Literature DB >> 26680607

Hypomorphic function and somatic reversion of DOCK8 cause combined immunodeficiency without hyper-IgE.

Anne-Kathrin Kienzler1, Pauline A van Schouwenburg2, John Taylor3, Ishita Marwah2, Richa U Sharma2, Charlotte Noakes3, Kate Thomson3, Ross Sadler4, Shelley Segal5, Berne Ferry4, Jenny C Taylor6, Edward Blair7, Helen Chapel2, Smita Y Patel2.   

Abstract

Loss-of-function mutations in DOCK8 are linked to hyper-IgE syndrome. Patients typically present with recurrent sinopulmonary infections, severe cutaneous viral infections, food allergies and elevated serum IgE. Although patients may present with a spectrum of disease-related symptoms, molecular mechanisms explaining phenotypic variability in patients are poorly defined. Here we characterized a novel compound heterozygous mutation in DOCK8 in a patient diagnosed with primary combined immunodeficiency which was not typical of classical DOCK8 deficiency. In contrast to previously identified mutations in DOCK8 which result in complete loss of function, the newly identified single nucleotide insertion results in expression of a truncated DOCK8 protein. Functional evaluation of the truncated DOCK8 protein revealed its hypomorphic function. In addition we found somatic reversion of DOCK8 predominantly in T cells. The combination of somatic reversion and hypomorphic DOCK8 function explains the milder and atypical phenotype of the patient and further broadens the spectrum of DOCK8-associated disease.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combined immunodeficiency; DOCK8; Hyper-IgE syndrome; Phenotypic variability; Whole exome sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26680607      PMCID: PMC4758821          DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2015.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Immunol        ISSN: 1521-6616            Impact factor:   3.969


Introduction

Bi-allelic loss-of-function mutations in the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) cause autosomal recessive hyper-IgE syndrome. The vast majority of DOCK8-deficient patients present with combined immunodeficiency characterized by recurrent sino-pulmonary and/or gastrointestinal infections, severe cutaneous viral infections, severe atopy, eosinophilia and massively elevated serum IgE levels. Patients also have a predisposition to cancer [1], [2]. Recent studies have highlighted the phenotypic variability of patients suffering from DOCK8-deficiency [3], [4]. Patients with susceptibility to infection but less severe allergic disease were identified to carry a functional wild-type DOCK8 allele in lymphocyte subpopulations due to somatic reversion of the mutated DOCK8 alleles [3]. Here we report for the first time a patient with a hypomorphic mutation in DOCK8 presenting with recurrent bacterial infections, low serum IgM and IgG, CD4 lymphopenia and severely impaired vaccination responses, but without severe viral infections and severe atopy.

Methods

Detailed information can be found in the Supplementary data. We submitted the variants identified in DOCK8 to be made publically available by ClinVar (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/). The accession numbers are SCV000257461 (deletion chr9:204193-343954), SCV000257462 (c.65C>T), SCV000257463 (c.289C>A), SCV000257464 (c4107C>G), SCV000257465 (c.5433G>A), and SCV000257466 (c.6019dupT).

Case presentation

The female patient is the only child of non-consanguineous, healthy parents. She presented aged eight with a two-year history of recurrent bacterial chest infections and radiological signs of early bronchiectasis. The patient also had a long-standing history of mild eczema and asthma requiring treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and beta-agonists. All routine childhood immunizations were received uneventfully. Immunological evaluation (Table 1) revealed low serum IgM, normal IgA and IgE, and borderline-low IgG levels which dropped significantly over 12 months. Measurement of responses to previous immunizations demonstrated protective levels of IgG to tetanus toxoid but absent IgG to Haemophilus influenzae type b, pneumococcal polysaccharides and measles. Also, despite a history of a normal course of chicken-pox, varicella zoster virus IgG was undetectable. Lymphocyte subset analysis demonstrated low CD4+ T cell numbers and low frequencies of CD27+ effector B cells (Table 1). Following the failure of antibiotic prophylaxis alone to reduce the infection burden, immunoglobulin replacement therapy was commenced with a good clinical response. Sequence analysis of recombination-activating gene (RAG) 1, RAG2, and DNA cross-link repair 1C (DCLRE1C encoding Artemis) did not reveal any mutations. Therefore the patient was given a diagnosis of undefined primary combined immunodeficiency.
Table 1

Immunological characteristics of the patient.

ParameterPatientNormal range
Serum immunoglobulin
IgM (g/L)0.230.4–2.5
IgG (g/L)N/(↓)a7.046.0–13.0
IgA (g/L)N2.750.8–3.0
IgEb (kU/L)N190< 380



Leukocyte count (no./μL) and phenotype (%)
Lymphocytes (/μL)N11701000–5300
CD19+ B cells
 CD19+ (/μL)N530200–600
 CD38++ IgM++ transitional (%)14.24.6–8.3c
 CD27 IgD+ naive (%)9147.3–77.0c
 CD27+ IgD+ natural effector (%)3.445.2–20.4c
 CD27+ IgD switched memory (%)1.1210.9–30.4c
CD3+ T cells
 CD3+ (/μL)570800–3500
 CD4+ (/μL)180400–2100
 CD4+ CD45RA+ naïve (%)3946–77d
 CD4+ CD45RO+ memory (%)61.113–30d
 CD4+ CD45RA+ CD31+ RTE (%)32.542–74d
 CD8+ (/μL)N280200–1200
 CD8+ CD45RA+ naïve (%)41.463–92d
 CD8+ CD45RO+ memory (%)58.64–21d
CD16+ CD56+ NK cells (/μL)N8070–1200
Eosinophils (/μL)1150< 350
TRECs (/106 MNC)1197> 10,000
Specific IgG responses
 Tetanus toxoid (IU/ml)N0.03> 0.01
 Haemophilus influenzae type b (μg/ml)< 0.150.15–1.0
 Pneumococcal polysaccharides (U/ml)1> 14
 MeaslesAbsent
 Varicella zosterAbsent
T cell proliferation
 PHA↓↓ absent at 10 years of age ↓ decreased at 15 years of age

N, value within normal range; ↑, value above normal range; ↓, value below normal range; RTE, recent thymic emigrants; TREC, T cell receptor rearrangement excision circle; PHA, phytohemagglutinin.

Serum IgG dropped within a year after initial presentation.

Serum IgE was measured after identification of the DOCK8 mutation on serum samples frozen before start of immunoglobulin replacement therapy.

5–95 percentile range for age-matched controls adopted from [7].

10–90 percentile range for age-matched controls adopted from [8].

Results and discussion

To identify the underlying disease cause, we undertook whole exome sequencing (WES) on the patient and both parents. A novel heterozygous frameshift variant was detected in DOCK8 in the patient and her mother. Sanger sequencing confirmed a single-nucleotide duplication [c.6019dupT (p.Tyr2007Leufs*12)] within the conserved DOCK homology region 2 (DHR2) domain of DOCK8, leading to a frameshift and premature stop-codon (Fig. 1, A and C, and Supplementary Table 1]. As autosomal recessive mutations in DOCK8 cause combined immunodeficiency, we screened for further variants in DOCK8. Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across DOCK8 in the trio revealed apparent loss of paternal contribution of two SNPs in a 5′ region of the gene (Supplementary Table 1), indicating the possibility of a paternally inherited deletion. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis confirmed a large deletion encompassing exons 1–14 of DOCK8 in the patient and her father (approx. 140 kb deletion of 9p24.3, base pair 204,193 to 343,954) (Fig. 1, B and C). This novel compound heterozygous mutation in DOCK8 was the only disease-causing variant identified in the patient (Supplementary Tables 2–4).
Fig. 1

A novel compound heterozygous mutation in DOCK8 results in expression of a truncated DOCK8 protein. (A) Sanger sequencing results for the single nucleotide duplication, c.6019dupT, p.(Tyr2007Leufs*12). The upper panel illustrates a normal control trace and the lower panel shows the presence of the mutation; the duplicated T nucleotide is indicated by the arrow. (B) Results of array comparative genomic hybridization illustrating the about 140 kb deletion in 9p24.3 (204,193–343,954). The deletion encompasses exons 1–14 of DOCK8. (C) Graphic depicting the wild-type DOCK8 protein structure and the outcome of the single-nucleotide insertion on the maternal allele and the deletion in DOCK8 on the paternal allele on DOCK8 protein expression (DOCK8 transcript reference is ENST00000453981). (D) DOCK8 protein expression in EBV-transformed B cells of a healthy control (7.5 μg protein lysate) and the patient (30 μg protein lysate). Actin was used as loading control.

The deletion in DOCK8 is predicted to result in the absence of any protein expression since the deletion includes the start codon. The frameshift mutation is predicted to result in the production of a truncated protein lacking 81 amino acids (~ 11 kDa). Indeed, patient EBV cells expressed low amounts of a truncated DOCK8 protein, but not the full-length protein (Fig. 1D). We hypothesized that this truncated DOCK8 protein has hypomorphic function accounting for the milder clinical presentation of our patient. Previous studies of DOCK8-deficient patients report impaired T cell proliferation [1], [2]. At the age of ten years, both CD4+ and CD8+ patient T cells did not proliferate in response to mitogen (PHA) stimulation (Fig. 2A), consistent with an inability of the truncated DOCK8 protein to transmit proliferative signals. Interestingly, when studying T cell proliferation at the time of WES (four years later), proliferation of both CD4+ and CD8+ patient T cells was present, although reduced compared to a healthy control (Fig. 2B). We hypothesized that this difference in T cell proliferation could be explained by somatic reversion of DOCK8. Indeed, Sanger sequencing of DOCK8 cDNA of T cells and subsequent peak height quantification revealed that two thirds of all DOCK8 transcripts are wild-type (Fig. 2C), showing somatic reversion of DOCK8 as previously described [3]. Somatic reversion of DOCK8 in T cells was confirmed by pyrosequencing of DOCK8 (Fig. 2D). Therefore improved T cell proliferation over time is likely to be due to somatic reversion of DOCK8 in patient T cells.
Fig. 2

Improvement of T cell proliferation over time, somatic reversion of DOCK8 in T cells and hypomorphic function of the truncated DOCK8 protein. Proliferation of PHA-stimulated, CFSE-labeled PBMCs of the patient at (A) 10 and (B) 15 years of age, and a healthy control. Depicted are percentages of CFSElow cells gated on CD3+ CD4+ or CD4− or CD8+ T cells. (C) Sanger sequence trace showing somatic reversion of the single nucleotide duplication (c.6019dupT) resulting in expression of about 60% wild-type DOCK8 transcripts in the patient's CD3+ T cells. (D) “T” nucleotide phosphorescence ratios obtained by pyrosequencing DOCK8 of primary CD3+ CD4+ and CD3+ CD8+ T cells, primary CD19+ B cells and the EBV B cell line of the patient. (T/± 1 or 2) depicts the signal ratio of c.6018-19T to nucleotides 1 and 2 positions up and downstream. The PCR templates and pyrosequencing reactions were performed in triplicate. Each symbol represents the mean of the three ratio measurements at respective nucleotide positions. The bar represents the mean “T” nucleotide phosphorescence ratio of all 4 different nucleotide ratios in indicated cell populations. (E) Sanger sequence trace showing expression of solely mutated DOCK8 transcripts in EBV-transformed B cells of the patient. The duplicated T-nucleotide is indicated by the arrow and #. (F) Migration of EBV-transformed B cells of 5 different healthy controls (each symbol represents the mean of 3 independent experiments for each of the healthy control samples), the patient and a patient with a complete loss-of-function mutation in DOCK8 (DOCK8null). The bar of the healthy control samples represents the mean of the mean of each of the 5 healthy control samples. The bar for each of the patient samples represents mean and standard deviation of 3 independent experiments for each sample.

The frequency of somatic reversion in B cells was half compared to the DOCK8 reversion in T cells (Fig. 2D) indicating a higher proportion of B cells expressing only the truncated DOCK8. Interestingly, patient CD19+ B cells immortalized with EBV expressed only mutated DOCK8 transcripts (Fig. 2E) suggesting selective outgrowth of cells that did not undergo somatic reversion. As migration of DOCK8-deficient B cells has previously been shown to be impaired [5], we investigated the functionality of the truncated DOCK8 protein in a transwell assay using the patient EBV B cells expressing only the truncated version of DOCK8. Migration of patient EBV B cells was comparable to the EBV B cell lines of healthy controls and significantly better than that of EBV B cells of a patient with complete loss-of-function mutation in DOCK8 (DOCK8null) (Fig. 2F). This shows that migration was not significantly affected by the truncation of the DOCK8 protein. DOCK8 is a large protein with at least two described functional domains, the N-terminal DOCK homology region (DHR) 1 domain and the C-terminal DHR2 domain. There is only little data available on which downstream cellular functions are mediated by each domain. Our data showing normal migration of patient EBV cells expressing a truncated DOCK8 protein in which the C-terminal DHR2 domain is disrupted suggest that this domain is dispensable for lymphocyte migration. In line, Ham et al. [6] showed that the N-terminal region of DOCK8, but not the C-terminal region of DOCK8 is a crucial binding site for Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp), a protein involved in actin cytoskeleton remodeling and migration. The C-terminal DHR2 domain of DOCK8 exhibits the guanine nucleotide exchange in the small GTPase cell division control protein 42 homolog (CDC42). To our knowledge it is not yet clear which cellular functions are modulated by signaling events initiated by the DOCK8-mediated guanine nucleotide exchange. Absent T cell proliferation when the patient presented initially in clinic, presumably before somatic reversion took place, suggests that lymphocyte proliferation is likely modulated by the guanine nucleotide exchange function in the DHR2 domain. Further in-depth characterization of truncated DOCK8 proteins will provide a valuable tool for gaining a better understanding of the function of DOCK8 in immune regulation and genotype–phenotype correlations in various patients with DOCK8 deficiencies. Currently, curative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the definitive treatment for DOCK8 deficiency. Without HSCT, infections and an increased risk of developing malignancies due to impaired clearance of oncogenic viruses are life-threatening complications associated with DOCK8 deficiency. HSCT is expected to prevent both; however there is no data available on the development of malignancies post-HSCT. In our patient, expression of truncated, partially functional DOCK8 in combination with somatic reversion in T cells is sufficient to maintain antiviral immunity, as shown by the absence of severe viral infections. Therefore, the risk versus benefit of HSCT is unclear in patients with less severe disease and demands careful consideration.

Conclusion

Here we reported a patient with atypical DOCK8 deficiency characterized by a much milder phenotype of the immunodeficiency compared to classical DOCK8 deficiency which further broadens the spectrum of DOCK8 associated diseases. As suggested by normal patient EBV B cell migration and initially absent T cell proliferation in addition to somatic reversion of DOCK8 predominantly in T cells, this relatively mild phenotype is the result of hypomorphic DOCK8 function and somatic reversion.

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any potential financial conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Oxford Partnership Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre with funding from the Department of Health's National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) (IS-BRC-0211-10025) Biomedical Research Centre funding scheme. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Health. B.F. was supported by the NIHR Chief Scientist Funding.
  8 in total

1.  B cell subsets in healthy children: reference values for evaluation of B cell maturation process in peripheral blood.

Authors:  Barbara Piątosa; Beata Wolska-Kuśnierz; Małgorzata Pac; Katarzyna Siewiera; Ewa Gałkowska; Ewa Bernatowska
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.058

2.  A case of partial dedicator of cytokinesis 8 deficiency with altered effector phenotype and impaired CD8⁺ and natural killer cell cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Raquel Ruiz-García; Sara Lermo-Rojo; Luis Martínez-Lostao; Esther Mancebo; Sergio Mora-Díaz; Estela Paz-Artal; Jesús Ruiz-Contreras; Alberto Anel; Luis I González-Granado; Luis M Allende
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors control B-cell migration through signaling components associated with primary immunodeficiencies, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Heiko Sic; Helene Kraus; Josef Madl; Karl-Andreas Flittner; Audrey Lilly von Münchow; Kathrin Pieper; Marta Rizzi; Anne-Kathrin Kienzler; Korcan Ayata; Sebastian Rauer; Burkhard Kleuser; Ulrich Salzer; Meike Burger; Katja Zirlik; Vassilios Lougaris; Alessandro Plebani; Winfried Römer; Christoph Loeffler; Samantha Scaramuzza; Anna Villa; Emiko Noguchi; Bodo Grimbacher; Hermann Eibel
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Somatic reversion in dedicator of cytokinesis 8 immunodeficiency modulates disease phenotype.

Authors:  Huie Jing; Qian Zhang; Yu Zhang; Brenna J Hill; Christopher G Dove; Erwin W Gelfand; T Prescott Atkinson; Gulbu Uzel; Helen F Matthews; Peter J Mustillo; David B Lewis; Fotini D Kavadas; I Celine Hanson; Ashish R Kumar; Raif S Geha; Daniel C Douek; Steven M Holland; Alexandra F Freeman; Helen C Su
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Large deletions and point mutations involving the dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) in the autosomal-recessive form of hyper-IgE syndrome.

Authors:  Karin R Engelhardt; Sean McGhee; Sabine Winkler; Atfa Sassi; Cristina Woellner; Gabriela Lopez-Herrera; Andrew Chen; Hong Sook Kim; Maria Garcia Lloret; Ilka Schulze; Stephan Ehl; Jens Thiel; Dietmar Pfeifer; Hendrik Veelken; Tim Niehues; Kathrin Siepermann; Sebastian Weinspach; Ismail Reisli; Sevgi Keles; Ferah Genel; Necil Kutukculer; Necil Kutuculer; Yildiz Camcioğlu; Ayper Somer; Elif Karakoc-Aydiner; Isil Barlan; Andrew Gennery; Ayse Metin; Aydan Degerliyurt; Maria C Pietrogrande; Mehdi Yeganeh; Zeina Baz; Salem Al-Tamemi; Christoph Klein; Jennifer M Puck; Steven M Holland; Edward R B McCabe; Bodo Grimbacher; Talal A Chatila
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  Combined immunodeficiency associated with DOCK8 mutations.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Jeremiah C Davis; Ian T Lamborn; Alexandra F Freeman; Huie Jing; Amanda J Favreau; Helen F Matthews; Joie Davis; Maria L Turner; Gulbu Uzel; Steven M Holland; Helen C Su
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Dedicator of cytokinesis 8 interacts with talin and Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein to regulate NK cell cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Hyoungjun Ham; Sabrice Guerrier; JungJin Kim; Renee A Schoon; Erik L Anderson; Michael J Hamann; Zhenkun Lou; Daniel D Billadeau
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Lymphocyte subsets in healthy children from birth through 18 years of age: the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group P1009 study.

Authors:  William T Shearer; Howard M Rosenblatt; Rebecca S Gelman; Rebecca Oyomopito; Susan Plaeger; E Richard Stiehm; Diane W Wara; Steven D Douglas; Katherine Luzuriaga; Elizabeth J McFarland; Ram Yogev; Mobeen H Rathore; Wende Levy; Bobbie L Graham; Stephen A Spector
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.793

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  An expanding network of cytoskeletal defects.

Authors:  Michael D Keller
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  DOCK8 deficiency: Insights into pathophysiology, clinical features and management.

Authors:  Catherine M Biggs; Sevgi Keles; Talal A Chatila
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Interstitial lung disease in patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders: several different pathologies?

Authors:  S Patel; C Anzilotti; M Lucas; N Moore; H Chapel
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Recent Advances in DOCK8 Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Huie Jing; Helen C Su
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 5.  Somatic genetic rescue in Mendelian haematopoietic diseases.

Authors:  Patrick Revy; Caroline Kannengiesser; Alain Fischer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Somatic alterations compromised molecular diagnosis of DOCK8 hyper-IgE syndrome caused by a novel intronic splice site mutation.

Authors:  Beate Hagl; Benedikt D Spielberger; Silvia Thoene; Sophie Bonnal; Christian Mertes; Christof Winter; Isaac J Nijman; Shira Verduin; Andreas C Eberherr; Anne Puel; Detlev Schindler; Jürgen Ruland; Thomas Meitinger; Julien Gagneur; Jordan S Orange; Marielle E van Gijn; Ellen D Renner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Allele-Specific Prevention of Nonsense-Mediated Decay in Cystic Fibrosis Using Homology-Independent Genome Editing.

Authors:  Steven Erwood; Onofrio Laselva; Teija M I Bily; Reid A Brewer; Alexandra H Rutherford; Christine E Bear; Evgueni A Ivakine
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 6.698

8.  Case Report: Hypomorphic Function and Somatic Reversion in DOCK8 Deficiency in One Patient With Two Novel Variants and Sclerosing Cholangitis.

Authors:  Francesco Saettini; Grazia Fazio; Daniele Moratto; Marta Galbiati; Nicola Zucchini; Davide Ippolito; Marco Emilio Dinelli; Luisa Imberti; Mario Mauri; Maria Luisa Melzi; Sonia Bonanomi; Alessio Gerussi; Marinella Pinelli; Chiara Barisani; Cristina Bugarin; Marco Chiarini; Mauro Giacomelli; Rocco Piazza; Giovanni Cazzaniga; Pietro Invernizzi; Silvia Clara Giliani; Raffaele Badolato; Andrea Biondi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  Reversion Mosaicism in Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases.

Authors:  Hanae Miyazawa; Taizo Wada
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 7.561

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.