study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the University of Tokyo and of the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, in 2012. The present report is of an age-restricted (≥60 years old) sub-analysis from this healthy volunteer study, and used the data from 39 elderly volunteers (≥60 years old) who completed the study (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of participants who completed 3 month-test

Active (19)Placebo (20)p
Age (mean±SD)67.8±5.670.6±5.10.12
Gender (M/F)8/119/100.74
BMI21.6±3.021.0±5.40.68
Education (y)14.9±2.515.2±2.40.80
MMSE28.6±1.629.0±1.10.48

Significance was determined according to Student t-test, and chi-square test (for gender).

In another RCT, healthy participants (60–80 years of age) were recruited from April 2014 to August 2014 from the Tokyo metropolitan area. The participants were required to visit the study site twice, 6 months apart. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants as above mentioned. The accepted participants were randomized to the ACS or placebo group.

Testing formulae

The test formula was a powder containing anserine and carnosine (3:1) derived from chicken meat, provided by NH Foods Ltd., Japan. Participants in the ACS group received twice-daily doses of the imidazole dipeptide formula (500 mg/dose). The safety of this formula was previously verified by two independent studies [13, 14]. The placebo formula contained an equivalent amount of essential amino acids as in the test formula (43 mg/day L-lysine) and 150 mg/day L-histidine, because the enzymatic digestion of carnosine (250 mg/day) generates L-histidine (150 mg/day) and beta-alanine. Both treatments were granular solids taken orally over a 3-month period.

Inventory of food intake during the 3-month test period

A dietary survey was conducted using a semi-quantitative method as reported elsewhere [15]. At the time of follow-up, the participants filled out a self-administered questionnaire on the frequency of animal meat (chicken, pork, and beef) and fish meat (red meat fish represented by tuna, white fish by salmon, blue-back fish by mackerel, and eel) intake over the previous 3 months. In Japan, this three-item fish consumption inquiry is most popular, and salmon is classified into white fish even though its meat color is pink. The representative fish in each category was based on the national consumption survey. The average anserine and carnosine concentrations in these animal and fish meats were obtained from Boldyrev et al. [6], and dietary intake was estimated from the responses to the questionnaire.

Cognitive testing

The following cognitive evaluation tools and self-reported questionnaires were used to assess the effects of ACS on cognitive function, mental status, and general health: 1) the Japanese version of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Logical Memory immediate recall (WMS-LM1) and delayed recall (WMS-LM2) tests [10, 11], and 2) the Japanese version of a cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale (ADAScog) [17]. Mood and subjective states were assessed by the Japanese version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [18, 19]. In addition, mental and physical functional well-being was assessed by the Medical Outcomes Study, 36-item Short Form (SF-36) [20, 21]. The Mental Health Component Summary (MCS) score and Physical Health Component Summary (PCS) score were calculated, with higher scores indicating better functioning. The cognitive and psychological tests were performed under double-blind conditions. A Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was also conducted, to assess baseline cognitive function [22].

Blood sampling and immunoassays

The concentrations of 27 cytokines in serum samples collected from the volunteers at the baseline and during the follow-up test were measured by a Luminex-based multiplex beads array assay using the Bio-Plex Pro Human Cytokine Group I 27-plex panel (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc; Hercules, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cytokine panel included interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-1Rα, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8 (CXCL8), IL-9, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17, CCL-2 (MCP-1), CCL-3 (MIP-1α), CCL-4 (MIP-1β), CCL-5 (RANTES), CCL-11 (Eotaxin), CXCL10 (IP-10), FGF-basic, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, PDGF-bb, TNF-α, and VEGF. Cytokine levels below the lower limit of detection were reported as the mid-point between the lowest concentration measured and zero, as reported elsewhere [23]. IL-15 was omitted from further analysis because it was beneath the detection limit in all cases. The false discovery rate method (FDR) [24] was used to correct for multiple comparisons for cytokines. P-values less than 0.01 were considered significant.

Microarray analysis

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from volunteers were used for total RNA extraction. The total RNA quality was assessed using the Agilent system according to the manufacturer’s protocol. We eliminated one RNA sample from the Active group from further analysis. The total RNA was reverse transcribed to synthesize the first-strand cDNA, followed by second-strand synthesis. Double-stranded cDNAs were used to synthesize biotin-labeled complementary mRNA (cRNA). The cRNA samples from the volunteers were hybridized onto a Whole Human Genome oligo DNA Microarray Ver2.0 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., CA, USA), as described elsewhere [25]. The rawsignal intensities and Flags for each probe were calculated from the hybridization intensities (gProcessedSignal) and spot information (gIsSaturated, etc.), according to the procedures recommended by Agilent. The raw signal intensities of 120 samples were normalized by the quantile algorithm in the ‘preprocessCore’ library package [26] in the Bioconductor software [27]. The log fold-change of each selected probe in paired samples was calculated, and Student’s t-test was applied using the MeV software [28]. The criteria for significantly different gene expressions was p <  0.01.

Acquisition of human MRI data and MRI data analysis

MRI analyses were performed with a 3 T scanner (Siemens, MAGNETOM Verio 3.0T), using a 32-channel phased array head coil. MRI data of the study participants were collected at two time points: prior to and after supplementation. During MRI scanning, headgear and earplugs were used to limit head motion and reduce scanner noise. For each participant, 3D T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) images were collected, using the following parameters: TR = 1900 ms, TE = 2.52 ms, TI = 90 ms, flip angle = 9°, field of view (FoV) = 256×256 mm, acquisition matrix = 256×256, slice thickness = 1.0 mm, slice gap = 0 mm, slice number = 192 [29]. The 3D pulsed ASL (pASL) perfusion images were collected by turbo gradient spin echo using the following parameters: TR = 5000 ms, TE = 38.8 ms, TI = 2350 ms, flip angle = 180°, FoV = 192×192 mm, acquisition matrix = 64×64, slice thickness = 3.0 mm, slice gap = 1.5 mm, slice number = 40, bolus duration = 700 ms. The 3D pASL data calculated from the MRI data collected before and after supplementation were analyzed using the statistical parametric mapping 12 (SPM12) system. The data were spatially normalized to the MNI coordinates using the DARTEL method [30], and then smoothed with a full width parameter at half-maximal resolution of 12 mm×12 mm×12 mm for 3D pASL as reported before [12]. To compare the perfusion changes that occurred over the 3-month supplementation period between the ACS and placebo groups, these spatially normalized with the 3D T1-weighted image (WI) data and smoothed pASL data were subjected to a two-way intra-subject analysis assessing the time and group interaction. For additional MRI examinations, diffusion MRI, resting-state (rs) fMRI, and T2-FLAIR data were obtained from the participants. The diffusion tensor images were collected by EPI-diffusion with the following parameters: TR = 14100 ms, TE = 81 ms, flip angle = 90°, FoV = 224×224 mm, acquisition matrix = 114×114, slice thickness = 2.0 mm, slice number = 75, axes = 30, b-factor = 0 and 1000 s/mm2. The rsfMRI scans were acquired using a gradient-echo echo-planar sequence with repetition time TR = 3000 ms; echo time TE = 30 ms; flip angle 80°; with 48 axial slices; 3.3-mm slice thickness with no gap; each slice consisted of 64×64 voxels, resulting in a 3.30×3.31×3.31 voxel dimension. T2-fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) scans were acquired with a repetition time TR = 11000 ms; echo time TE = 94 ms; inversion time TI = 2800 ms; with 20 axial slices; FoV = 198×220 mm, and were used to confirm that there were no neurological or inflammatory disorders (e.g., multiple sclerosis).

RESULTS

This analysis used the data from elderly (≥60 years of age) volunteers who completed the study. The subjects were randomly assigned to the ACS and placebo groups. As shown in Fig. 1, thirty-nine elderly participants completed both the baseline and follow-up tests. The group characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, gender, body mass index, education, or MMSE score, although there was a slight age difference between the two groups due to random drop-out. The baseline MMSE score of all of the participants was greater than 23.
Fig.1

Flow diagram showing the number of elderly participants (≥60 years old) during the study. 1st test: baseline. 2nd test: 3 months after supplementation.

The purpose of this study was to test the effect of anserine/carnosine supplementation, but these dipeptides are also obtained from the diet. To estimate daily intake from the diet, we estimated the anserine+carnosine intake from animal and fish meats using a 7-item meat intake frequency questionnaire (Fig. 2 and Table 2). There was no statistical difference in the daily anserine/carnosine intake from the diet between the two groups. Taking the dietary intake into account, the ACS group took in approximately 3 times more anserine/carnosine than the placebo group.
Fig.2

Chemical structures of anserine and carnosine. Anserine (β-Alanyl-L-Methyl-Histidine) and carnosine (β-Alanyl-L-Histidine) are sometimes called as imidazole-containing dipeptides.

Table 2

Estimated intake of anserine and carnosine in each group

FoodActive Group Ave.±SDPlacebo Group Ave.±SDp value
Anserine (mg/day)Poultry217±179198±1670.73
Pork9.3±8.04.4±3.10.02
Beef7.9±7.97.2±9.70.79
Eel0±00±0N. D.
White fish120±13898±860.56
Blue back Fish1.2±1.21.5±1.60.48
Red meat Fish54.9±53.367.0±63.50.53
Anserine from daily food 411±278 377±2710.70
Anserine from supplementation 750 0N. D.
Anserine (Total) 1,161±278 377±2719.5E-11
Carnosine (mg/day)Poultry60.9±50.355.6±46.90.73
Pork124±10658.8±41.40.02
Beef38.6±38.334.9±46.90.79
Eel7.4±5.36.1±1.70.34
White fish0±00±0N. D.
Blue back Fish32.5±33.441.4±43.70.48
Red meat Fish4.3±4.25.3±5.00.53
Carnosine from daily food 268±135 202±1100.10
Carnosine from supplementation 250 0N. D.
Carnosine (Total) 518±135 202±1101.3E-09
Anserine+Carnosine (mg/day) 1,679±384 579±360 4.0E-11

Estimated intake of anserine and carnosine was calculated from the results of a 7-item food frequency questionnaires filled out by each volunteer (Materials and Methods section 2.3. Inventory of food intake during 3-month test period) and the average amount of anserine and carnosine in various types of meat described by Boldyrev et al. [6].

Cognitive tests

To evaluate cognitive function at baseline and follow-up, we performed two neuropsychological tests (Table 3). For the WMS-LM2 test, used to assess the delayed recall of verbal memory, we used two different stories (story A and story B) for the baseline and follow-up tests, respectively. Data were analyzed using a two-way repeated ANOVA (Time [baseline or follow-up]×Variant [ACS or placebo]). The interaction Time×Variant was significant before (F[1,37] = 9.067, p = 0.0047; Fig. 3) and after adjusting for age (F[1] = 6.8588, p = 0.0128). There was an effect of time (F[1,37] = 15.29, p = 0.0001), but not of variant (F[1,37] = 0.2621, p = 0.61). After a Bonferroni post-hoc test, we observed a significant decrease in the score for the placebo group (DF[37], t[4.958], p <  0.0001), but not for the ACS group (DF[37], t[0.6281], p >  0.9999). In the WMS-LM1 test, used to assess the immediate recall of verbal memory, we did not see any difference between the two groups: the interaction Time×Variant was not significant (F[1,37] = 0.7871, p = 0.3807).
Table 3

Scores of neuropsychological tests of the ACS and placebo groups

Baseline (ave.±SD)Follow-up (ave.±SD)Change (ave.±SD)Interaction (df = 1)
ActivePlaceboActivePlaceboActivePlaceboFp value
WMS-LM113.4±4.213.2±3.911.4±3.610.2±3.7–2.0±4.2–3.0±2.80.7870.3807
WMS-LM211.9±4.113.1±3.611.4±3.69.1±4.10.5±3.84.1±3.59.0670.0047 **
ADAScog9.6±3.79.1±9.28.8±4.69.2±4.7–0.80±3.50.16±4.90.5000.4839
BDI10.2±6.48.8±6.96.8±4.87.4±4.4–3.4±4.2–1.4±5.61.6410.2082
SF-36 MCS54.0±8.650.6±7.054.0±7.552.8±5.9–0.02±6.52.12±6.81.0240.3182
SF-36 PCS47.4±8.148.0±7.348.5±5.947.3±9.31.04±8.0–0.67±8.00.4430.5100

Scores of the baseline and follow-up tests are shown (mean±SD). Active: ACS group. Change: score at follow-up –score at baseline. Significance was determined by two-way repeated ANOVA (Time [baseline or follow-up]×Variant [ACS or placebo]), by utilizing GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc. La Jolla, CA. www.graphpad.com). The F(df1) and P value obtained after the interaction analysis (Time×Variant) are shown.  **p <  0.01 between the two groups without any adjustment. After age-adjustment, F(1) = 6.8588 and p = 0.0128 between the two groups.

Fig.3

Longitudinal change in score of WMS-LM2 between the two groups. Box plot of WMS-LM2 data described in Table 3. Each black dot represents the change of score in each volunteer. Active (n = 19), Placebo (n = 20). Solid bar shows median, and box shows 25–75 percentile. BL, Baseline; FU, Follow-up. We observed a significant improvement of WMS-LM2 score in the ACS group before (F[1,37] = 9.067, p = 0.0047), after adjusting for age (F[1] = 6.8588, p = 0.0128).

In the ADAScog test, the interaction Time×Variant was not significant (F[1,37] = 0.5000, p = 0.4839). There was no effect of time (F[1,37] = 0.2280, p = 0.6358) or of variant (F[1,37] = 0.005572, p = 0.9409). In the BDI test, the interaction Time×Variant was not significant (F[1,37] = 1.641, p = 0.2082). There was an effect of time (F[1,37] = 9.337, p = 0.0042), but not variant (F[1,37] = 0.005905, p = 0.8093). After the Bonferroni post-hoc test, we observed a significant decrease in the score in the ACS group (DF[37], t[3.028], p = 0.0089), but not in the placebo group (DF[37], t[1.271], p = 0.4231). In the MCS score from SF-36, the interaction Time×Variant was not significant (F[1,37] = 1.024, p = 0.3182). There was no effect of time (F[1,37] = 0.9854, p = 0.3273) or variant (F[1,37] = 1.234, p = 0.2737). In the PCS score from SF-36, the interaction Time×Variant was not significant (F[1,37] = 0.4426, p = 0.5100). There was no effect of time (F[1,37] = 0.02027, p = 0.8876) or variant (F[1,37] = 0.01733, p = 0.8960).

Cytokine and microarray analysis

Among 26 cytokines tested, three (CCL-2 (MCP-1), IL-8, and IL-5) showed significant decrease (FDR; p <  0.01) in the sera from ACS volunteers at thefollow-up (Fig. 4), and no cytokine was increased at the follow-up. In the placebo group, no significant changes were detected in any cytokines between the baseline and follow-up time points. All data (mean±SD) for the baseline and follow-up time points for the two groups are shown in Supplementary Table 2.
Fig.4

Significant decreases in inflammatory cytokines in the ACS Group. Of 26 cytokines tested, three (IL-8, CCL-2 (MCP-1), and IL-5) were significantly decreased (p <  0.01, after FDR) in the sera of the ACS group. No cytokines significantly decreased in the placebo group. Each black dot represents the concentration of cytokine in each volunteer at the indicated test. Active (n = 19), Placebo (n = 20). Red bar shows median, and red error bar shows 25–75 percentile. BL, Baseline; FU, Follow-up.

We performed a microarray analysis of the blood samples obtained from volunteers at the baseline and follow-up time points. For the analysis, we focused on the genes categorized as encoding ‘inflammatory related genes including soluble factors such as chemokines and cytokines’, which would be expected to affect nerve cells or cerebrovascular cells. Supplementary Figure 1 shows the changes in expression of ‘inflammatory related’ genes by microarray analysis, even if the significance level was below the multiple correction level. We also examined the gene expression levels for the 26 cytokines analyzed above, to evaluate changes between the baseline and follow-up time points in each patient, but we did not detect any significant differences in their gene expression levels in PBMCs (data not shown).

MRI analysis

Participants were evaluated by a perfusion MRI method, pulsed arterial spin labeling (pASL). To assess longitudinal brain perfusion changes induced by the supplementation, we compared 3D pASL data between the ACS and placebo groups, using the baseline and follow-up test data. Whole brain pASL data analysis revealed a tendency for brain perfusion preservation at the PCC area in the ACS group (Fig. 5), whereas the inverse calculation did not reveal any findings. By using a PCC ROI offered by the toolbox wfu_pickatlas in the SPM software, we observed a significant preservation of brain perfusion in the ACS group (p = 0.0228; Fig. 6), after adjusting for age (F[1] = 5.5051, p = 0.0248).
Fig.5

Analysis and location of longitudinal brain perfusion changes. Color indicates the brain region that showed a difference in brain perfusion changes between the two groups, after repeated two-way ANOVA, interaction Time×Variant (active >  placebo, p <  0.01, Voxel threshold >  500). Due to low image quality, we eliminated one individual from the ACS group; therefore, we compared 38 participants in the ACS (n = 18) and placebo (n = 20) groups. Inverse calculation showed no plot. The locations are plotted on a template human brain. Red arrows with PCC (BA29) shows a cluster of perfusion preservation after supplementation (Cluster Size: 797; Peak (x, y, z) = (–8, –58, 16) at Z-score of 3.51).

Fig.6

Longitudinal change in PCC perfusion change between the two groups. We used a PCC ROI defined by a public domain program for the SPM software: toolbox, wfu_pickatlas, and performed a ROI analysis. We observed a significant preservation of the brain perfusion of the PCC in the ACS group (p = 0.0228). After adjusting for age, we detected a significant difference between the two groups (F(1) = 5.5051, p = 0.0248).

Another set of RCT

To confirm whether ACS would preserve verbal memory in elderly people, we recruited healthy participants (60–80 years of age) and tested the WMS-LM2 test at the baseline and the 6-month follow-up. The group characteristics are summarized in Table 4. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, gender, body mass index, education, or MMSE score. For the WMS-LM2 test, we used story A for the baseline and the follow-up tests. Data were analyzed using a two-way repeated ANOVA (Time [baseline or 6-month follow-up]×Variant [ACS or placebo]). The interaction Time×Variant was significant before (F[1,82] = 5.509, p = 0.0213; Fig. 7), and afteradjusting for age (F[1] = 5.6125, p = 0.0202).
Table 4

Baseline characteristics of another RCT participants who completed 6 month-test

Active (42)Placebo (42)p
Age (mean±SD)69.4±5.970.4±5.70.43
Gender (M/F)19/2318/240.83
BMI22.9±2.722.3±2.70.29
Education (y)14.9±1.914.6±3.00.52
MMSE27.7±1.727.7±1.90.85

Significance was determined according to Student t-test, and chi-square test (for gender).

Fig.7

Longitudinal change in score of WMS-LM2 between the two groups in another RCT. Each black dot represents the change of score in each volunteer between the baseline score and the 6 month follow-up score. Active (n = 42), Placebo (n = 42). Solid bar shows median, and box shows 25–75 percentile. BL, Baseline; FU, 6 Month Follow-up. We observed a significant improvement of WMS-LM2 score in the ACS group before (F[1,82] = 5.509, p = 0.0213), and after adjusting for age (F[1] = 5.6125, p = 0.0202).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we detected a significant preservation of verbal episodic memory function in healthy elderly people treated with an anserine/carnosine supplement in the two separate tests. Using a WMS-LM test to evaluate cognitive function [11, 31], we obtained significant results in the delayed recall (WMS-LM2) test, but not in the immediate recall (WMS-LM1) test, suggesting that ACS may have a beneficial effect on verbal memory registration, but not on short-term working verbal memory. We also applied a set of psychological tests and health questionnaires, including the ADAScog, BDI, and SF-36 (both mental and physiological domains), to evaluate the effect of ACS on the cognitive and mental functions of the elderlyvolunteers, as we expected we did not detect any significant differences between the ACS and placebo groups. We assessed the effect of the supplementation on cognitive function using the data from all of the volunteers (age 41–78 years), but we did not detect any significant differences between the ACS and placebo group (data not shown). Given that the delayed-recall tests of verbal memory, such as the WMS-LM delayed recall (WMS-LM2) test or the free and cue selective reminding test (FCSRT) [32-34], are considered a sensitive battery for detecting a cognitive decline of elderly people, our findings indicate that ACS may inhibit a cognitive decline, as detected by the verbal memory test. In line with our data, Szcześniak et al. [9] also suggested that ACS inhibits the decline in delayed recall, but not immediate recall, of memory in elderly people, as assessed using the STMS test [32]. To evaluate brain perfusion, especially in the PCC region, where an age-dependent decline in perfusion is reported to occur [12, 35, 36], we used a perfusion MRI method, 3D-pulsed ASL, with a FAIR labeling scheme [37] and a post-label delay time of 2350 ms. With this long delay time, capillary components rather than artery components contribute to the signal, according to the model proposed by Li et al. [38]. Given this background, we examined the level of inflammatory cytokines in serum, which may reflect atherosclerotic changes in the body’s cardiovascular system. We detected significant decreases in theconcentrations of IL8 and CCL2 in the ACS group after supplementation, in agreement with our previous finding that carnosine treatment decreases the production of IL8 in TNF-treated cells [39]. CCL2 is upregulated during inflammation and can disrupt the integrity of the brain-blood barrier [40]. Our microarray analysis of the blood cells from the volunteers did not reveal any decline in the gene expression levels of inflammatory cytokines, suggesting that the decrease in the blood concentration of IL8 and CCL2 may have resulted from regulation at the cardiovascular cells, such as endothelial cells or smooth muscle cells, rather than at the blood cells. To explore alternative scenarios for the effect of ACS on verbal episodic memory learning as assessed by the WMS-LM2 delayed recall, we performed a number of MRI scans, including VBM and DTI. Although previous studies showed a correlation of the verbal episodic memory score with a decline in hippocampal volume [41, 42] or with white matter microstructural change [43], we did not observe any significant difference in these brain structures between the two groups. Taken together, it is reasonable to speculate that ACS has a preservative effect against a cognitive decline through its ability to suppress neurovascular damage. How ACS suppresses neurovascular damage and maintains brain blood flow is still unknown. In humans, the concentration of carnosine and its derivatives, such as anserine, is high in muscle tissues, in the milimolar range [6, 44, 45]. In our immunoassay, we detected a decrease in the serum concentration of inflammatory cytokines, but we did not detect a change in their gene expression level in PBMCs, suggesting that the difference emerged, not from blood cells, but from cardiovascular cells, such as pericytes. Recently, Zlokovic and his colleagues elegantly demonstrated the role of brain blood vessel pericytes in enabling brain micro-capillaries to maintain brain blood flow and suggested that pericyte degeneration contributes to the etiology of AD [46, 47]. It can be speculated that ingested anserine and carnosine are taken up by the pericytes of brain microcapillaries, where they inhibit degenerative cellular changes; however, further studies are required to determine the precise mechanisms by which ACS affects brain function. Our study has various limitations. The sample size was limited, and represented an age-based subgroup analysis from a larger original group that included data from younger subjects. To confirm main effect of ACS on verbal memory, we added an interim data from another RCT in this communication. In this study, we used a mixture of anserine and carnosine from chicken meat extract, which also contained a small amount of creatinine that induced a transient increase in the blood creatinine level. Anserine and carnosine were also ingested through the subjects’ normal diet. In this study, we tried to estimate the participants’ dietary intake of anserine and carnosine by using a questionnaire. Although the survey results indicated that the anserine and carnosine consumption from the diet was equivalent between the ACS and placebo groups in our study, a better method is needed to estimate their levels more accurately. Click here for additional data file.
  40 in total

1.  Four-phase single-capillary stepwise model for kinetics in arterial spin labeling MRI.

Authors:  Ka-loh Li; Xiaoping Zhu; Nola Hylton; Geon-Ho Jahng; Michael W Weiner; Norbert Schuff
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Entorhinal cortex volume measured with 3T MRI is positively correlated with the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised logical/verbal memory score for healthy subjects.

Authors:  Masami Goto; Osamu Abe; Tosiaki Miyati; Takeharu Yoshikawa; Naoto Hayashi; Hidemasa Takao; Sachiko Inano; Hiroyuki Kabasawa; Harushi Mori; Akira Kunimatsu; Shigeki Aoki; Kenji Ino; Kyouhito Iida; Keiichi Yano; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Free and cued selective reminding identifies very mild dementia in primary care.

Authors:  Ellen Grober; Amy E Sanders; Charles Hall; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.703

4.  The Alzheimer's disease assessment scale: an instrument for assessing treatment efficacy.

Authors:  R C Mohs; W G Rosen; K L Davis
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1983

Review 5.  Carnosine and related substances in animal tissues.

Authors:  K G Crush
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol       Date:  1970-05-01

6.  Arterial spin labeling may contribute to the prediction of cognitive deterioration in healthy elderly individuals.

Authors:  Aikaterini Xekardaki; Cristelle Rodriguez; Marie-Louise Montandon; Simona Toma; Eline Tombeur; François R Herrmann; Dina Zekry; Karl-Olof Lovblad; Frederik Barkhof; Panteleimon Giannakopoulos; Sven Haller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Anserine and carnosine supplementation in the elderly: Effects on cognitive functioning and physical capacity.

Authors:  D Szcześniak; S Budzeń; W Kopeć; J Rymaszewska
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 8.  Could carnosine or related structures suppress Alzheimer's disease?

Authors:  Alan R Hipkiss
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 9.  Physiology and pathophysiology of carnosine.

Authors:  Alexander A Boldyrev; Giancarlo Aldini; Wim Derave
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 37.312

10.  Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus.

Authors:  Axel Montagne; Samuel R Barnes; Melanie D Sweeney; Matthew R Halliday; Abhay P Sagare; Zhen Zhao; Arthur W Toga; Russell E Jacobs; Collin Y Liu; Lilyana Amezcua; Michael G Harrington; Helena C Chui; Meng Law; Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  27 in total

1.  Carnosine activates the CREB pathway in Caco-2 cells.

Authors:  Kaoru Fujii; Kayoko Abe; Keishi Kadooka; Takashi Matsumoto; Yoshinori Katakura
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 2.  Glycotoxins: Dietary and Metabolic Origins; Possible Amelioration of Neurotoxicity by Carnosine, with Special Reference to Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Alan R Hipkiss
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.911

Review 3.  Influence of Histidine Administration on Ammonia and Amino Acid Metabolism: A Review.

Authors:  M Holeček
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 1.881

4.  Consumption of Oleic Acid on the Preservation of Cognitive Functions in Japanese Elderly Individuals.

Authors:  Keisuke Sakurai; Chutong Shen; Izumi Shiraishi; Noriko Inamura; Tatsuhiro Hisatsune
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Anserine/Carnosine Supplementation Suppresses the Expression of the Inflammatory Chemokine CCL24 in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Elderly People.

Authors:  Yoshinori Katakura; Mamoru Totsuka; Etsuko Imabayashi; Hiroshi Matsuda; Tatsuhiro Hisatsune
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Depression, Diabetes and Dementia: Formaldehyde May Be a Common Causal Agent; Could Carnosine, a Pluripotent Peptide, Be Protective?

Authors:  Alan R Hipkiss
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.745

7.  Anserine (beta-alanyl-3-methyl-L-histidine) improves neurovascular-unit dysfunction and spatial memory in aged AβPPswe/PSEN1dE9 Alzheimer's-model mice.

Authors:  Jun Kaneko; Akiko Enya; Kota Enomoto; Qiong Ding; Tatsuhiro Hisatsune
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Zinc, Carnosine, and Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Masahiro Kawahara; Ken-Ichiro Tanaka; Midori Kato-Negishi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Does supplementation with carnosine improve cardiometabolic health and cognitive function in patients with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes? study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Estifanos Baye; Kirthi Menon; Maximilian Pj de Courten; Arul Earnest; James Cameron; Barbora de Courten
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Anserine/Carnosine Supplementation Preserves Blood Flow in the Prefrontal Brain of Elderly People Carrying APOE e4.

Authors:  Qiong Ding; Kitora Tanigawa; Jun Kaneko; Mamoru Totsuka; Yoshinori Katakura; Etsuko Imabayashi; Hiroshi Matsuda; Tatsuhiro Hisatsune
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.