| Literature DB >> 33936120 |
Francesco Saettini1, Grazia Fazio2, Daniele Moratto3, Marta Galbiati2, Nicola Zucchini4, Davide Ippolito5, Marco Emilio Dinelli6, Luisa Imberti7, Mario Mauri8, Maria Luisa Melzi9, Sonia Bonanomi1, Alessio Gerussi10,11, Marinella Pinelli12, Chiara Barisani12, Cristina Bugarin2, Marco Chiarini3, Mauro Giacomelli12, Rocco Piazza8, Giovanni Cazzaniga2,8, Pietro Invernizzi10,11, Silvia Clara Giliani12, Raffaele Badolato13, Andrea Biondi1,2.
Abstract
DOCK8 deficiency is a combined immunodeficiency due to biallelic variants in dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) gene. The disease has a wide clinical spectrum encompassing recurrent infections (candidiasis, viral and bacterial infections), virally driven malignancies and immune dysregulatory features, including autoimmune (cytopenia and vasculitis) as well as allergic disorders (eczema, asthma, and food allergy). Hypomorphic function and somatic reversion of DOCK8 has been reported to result in incomplete phenotype without IgE overproduction. Here we describe a case of DOCK8 deficiency in a 8-year-old Caucasian girl. The patient's disease was initially classified as autoimmune thrombocytopenia, which then evolved toward a combined immunodeficiency phenotype with recurrent infections, persistent EBV infection and lymphoproliferation. Two novel variants (one deletion and one premature stop codon) were characterized, resulting in markedly reduced, but not absent, DOCK8 expression. Somatic reversion of the DOCK8 deletion was identified in T cells. Hypomorphic function and somatic reversion were associated with restricted T cell repertoire, decreased STAT5 phosphorylation and impaired immune synapse functioning in T cells. Although the patient presented with incomplete phenotype (absence of markedly increase IgE and eosinophil count), sclerosing cholangitis was incidentally detected, thus indicating that hypomorphic function and somatic reversion of DOCK8 may delay disease progression but do not necessarily prevent from severe complications.Entities:
Keywords: DOCK 8; EBV - Epstein-Barr Virus; lymphopenia; primary immumunodeficiencies; sclerosing cholangitis; somatic reversion; thrombocytopenia
Year: 2021 PMID: 33936120 PMCID: PMC8085392 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.673487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Identification of compound heterozygous DOCK8 variants in the index patient. (A) Pedigree of the family. Solid symbols indicate affected patient; half solid symbols, heterozygous persons; circles, female family members; square, male family members. (B) Electropherograms showing the novel c.T824A mutation in DOCK8 patient’s epithelial cells and T-cell blasts. (C) Reversion of the deletion in patient’s T cells blasts detected by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PT, patient.
Immunological characteristics of the patient.
| 3 years | 4 years | 5 years | 6 years | 7 years | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin, g/dl | 11.1 (11.5-13.5) | 12.1 (11.5-13.5) | 12.5 (11.5-13.5) | 11.9 (11.5-15.5) | 12.3 (11.5-15.5) |
| WBC, x 109/l | 3.93 (5.2-11.0) | 6.26 (5.2-11.0) | 7.35 (5.2-11.0) | 7.35 (4.4-9.5) | 2.62 (4.4-9.5) |
| PLT, x 109/l | 25 (>140) | 330 (>140) | 337 (>140) | 423 (>140) | 332 (>140) |
| Neutrophils, x 109/l | 1.05 (>1.5) | 4.34 (>1.5) | 4.94 (>1.5) | 5.0 (>1.5) | 1.1 (>1.5) |
| Lymphocytes, x 109/l | 2.28 (2.3-5.4) | 1.08 (2.3-5.4) | 1.52 (2.3-5.4) | 1.23 (1.9-3.7) | 0.61 (1.9-3.7) |
| Eosinophils, x 109/l | 0.14 (<0.5) | 0.27 (<0.5) | 0.17 (<0.5) | 0.22 (<0.5) | 0.33 (<0.5) |
| IgG, mg/dl | 1971* (462-1710) | 643 (528-1959) | 823 (633-1919) | 913 (633-1919) | |
| IgA, mg/dl | 130 (27-173) | 93 (37-257) | 75 (41-315) | 40 (41-315) | |
| IgM, mg/dl | 43 (62-257) | 18 (49-292) | 39 (56-261) | 13 (56-261) | |
| IgE, kU/l | 19 | 25 | 493 | 504 | |
| CD3+, x 109/l | 1.05 (1.4-3.7) | 0.62 (1.4-3.7) | 0.85 (1.4-3.7) | 0.73 (0.99-3.53) | 0.60 (0.99-3.53) |
| CD4+, x 109/l | 0.43 (0.7-2.2) | 0.39 (0.7-2.2) | 0.44 (0.7-2.2) | 0.36 (0.50-2.12) | 0.41 (0.50-2.12) |
| Naïve CD4+CD45RA+CCR7+, % | 42.2 (49.2-85.8) | 28.6 (37.8-80.3) | 40.4 (37.8-80.3) | 35.0 (37.8-80.3) | |
| Recent thymic emigrants CD4+CD45RA+CCR7+CD31+, x 109/l | 32.0% (36.2-71.8) | 21.8% (20.3-68.9) | 115 (190-1024) | 118 (190-1024) | |
| Central Memory CD4+CD45RA-CCR7+, % | 33.8 (9.6-31.9) | 38.1 (9.9-41.1) | 27.4 (9.9-41.1) | 12.0 (9.9-41.1) | |
| Effector Memory CD4+CD45RA-CCR7-, % | 21.8 (2.8-16.9) | 30.9 (4.0-25.5) | 30.6 (4.0-25.5) | 31.8 (4.0-25.5) | |
| Terminally Differentiated CD4+CD45RA+CCR7-, % | 2.3 (0.7-4.8) | 2.8 (0.4-7.7) | 1.5 (0.4-7.7) | 21.2 (0.4-7.7) | |
| Regulatory T cells CD4+CD25+CD127low/-, x 103/l | 21 (42-207) | ||||
| Regulatory T cells CD4+CD25+CD127low/-, % | 5.0 (7.0-17.3) | ||||
| CD8+, x 109/l | 0.44 (0.49-1.3) | 0.15 (0.49-1.3) | 0.31 (0.49-1.3) | 0.28 (0.25-1.34) | 0.13 (0.25-1.34) |
| Naïve CD8+CD45RA+CCR7+, % | 8.9 (22.8-79.9) | 4.1 (20.3-78.2) | 5.3 (20.3-78.2) | 12.7 (20.3-78.2) | |
| Central Memory CD8+CD45RA-CCR7+, % | 4.7% (0.9-11.3) | 3.2% (1.7-13.3) | 0.9% (1.7-13.3) | 2.2% (1.7-13.3) | |
| Effector Memory CD8+CD45RA-CCR7-, % | 37.1% (4.3-31.4) | 40.8% (8.6-34.5) | 41.9% (8.6-34.5) | 25.5% (8.6-34.5) | |
| Terminally Differentiated CD8+CD45RA+CCR7-, % | 49.7% (6.8-52.7) | 52.3% (7.0-53.8) | 51.8% (7.0-53.8) | 59.6% (7.0-53.8) | |
| CD19+, x 109/l | 0.97 (0.39-1.4) | 0.39 (0.39-1.4) | 0.53 (0.39-1.4) | 0.43 (0.22-1.13) | 0+ |
| Recent B emigrants CD19+CD38++CD10+, % | 19.5% (10.6-42.6) | 16.9% (7.1-35.3) | 28.8% (7.1-35.3) | ||
| Naïve CD19+IgD+IgM+CD27-, % | 66.0% (34.2-65.5) | 61.0% (37.1-70.2) | 55.5% (37.1-70.2) | ||
| CD19++CD21low, % | 8.1% (1.5-9.8) | 9.8% (1.9-9.0) | 10.7% (1.9-9.0) | ||
| Switched Memory CD19+IgD-IgM-CD27+, % | 0.3% (1.5-4.2) | 0.6% (2.4-19.8) | 0.7% (2.4-19.8) | ||
| IgM Memory CD19+IgD+IgM+CD27+, % | 1.9% (2.9-15.3) | 3.5% (3.1-18.3) | 1.6% (3.1-18.3) | ||
| Terminally differentiated CD19+CD38++CD27+CD20-, % | 2.2% (0.4-15.3) | 4.9% (0.3-11.8) | 1.7% (0.3-11.8) | ||
| CD3-CD16+CD56+, x 109/l | 0.09 (0.13-0.72) | 0.05 (0.13-0.72) | 0.10 (0.13-0.72) | 0.1 (0.08-1.03) | 0.02 (0.08-1.03) |
* After IVIg. +After rituximab therapy.
Age-matched normal values are given between round brackets.
Figure 2Sclerosing cholangitis in the index patient. (A) Upper abdomen magnetic resonance showing diffuse and marked enlargement of intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts. (B) Liver biopsy showing one dilated duct with “onion-skin” type of periductal fibrosis.
Figure 3Functional characterization of the DOCK8 variants. (A) Evaluation of DOCK8 levels in IL2-PHA expanded T-cell of the index patient, family members and two healthy controls (HC1 and HC2) by means of flow cytometry (upper panel; one representative experiment of 2 independent experiments) and western blot (lower panel; one representative experiment of 2 independent experiments). (B) Flow cytometric analysis of DOCK8 expression in peripheral T-cells and monocytes of the patient and a healthy control, showing hypomorphic DOCK8 expression in CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+. (representative experiment) (C) Reduction of STAT5 phosphorylation in patient’s peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells at baseline and following stimulation with IL2 or CD3/CD28 monoclonal antibodies. (one representative experiment performed in duplicates) (D) Representative images of Actin (Red), LFA-1 (green) and DAPI (Blue) staining on unstimulated or CD3/CD28 stimulated CD8+ cells from the index patient and a healthy donor (representative experiment). Scale bar: 20um. In the right panel, box plots show the quantification of actin signal in analyzed samples. (**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). HC, healthy control; PT, patient; Stim, stimulated; Unstim, unstimulated. NS, not significant.