Gea A Holtman1, Yvonne Lisman-van Leeuwen1, Johannes B Reitsma2, Marjolein Y Berger3. 1. Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; and. 2. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 3. Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; and m.y.berger@umcg.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often nonspecific and overlaps with functional gastrointestinal disorders. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms, signs, noninvasive tests, and test combinations that can assist the clinician with the diagnosis of IBD in symptomatic children. METHODS: A literature search was conducted of Medline and Embase. Two reviewers independently selected studies reporting on the diagnostic accuracy of tests for IBD, with confirmation by endoscopy and histopathology or clinical follow-up, in children with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality with the QUADAS-2, an evidence-based quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included (N = 2806). Symptoms (abdominal pain, diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and weight loss) had pooled sensitivities ranging from 0.48 to 0.82 and specificities ranging from 0.17 to 0.78. Of all the blood markers, C-reactive protein (CRP) (9 studies) and albumin (6 studies) had the best performance, with pooled sensitivities of 0.63 (0.51-0.73) and 0.48 (0.31-0.66), respectively, and specificities of 0.88 (0.80-0.93) and 0.94 (0.86-0.98). Assessment of fecal calprotectin (FCal) (10 studies) had a pooled sensitivity of 0.99 (0.92-1.00) and a specificity of 0.65 (0.54-0.74). One limitation was that none of the studies was conducted in nonreferred children. CONCLUSIONS: In children whose pediatrician is considering an endoscopy, symptoms are not accurate enough to identify low-risk patients in whom an endoscopy can be avoided. FCal, CRP, and albumin findings are potentially of clinical value, given their ability to select children at low risk (negative FCal test result) or high risk (positive CRP or albumin test result) for IBD.
BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often nonspecific and overlaps with functional gastrointestinal disorders. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms, signs, noninvasive tests, and test combinations that can assist the clinician with the diagnosis of IBD in symptomatic children. METHODS: A literature search was conducted of Medline and Embase. Two reviewers independently selected studies reporting on the diagnostic accuracy of tests for IBD, with confirmation by endoscopy and histopathology or clinical follow-up, in children with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality with the QUADAS-2, an evidence-based quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included (N = 2806). Symptoms (abdominal pain, diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and weight loss) had pooled sensitivities ranging from 0.48 to 0.82 and specificities ranging from 0.17 to 0.78. Of all the blood markers, C-reactive protein (CRP) (9 studies) and albumin (6 studies) had the best performance, with pooled sensitivities of 0.63 (0.51-0.73) and 0.48 (0.31-0.66), respectively, and specificities of 0.88 (0.80-0.93) and 0.94 (0.86-0.98). Assessment of fecal calprotectin (FCal) (10 studies) had a pooled sensitivity of 0.99 (0.92-1.00) and a specificity of 0.65 (0.54-0.74). One limitation was that none of the studies was conducted in nonreferred children. CONCLUSIONS: In children whose pediatrician is considering an endoscopy, symptoms are not accurate enough to identify low-risk patients in whom an endoscopy can be avoided. FCal, CRP, and albumin findings are potentially of clinical value, given their ability to select children at low risk (negative FCal test result) or high risk (positive CRP or albumin test result) for IBD.
Authors: Gea A Holtman; Yvonne Lisman-van Leeuwen; Boudewijn J Kollen; Obbe F Norbruis; Johanna C Escher; Angelika Kindermann; Yolanda B de Rijke; Patrick F van Rheenen; Marjolein Y Berger Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Gea A Holtman; Yvonne Lisman-van Leeuwen; Andrew S Day; Ulrika L Fagerberg; Paul Henderson; Stevan T Leach; Gøri Perminow; David Mack; Patrick F van Rheenen; Els van de Vijver; David C Wilson; Johannes B Reitsma; Marjolein Y Berger Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 26.796
Authors: Allison Ross Eckard; Heather Y Hughes; Nancy L Hagood; Mary Ann O'Riordan; Danielle Labbato; Julia C Kosco; Sarah E Scott; Grace A McComsey Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 3.771
Authors: Cristiane C Otoni; Romy M Heilmann; Mercedes García-Sancho; Angel Sainz; Mark R Ackermann; Jan S Suchodolski; Jörg M Steiner; Albert E Jergens Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Anke Heida; Els Van de Vijver; Don van Ravenzwaaij; Stephanie Van Biervliet; Thalia Z Hummel; Zehre Yuksel; Gieneke Gonera-de Jong; Renate Schulenberg; Anneke Muller Kobold; Patrick Ferry van Rheenen Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Gea A Holtman; Yvonne Lisman-van Leeuwen; Boudewijn J Kollen; Obbe F Norbruis; Johanna C Escher; Laurence C Walhout; Angelika Kindermann; Yolanda B de Rijke; Patrick F van Rheenen; Marjolein Y Berger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-06 Impact factor: 3.240