INTRODUCTION: Previous studies revealed a correlation between local brain volume and cognitive function. The aim of the present study was to investigate the correlation between local gray matter volume and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) logical/verbal memory (WMS-R-verbal) score in healthy adults using a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance scanner and voxel-based morphometry (VBM). METHODS: T1-weighted magnetic resonance images were obtained in 1,169 healthy adults. The T1-weighted images in native space were bias-corrected, spatially normalized, and segmented into gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid images with Statistical Parametric Mapping 5. To investigate regionally the specific effects of the WMS-R-verbal score on the gray matter images, simple regression analysis was performed by VBM treating age, total intracranial volume, and gender as confounding covariates. A P value of less than 0.05 corrected with false discovery rate in voxel difference was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Our study showed a significant positive correlation between the WMS-R-verbal score and the bilateral entorhinal cortex volume. In the right entorhinal, T value is 4.75, and the size of the clusters is 155 voxels. In the left entorhinal, T value is 4.08, and the size of the clusters is 23 voxels. A significant negative correlation was not found. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first VBM study showing that entorhinal cortex volume is positively correlated with the WMS-R-verbal score for healthy subjects. Therefore, in our structural neuroimaging study, we add evidence to the hypothesis that the entorhinal cortex is involved in verbal memory processing.
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies revealed a correlation between local brain volume and cognitive function. The aim of the present study was to investigate the correlation between local gray matter volume and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) logical/verbal memory (WMS-R-verbal) score in healthy adults using a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance scanner and voxel-based morphometry (VBM). METHODS: T1-weighted magnetic resonance images were obtained in 1,169 healthy adults. The T1-weighted images in native space were bias-corrected, spatially normalized, and segmented into gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid images with Statistical Parametric Mapping 5. To investigate regionally the specific effects of the WMS-R-verbal score on the gray matter images, simple regression analysis was performed by VBM treating age, total intracranial volume, and gender as confounding covariates. A P value of less than 0.05 corrected with false discovery rate in voxel difference was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Our study showed a significant positive correlation between the WMS-R-verbal score and the bilateral entorhinal cortex volume. In the right entorhinal, T value is 4.75, and the size of the clusters is 155 voxels. In the left entorhinal, T value is 4.08, and the size of the clusters is 23 voxels. A significant negative correlation was not found. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first VBM study showing that entorhinal cortex volume is positively correlated with the WMS-R-verbal score for healthy subjects. Therefore, in our structural neuroimaging study, we add evidence to the hypothesis that the entorhinal cortex is involved in verbal memory processing.
Authors: A Pfefferbaum; K O Lim; R B Zipursky; D H Mathalon; M J Rosenbloom; B Lane; C N Ha; E V Sullivan Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 1992-12 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: C E Coffey; W E Wilkinson; I A Parashos; S A Soady; R J Sullivan; L J Patterson; G S Figiel; M C Webb; C E Spritzer; W T Djang Journal: Neurology Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Gail Musen; In Kyoon Lyoo; Caitlin R Sparks; Katie Weinger; Jaeuk Hwang; Christopher M Ryan; David C Jimerson; John Hennen; Perry F Renshaw; Alan M Jacobson Journal: Diabetes Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Liana G Apostolova; Jonathan H Morra; Amity E Green; Kristy S Hwang; Christina Avedissian; Ellen Woo; Jeffrey L Cummings; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kwangsik Nho; Shannon L Risacher; Paul K Crane; Charles DeCarli; M Maria Glymour; Christian Habeck; Sungeun Kim; Grace J Lee; Elizabeth Mormino; Shubhabrata Mukherjee; Li Shen; John D West; Andrew J Saykin Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Catherine C Price; Jared J Tanner; Ilona Schmalfuss; Cynthia Wilson Garvan; Peter Gearen; David Dickey; Kenneth Heilman; David L McDonagh; David J Libon; Christiana Leonard; Dawn Bowers; Terri G Monk Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 7.892